Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)
), John Dirk Pasalbessy(2), Margie Gladies Sopacua(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: There are several types of theft crimes ranging from ordinary theft crimes (Article 362 of the Criminal Code), light theft crimes (Article 364 of the Criminal Code), crimes of aggravated or qualified theft (Article 363 of the Criminal Code), crimes of violent theft (Article 365 of the Criminal Code), crimes of theft in within the family (Article 367 of the Criminal Code) with a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison.
Purposes of the Research:Analyzing and reviewing the application of Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in resolving cases of theft and Analyzing Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code can be used as a basis for consideration in cases of theft with violence, as one of the requirements in completing studies at the Faculty of Law.
Results of the Research:In the application of article 363 in the case of theft, the elements of article 363 can be applied, namely: Whoever, Takes something, With the intention of being owned, is against the law and is carried out at night in a house or a closed yard with a house. When all the elements in article 363 are met, the perpetrator's actions are determined as theft with weights but in the decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN Msh this is not the case because the judge's decision is still too light even though the defendant's actions meet the weighting elements. Article 363 can be used as a basis for judges' considerations because the elements in Article 363 can be used by judges as a basis for consideration before the judge decides on a theft case, but in decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN, the judge does not see the elements that have been fulfilled. by the defendant's actions so that the judge handed down a decision that was not in accordance with the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961
Published
2023-12-30
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI1961,
author = {Aditya Malaihollo and John Pasalbessy and Margie Sopacua},
title = {Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {3},
number = {10},
year = {2023},
keywords = {Juridical Analysis; Judges Considerations; Theft Cases},
abstract = {Introduction: There are several types of theft crimes ranging from ordinary theft crimes (Article 362 of the Criminal Code), light theft crimes (Article 364 of the Criminal Code), crimes of aggravated or qualified theft (Article 363 of the Criminal Code), crimes of violent theft (Article 365 of the Criminal Code), crimes of theft in within the family (Article 367 of the Criminal Code) with a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison.Purposes of the Research:Analyzing and reviewing the application of Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in resolving cases of theft and Analyzing Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code can be used as a basis for consideration in cases of theft with violence, as one of the requirements in completing studies at the Faculty of Law.Results of the Research:In the application of article 363 in the case of theft, the elements of article 363 can be applied, namely: Whoever, Takes something, With the intention of being owned, is against the law and is carried out at night in a house or a closed yard with a house. When all the elements in article 363 are met, the perpetrator's actions are determined as theft with weights but in the decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN Msh this is not the case because the judge's decision is still too light even though the defendant's actions meet the weighting elements. Article 363 can be used as a basis for judges' considerations because the elements in Article 363 can be used by judges as a basis for consideration before the judge decides on a theft case, but in decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN, the judge does not see the elements that have been fulfilled. by the defendant's actions so that the judge handed down a decision that was not in accordance with the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {1020--1030} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1961}
}
Jurnal
Erwin Ubwarin, Jacob Hattu dan Wilshen Leatemia, Budaya Hukum Anti Korupsi Pada Warga Binaan Lapas Klas Ii A Ambon, Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, Vol 1, No 2, Juni 2020
Tino YS Hattu, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Hadibah Zachra Wadjo. "Penyidikan Terhadap Pelaku Pencurian Benda Sitaan Pada Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1.10 (2021): 1047-1061.
Buku
Azhary, Negara Hukum Indonesai (Analisis Yuridis Normatif Tentang UnsurUnsurnya) , UI Press, Jakarta, 1995
Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Persepektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionisme. Putra Abardin. Bandung: 1996
Marpaung, Leden., Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 1992
Marpaung, Leden., Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 1992
Chazawi, Adami, , Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Wirjono prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1986
Nugroho, Hibnu. Bunga Rampai Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Badan Penerbit Undip Semarang: 2010
Roni Hanitjo Soemitro, metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Yurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1980
Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1986
Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Orasi Pengukuhan Guru Besar di Universitas Indonesia, Depok: 8 Maret 2003
Chazawi, Adami. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 2002
Pidada, I. B. A., Sopacua, M. G., Titahelu, J. A. S., Fardiansyah, H., Rizkia, N. D., Mulyana, Y., ... & Surya, A,HUKUM PIDANA, (2022).
Online/World Wide Web
https://pengacarafaisalnasution.com/2019/09/06/apa-beda-pencurian-biasa-dengan-pencurian-dengan-pemberatan/
: 226 times
Download : 1003 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Aditya Putra Mentari Malaihollo, John Dirk Pasalbessy, Margie Gladies Sopacua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
