Penerapan Ajaran Pembelaan Terpaksa Dalam Perkara Putusan Nomor 372/ Pid.B / 2020 /PN Pdg
), Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa(2), Reimon Supusepa(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The forced defense is a reason for eliminating the nature of breaking the law (wederrechtelijkheid or onrechtmatigheid), so the reason for eliminating the nature of a criminal act (strafuitsluitings-grond) is also said to be the reason for justifying or justifying actions that are generally criminal acts (rechtvaardigings-grond) called fait justi ficatief.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the qualifications of forced defense in a criminal case, examine and explain the basic legal considerations in Decision Number 372/Pid.B/2020/PNPdg. The type of research used is normative juridical with qualitative analysis methods. The problem approach used is the conceptual approach, statutory approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials.
Results of the Research: The results of the study show that in principle the Criminal Code indirectly provides an overview of forced defense that what is meant by forced defense is a defense of rights against injustice where a person is forced to commit a crime, can be forgiven because there was a violation of law that preceded the act. In making his decision, the judge has considerations consisting of juridical considerations and sociological considerations. Juridical considerations are judges' considerations that are based on juridical facts revealed in court and in the law that have been stipulated as matters that must be included in the decision. Sociological considerations are a judge's considerations that use approaches to background, socio-economic conditions and values that exist in society in making a decision.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1962
Published
2023-12-30
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI1962,
author = {Femmy Somarwane and Deassy Hehanussa and Reimon Supusepa},
title = {Penerapan Ajaran Pembelaan Terpaksa Dalam Perkara Putusan Nomor 372/ Pid.B / 2020 /PN Pdg},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {3},
number = {10},
year = {2023},
keywords = {Application; Forced Defense Teachings; Judgment Cases},
abstract = {Introduction: The forced defense is a reason for eliminating the nature of breaking the law (wederrechtelijkheid or onrechtmatigheid), so the reason for eliminating the nature of a criminal act (strafuitsluitings-grond) is also said to be the reason for justifying or justifying actions that are generally criminal acts (rechtvaardigings-grond) called fait justi ficatief.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the qualifications of forced defense in a criminal case, examine and explain the basic legal considerations in Decision Number 372/Pid.B/2020/PNPdg. The type of research used is normative juridical with qualitative analysis methods. The problem approach used is the conceptual approach, statutory approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that in principle the Criminal Code indirectly provides an overview of forced defense that what is meant by forced defense is a defense of rights against injustice where a person is forced to commit a crime, can be forgiven because there was a violation of law that preceded the act. In making his decision, the judge has considerations consisting of juridical considerations and sociological considerations. Juridical considerations are judges' considerations that are based on juridical facts revealed in court and in the law that have been stipulated as matters that must be included in the decision. Sociological considerations are a judge's considerations that use approaches to background, socio-economic conditions and values that exist in society in making a decision.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {1031--1046} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1962},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1962}
}
Jurnal
Budayawan, T, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Menurut Hukum Pidana Tentang Daya Paksa (Overmacht), E-Jurnal: Spirit Pro Patria, 4(2), 2018.
Buku
Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana II, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2002.
Departemen P dan K, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 1989.
Gatot Supramono, Surat dakwaan dan putusan hakim yang batal demi hukum, Djambatan, Jakarta, 1991.
H. M. Hamdan, Alasan Penghapus Pidana Teori dan Studi Kasus, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2014.
K. Wantjik Saleh, Tindak Pidana, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2007.
Leden Marpaung, Unsur-unsur Perbuatan Yang Dapat Dihukum (Delik), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1991.
Lilik Mulyadi, Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2010.
Lilik Mulyadi, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Teori, Praktik, Teknik Penyusunan dan Permasalahannya, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2010.
Mahrus Ali, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana dalam Chairul Huda dari Tindak Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana tanpa Kesalahan, Cet. II. Jakarta, 2006.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2008.
Mujahid A. Latief, Kebijakan Reformasi Hukum: Suatu Rekomendasi (jilid II), Komi si Hukum Nasional RI, Jakarta, 2007.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1998.
R. Achmad Soema Di Pradja, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1982.
Roeslan Saleh, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum pidana, Aksara Baru, Jakarta, 1987.
Soerjono Soekanto, dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjaun Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persadia, Jakarta, 1994.
Tolib Effendi, 2014, Dasar Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana (Perkembangan dan Pembaharuannya Di Indonesia), Setara Press, Malang, 2014.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Eresco, Bandung, 1989.
Zainal Abidin Farid, Hukum Pidana I, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2007.
Lain-Lain
Pidada, I. B. A., Titahelu, J. A. S., Nainggolan, A. A., Sinaga, L. V., Hehanussa, D. J., Sopacua, M. G., ... & Fuady, M. I. N, Tindak Pidana Dalam KUHP, 2022.
Rusli Muhammad. Hukum Acara Pidana: Bagian Ke-II, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yokyakarta, 2005.
: 308 times
Download : 227 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Femmy Almendo Somarwane, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, Reimon Supusepa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
