Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak

Fioren Mataheru; Yanti Amelia Lewerissa; Carolina Tuhumury

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119

Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak

Fioren Mataheru⁽¹⁾, Yanti Amelia Lewerissa⁽²⁾, Carolina Tuhumury⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Community research (LITMAS) is one of the main tasks of Correctional Centers (Bapas). This task is carried out by the Social Guidance Functional officer. This Litmas aims to provide recommendations in the process of resolving child cases.

Purposes of the Research: Research Objectives: This study aims to find out whether social research reports have been used by judges as material for consideration in imposing crimes against children and what are the legal consequences of a judge's decision without considering social research reports.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research where library materials are the basis for (knowledge) research which is classified as a secondary source material. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, the conceptual analysis approach and the case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The collection technique used literature study as well as the processing and analysis techniques of legal materials by way of description using qualitative methods.

Results of the Research: The research results show that social research reports have not been considered optimally because there are still judges' decisions that ignore social research results. This is not in accordance with the hope of realizing the best justice for the interests of children provided by the SPPA Law. Therefore, the Government as the legislator must explain in detail how social research reports must be considered, so that judges do not have different interpretations when deciding cases.

Keywords

Community Research; Child Criminal Justice System; Judge Considerations.

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119

Published

2024-03-31

How To Cite

APA: Mataheru, F., Lewerissa, Y.A., & Tuhumury, C. (2024). Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 38 – 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119.

IEEE: F. Mataheru, Y.A. Lewerissa, and C. Tuhumury, "Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 38 – 48, Mar. 2024. Accessed on: May. 9, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119

Harvard: Mataheru, F., Lewerissa, Y.A., and Tuhumury, C., (2024). "Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 4(1), pp. 38 – 48. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119 (Accessed on: 9 May 2025)

Chicago: Mataheru, Fioren, Yanti Amelia Lewerissa, and Carolina Tuhumury. "Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (March 31, 2024): 38 – 48. Accessed May 9, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119

Vancouver: Mataheru F, Lewerissa YA, Tuhumury C. Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2024 Mar 31 [cited 2025 May 9];4(1):38 – 48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119

MLA 8th: Mataheru, Fioren, Yanti Amelia Lewerissa, and Carolina Tuhumury. "Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 4, no. 1, 31 Mar. 2024, pp. 38 – 48, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119. Accessed 9 May. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI2119,
		author = {Fioren Mataheru and Yanti Lewerissa and Carolina Tuhumury},
		title = {Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {4},
		number = {1},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Community Research; Child Criminal Justice System; Judge Considerations.},
		abstract = {Introduction: Community research (LITMAS) is one of the main tasks of Correctional Centers (Bapas). This task is carried out by the Social Guidance Functional officer. This Litmas aims to provide recommendations in the process of resolving child cases.Purposes of the Research: Research Objectives: This study aims to find out whether social research reports have been used by judges as material for consideration in imposing crimes against children and what are the legal consequences of a judge's decision without considering social research reports.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research where library materials are the basis for (knowledge) research which is classified as a secondary source material. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, the conceptual analysis approach and the case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The collection technique used literature study as well as the processing and analysis techniques of legal materials by way of description using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The research results show that social research reports have not been considered optimally because there are still judges' decisions that ignore social research results. This is not in accordance with the hope of realizing the best justice for the interests of children provided by the SPPA Law. Therefore, the Government as the legislator must explain in detail how social research reports must be considered, so that judges do not have different interpretations when deciding cases.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {38--48}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2119}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Junal

Jefta Ramschie, Reimon Supusepa, Yanti Amelia Lewerissa. Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 7 (2022).

Judy Marria Saimima dan Carolina Tuhumury. Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dan Penanganannya Di Desa Rumberu, Kecamatan Inamosol Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat, AIWADHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum, Vol. 1 (2), 2021.

Yanti Amelia Lewerissa, Kebijakan Kriminal Perburuan Burung Wallacea Di Kepulauan Aru. Jurnal Sasi, Vol. 27 (3), 2021.

Buku

Fachmi, Kepastian Hukum Mengenai Putusan Batal Demi Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia publishing, 2011.

Hadi Supeno, Kriminalisasi Anak, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010.

Jonaedi Efendi, Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum dan Rasa Keadilan Yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2018.

Lilik Mulyadi, Pengadilan Anak Di Indonesia, Teori, Praktek dan Permasalahannya, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2005.

Lilik Mulyadi, Kompilasi Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktik Peradilan.

Liza Agnesta Krisna, Hasil Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pengadilan Anak, Jurnal Hukum FH-Universitas Samudra, Vol. 10 (1). 2015.

Sudarsono, Cara Penyelesaian karya Ilmiah di Bidang Hukum, Edisi revisi, Yogyakarta: Mitra Kebijakan Tanah, 2006.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 189 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 394 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Fioren Mataheru; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Yanti Amelia Lewerissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Carolina Tuhumury; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Community Research; Child Criminal Justice System; Judge Considerations.

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: Community research (LITMAS) is one of the main tasks of Correctional Centers (Bapas). This task is carried out by the Social Guidance Functional officer. This Litmas aims to provide recommendations in the process of resolving child cases.Purposes of the Research: Research Objectives: This study aims to find out whether social research reports have been used by judges as material for consideration in imposing crimes against children and what are the legal consequences of a judge's decision without considering social research reports.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research where library materials are the basis for (knowledge) research which is classified as a secondary source material. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, the conceptual analysis approach and the case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The collection technique used literature study as well as the processing and analysis techniques of legal materials by way of description using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The research results show that social research reports have not been considered optimally because there are still judges' decisions that ignore social research results. This is not in accordance with the hope of realizing the best justice for the interests of children provided by the SPPA Law. Therefore, the Government as the legislator must explain in detail how social research reports must be considered, so that judges do not have different interpretations when deciding cases.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2024-03-31

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2119

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 4, No 1 (2024): Volume 4 Nomor 1, Maret 2024

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..