Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak
), Yanti Amelia Lewerissa(2), Carolina Tuhumury(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Community research (LITMAS) is one of the main tasks of Correctional Centers (Bapas). This task is carried out by the Social Guidance Functional officer. This Litmas aims to provide recommendations in the process of resolving child cases.
Purposes of the Research: Research Objectives: This study aims to find out whether social research reports have been used by judges as material for consideration in imposing crimes against children and what are the legal consequences of a judge's decision without considering social research reports.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research where library materials are the basis for (knowledge) research which is classified as a secondary source material. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, the conceptual analysis approach and the case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The collection technique used literature study as well as the processing and analysis techniques of legal materials by way of description using qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The research results show that social research reports have not been considered optimally because there are still judges' decisions that ignore social research results. This is not in accordance with the hope of realizing the best justice for the interests of children provided by the SPPA Law. Therefore, the Government as the legislator must explain in detail how social research reports must be considered, so that judges do not have different interpretations when deciding cases.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119
Published
2024-03-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI2119,
author = {Fioren Mataheru and Yanti Lewerissa and Carolina Tuhumury},
title = {Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Community Research; Child Criminal Justice System; Judge Considerations.},
abstract = {Introduction: Community research (LITMAS) is one of the main tasks of Correctional Centers (Bapas). This task is carried out by the Social Guidance Functional officer. This Litmas aims to provide recommendations in the process of resolving child cases.Purposes of the Research: Research Objectives: This study aims to find out whether social research reports have been used by judges as material for consideration in imposing crimes against children and what are the legal consequences of a judge's decision without considering social research reports.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research where library materials are the basis for (knowledge) research which is classified as a secondary source material. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, the conceptual analysis approach and the case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The collection technique used literature study as well as the processing and analysis techniques of legal materials by way of description using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The research results show that social research reports have not been considered optimally because there are still judges' decisions that ignore social research results. This is not in accordance with the hope of realizing the best justice for the interests of children provided by the SPPA Law. Therefore, the Government as the legislator must explain in detail how social research reports must be considered, so that judges do not have different interpretations when deciding cases.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {38--48} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2119}
}
Junal
Jefta Ramschie, Reimon Supusepa, Yanti Amelia Lewerissa. Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 7 (2022).
Judy Marria Saimima dan Carolina Tuhumury. Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dan Penanganannya Di Desa Rumberu, Kecamatan Inamosol Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat, AIWADHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum, Vol. 1 (2), 2021.
Yanti Amelia Lewerissa, Kebijakan Kriminal Perburuan Burung Wallacea Di Kepulauan Aru. Jurnal Sasi, Vol. 27 (3), 2021.
Buku
Fachmi, Kepastian Hukum Mengenai Putusan Batal Demi Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia publishing, 2011.
Hadi Supeno, Kriminalisasi Anak, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010.
Jonaedi Efendi, Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum dan Rasa Keadilan Yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2018.
Lilik Mulyadi, Pengadilan Anak Di Indonesia, Teori, Praktek dan Permasalahannya, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2005.
Lilik Mulyadi, Kompilasi Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktik Peradilan.
Liza Agnesta Krisna, Hasil Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pengadilan Anak, Jurnal Hukum FH-Universitas Samudra, Vol. 10 (1). 2015.
Sudarsono, Cara Penyelesaian karya Ilmiah di Bidang Hukum, Edisi revisi, Yogyakarta: Mitra Kebijakan Tanah, 2006.
: 127 times
Download : 229 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Fioren Mataheru, Yanti Amelia Lewerissa, Carolina Tuhumury
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
