Acts Of Omission Dan Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Perlindungan HAM Internasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i5.2438Keywords:
Act Of Ommission, State Responsibility, Human Rights ProtectionAbstract
Introduction: If we look at the cases of violations of human rights in the United States where youths aged 18 years used firearms to commit acts of murder, it is therefore clear that these violations of human rights must still be accounted for in accordance with the provisions that apply to the International Law Commission and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to examine and find out the arrangements regarding Acts Of Omission in international human rights instruments and state accountability in Acts Of Omission as a form of human rights protection.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this paper is normative legal research. As for answering the problems in this study, the authors use three approaches to the problem, namely the statutory approach (statute approach), dan conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The procedure for collecting legal materials carried out by the author is by searching for and collecting laws and regulations related to the legal issues at hand. Legislation in this case includes both legislation and regulation. Analysis of legal material uses qualitative methods, namely studies related to legal norms contained in international law legislation and legal norms that exist in society.
Results of the Research: The results of this study show that the provisions concerning acts of omission in international human rights instruments are contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The protection provided by the state is part of respect for human dignity. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed a common standard of achieving well-being for all people and all nations. This declaration includes all rights under civil-political rights (ICCPR) as well as economic, social and cultural rights (ICESCR).
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Adam Muhshi, Teologi Konstitusi: Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Atas Kebebasan Beragama, LKIS Pelangi Aksara, Yogyakarta. 2015.
Al-Rahab, A., Pelanggaran HAM yang berat di Papua: Konteks dan solusinya, Jurnal HAM, 12, 2016
Andrew Clapham, Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press. 2012.
Anggriani, R., Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Irregular Migrant Workers Indonesia Di Kawasan Asia Tenggara (Dalam Perspektif Hukum HAM Internasional), Jurnal Yuridika, 32 (2), 2017.
D’Amato, A., The Concept of Custom in International Law, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. 1971.
Eko Riyadi, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, Rajawali Press, Depok. 2018.
Encik Muhammad Fauzan, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, SetaraPress, Malang, 2017.
Firdiansyah, Peran Dan Harapan Korban Untuk Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Berat HAM Masa Lalu, Jurnal HAM, XIII, 2016
Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, Ketahanan Pangan Masyarakat Adat Sebagai Wujud Pemenuhan HAM dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19, Jurnal Sasi, Universitas Pattimura, Vol.27 No. 2, 2021.
Kasalang, R. J., Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Memenuhi Hak Masyarakat Atas Air, Dalam To Promote: Membaca Perkembangan Wacana Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia, Pusham UII, Yogyakarta. 2012.
Marzuki, S., Pengadilan HAM di Indonesia: Melanggengkan impunity, Erlangga, Jakarta. 2012.
Pranoto Iskandar, Hukum HAM Internasional, Perpustakaan Nasional Indonesia Cianjur. 2010.
Rhona K. M. Smith, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, PUSHAM UII, Yogyakarta, 2008
Syafi’i. M., Intrumentasi hukum HAM, Pembentukan Lembaga Perlindungan HAM di Indonesia dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), 2012.
Yudawiranata, A., Konstruksi Tindak Pidana Dalam Pelanggaran Berat HAM, Makalah dalam Pelatihan HAM Bagi Dosen, 2006.
Zainal Abidin, Pelanggaran HAM Dan Hak Korbam, Dalam Panduan Bantuan Hukum, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta. 2014.
Zeffry Alkatiri, Multikultur dan Multiperspektif dalam HAM Internasional, Jurnal Wacana, Vol. 8 No. 2, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mirna Waty Layn, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw, Welly Angela Riry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
