Penerapan Ajaran Kausalitas Pada Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang mengakibatkan Kematian

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

Abstract
Introduction: The teaching of causality in criminal law or better known as a causal relationship is very interesting. There are various theories of causality known in criminal law. These theories were born to answer one important question in criminal law, namely what is the cause of an effect. Often in the event of a traffic accident the focus in solving is only on the facts of the incident but the presence of causality becomes a filter to see which is the cause of the effect.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the application of causality to traffic accidents that result in death.
Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research. In this study, the approach used is the legal approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by means of library research by collecting materials through invitations, reference books, mass media, such as newspapers. The overall data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.
Results of the Research : The results of this study indicate that the application of the teaching of causality to traffic accidents resulting in death has its own problems where law enforcers, both the police, prosecutors and judges, always use the theory/doctrine of causality because the causality teaching has not been clearly defined, so the application that is present only one or two doctrines from the teachings of causality, be it the theory of conditio sine quo non, generalizing, individualizing, to relevance. Therefore it is very important to provide technical guidelines for judges and prosecutors in interpreting, exploring, analyzing, and applying the teachings of causality so that the process of finding causes that cause prohibited effects produces a truth.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v4i6.2456
Published
2024-08-30
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI2456, author = {Lukas Eugara and Deassy Hehanussa and Julianus Latupeirissa}, title = {Penerapan Ajaran Kausalitas Pada Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang mengakibatkan Kematian}, journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum}, volume = {4}, number = {6}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Causality Teaching; Traffic Accident; Death}, abstract = {Introduction: The teaching of causality in criminal law or better known as a causal relationship is very interesting. There are various theories of causality known in criminal law. These theories were born to answer one important question in criminal law, namely what is the cause of an effect. Often in the event of a traffic accident the focus in solving is only on the facts of the incident but the presence of causality becomes a filter to see which is the cause of the effect.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the application of causality to traffic accidents that result in death.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research. In this study, the approach used is the legal approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by means of library research by collecting materials through invitations, reference books, mass media, such as newspapers. The overall data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research : The results of this study indicate that the application of the teaching of causality to traffic accidents resulting in death has its own problems where law enforcers, both the police, prosecutors and judges, always use the theory/doctrine of causality because the causality teaching has not been clearly defined, so the application that is present only one or two doctrines from the teachings of causality, be it the theory of conditio sine quo non, generalizing, individualizing, to relevance. Therefore it is very important to provide technical guidelines for judges and prosecutors in interpreting, exploring, analyzing, and applying the teachings of causality so that the process of finding causes that cause prohibited effects produces a truth.}, issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {497--514} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i6.2456}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2456} }
Ahmad Sofian, Ajaran Kausalitas Hukum Pidana, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2018.
Al-Mahdi, dkk. “Perdamaian Dalam Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, Volume 1, No. 4, November 2013.
Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rinek Cipata, Jakarta, 2010.
Andi Sofyan dan Nur Aziza, Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana, Makassar, Pustaka Pena Press, 2016.
Arief, Barda Nawawi, Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan Dan Perbandingan Hukum Pidana). Pustaka Magister, Semarang, 2011.
Asep Supriadi, Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung, 2014.
Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana Komentaratas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam KitabUndang-Undang Pidana Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 2003.
Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2003.
Juanrico A. S. Titahelu, 2020, Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Terhadap Anak Dibidang Lalu Lintas, Jurnal Masohi, Volume 01, No 01.
M Syarifudin Abadillah, 2020, ”Penerapan Asas Kausalitas Dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Menyebabkan Korban Meninggal Dunia”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya Vol 8,Nomor 5.
Muhhamad Mu’iz Raharjo, Pokok-Pokok dan Sistem Pemerintahan Desa, Jakarta, 2021.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2009.
Roeslan Saleh, Masih Saja Tentang Kesalahan, Karya Dunia Fikri, Bandung, 1994.
Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok, 2010.
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Penerapan Ajaran Kausalitas Pada Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang mengakibatkan Kematian |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Lukas Putra Eugara; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Causality Teaching; Traffic Accident; Death |
4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The teaching of causality in criminal law or better known as a causal relationship is very interesting. There are various theories of causality known in criminal law. These theories were born to answer one important question in criminal law, namely what is the cause of an effect. Often in the event of a traffic accident the focus in solving is only on the facts of the incident but the presence of causality becomes a filter to see which is the cause of the effect.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the application of causality to traffic accidents that result in death.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research. In this study, the approach used is the legal approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by means of library research by collecting materials through invitations, reference books, mass media, such as newspapers. The overall data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research : The results of this study indicate that the application of the teaching of causality to traffic accidents resulting in death has its own problems where law enforcers, both the police, prosecutors and judges, always use the theory/doctrine of causality because the causality teaching has not been clearly defined, so the application that is present only one or two doctrines from the teachings of causality, be it the theory of conditio sine quo non, generalizing, individualizing, to relevance. Therefore it is very important to provide technical guidelines for judges and prosecutors in interpreting, exploring, analyzing, and applying the teachings of causality so that the process of finding causes that cause prohibited effects produces a truth. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | Universitas Pattimura |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2024-08-30 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2456 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v4i6.2456 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 4, No 6 (2024): Volume 4 Nomor 6, Agustus 2024 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lukas Putra Eugara, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0