Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal
), Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu(2), Elias Zadrach Leasa(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Forced power in criminal law is the most important part and cannot be separated from criminal acts to measure and determine a grant of accountability to someone who commits a crime and is regulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code which states: Whoever commits an act due to the influence of coercive force, is not can be punished. However, in the case that occurred at the Kepanjen District Court in Malang district, it gave the opposite decision regarding the abuse case committed by the victim MZA against the robber by giving MZA a guilty verdict for legally committing maltreatment which caused the death of a person as stipulated in Article 351 of the Criminal Code.
Purposes of the Research: To find out and analyze the process of resolving cases of abuse committed by victims against robbers, to find out and analyze the judge's legal considerations regarding the criminal act of abuse committed by the victim against the robber.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is Normative Juridical, Type of research is Descriptive Analytical, Sources of legal materials: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary, Techniques for collecting legal materials using Literature Study, Analysis of legal materials using Qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The results of the study show that: 1. Sanctions were given to MZA as the perpetrator of the persecution that caused the death of a person (in this case the victim of mugging) committed by the victim MISNAN and MAD (in this case the perpetrator of the robbery) in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.Kpn should not have been dropped on MZA because the act can be categorized as an act committed under coercive circumstances as stipulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code. 2. Overall in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Kpn the Panel of Judges has considered the existence of acts of self-defense in the case. However, according to the author, the Panel of Judges did not consider the legal facts at the location a case incident that forced and threatened MZA so that he could not escape which led to the act of taking out a knife and stabbing him as part of MZA's self-defense efforts
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464
Published
2024-09-30
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI2464,
author = {Eko Syauta and Juanrico Titahelu and Elias Leasa},
title = {Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {4},
number = {7},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Forced Force; Mistreatment of Victims; Begal},
abstract = {Introduction: Forced power in criminal law is the most important part and cannot be separated from criminal acts to measure and determine a grant of accountability to someone who commits a crime and is regulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code which states: Whoever commits an act due to the influence of coercive force, is not can be punished. However, in the case that occurred at the Kepanjen District Court in Malang district, it gave the opposite decision regarding the abuse case committed by the victim MZA against the robber by giving MZA a guilty verdict for legally committing maltreatment which caused the death of a person as stipulated in Article 351 of the Criminal Code.Purposes of the Research: To find out and analyze the process of resolving cases of abuse committed by victims against robbers, to find out and analyze the judge's legal considerations regarding the criminal act of abuse committed by the victim against the robber.Methods of the Research: The research method used is Normative Juridical, Type of research is Descriptive Analytical, Sources of legal materials: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary, Techniques for collecting legal materials using Literature Study, Analysis of legal materials using Qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that: 1. Sanctions were given to MZA as the perpetrator of the persecution that caused the death of a person (in this case the victim of mugging) committed by the victim MISNAN and MAD (in this case the perpetrator of the robbery) in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.Kpn should not have been dropped on MZA because the act can be categorized as an act committed under coercive circumstances as stipulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code. 2. Overall in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Kpn the Panel of Judges has considered the existence of acts of self-defense in the case. However, according to the author, the Panel of Judges did not consider the legal facts at the location a case incident that forced and threatened MZA so that he could not escape which led to the act of taking out a knife and stabbing him as part of MZA's self-defense efforts},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {554--567} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2464}
}
Adam Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014
Andi Hamzah, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2006.
Andi Matalatta, Victimilogy Sebuah Bunga Rampai, Pusat Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 1987.
Barda Nawawi, Upaya No Penal dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 1991.
Basir Rohrohmana. Tindak Pidana, Unsur Tindak Pidana, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Jayapura: Fakutas Hukum Universitas Cenderawasih, 2001.
C.S.T Kansil, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1993.
Eddy O. S. Hiarij, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2014.
Hasbullah F. Sjawie, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2015.
Hibnu Nugroho, Bunga Rampai Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip, 2010.
Ismu Gunadi, Jonaedi Efendi dan Fifit Fitri Lutfianingsih, Cepat & Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Penebar Swadaya, 2011.
Jesylia Hillary Lawalata, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarez Titahelu dan Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa, 2022, Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Pada Tahapan Penyidikan, TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2 Nomor 1Maret 2022.
Leden Marpaung, Asas, Teori, Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2012.
M. Yahya Harahap b, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali). Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Semarang: BP UNDIP, 2004.
Muladi & Dwidja Priyatno, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2010
P A F Lamintang, Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Bandung: Armico, 1994.
Roeslan Saleh,“Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana” dan pengertian dalam hukum pidana, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983.
Romli Atmasasmita, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2000.
Sampur Dongan Simamora & Mega Fitri Hertini, Hukum Pidana Dalam Bagan, FH Untan Press, Pontianak, 2015.
Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok, 2010.
: 80 times
Download : 84 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Eko Prasetio Syauta, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Elias Zadrach Leasa
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
