Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal

Eko Prasetio Syauta; Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu; Elias Zadrach Leasa

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464

Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal

Eko Prasetio Syauta⁽¹⁾, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu⁽²⁾, Elias Zadrach Leasa⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Forced power in criminal law is the most important part and cannot be separated from criminal acts to measure and determine a grant of accountability to someone who commits a crime and is regulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code which states: Whoever commits an act due to the influence of coercive force, is not can be punished. However, in the case that occurred at the Kepanjen District Court in Malang district, it gave the opposite decision regarding the abuse case committed by the victim MZA against the robber by giving MZA a guilty verdict for legally committing maltreatment which caused the death of a person as stipulated in Article 351 of the Criminal Code.

Purposes of the Research: To find out and analyze the process of resolving cases of abuse committed by victims against robbers, to find out and analyze the judge's legal considerations regarding the criminal act of abuse committed by the victim against the robber.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is Normative Juridical, Type of research is Descriptive Analytical, Sources of legal materials: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary, Techniques for collecting legal materials using Literature Study, Analysis of legal materials using Qualitative methods.

Results of the Research: The results of the study show that: 1. Sanctions were given to MZA as the perpetrator of the persecution that caused the death of a person (in this case the victim of mugging) committed by the victim MISNAN and MAD (in this case the perpetrator of the robbery) in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.Kpn should not have been dropped on MZA because the act can be categorized as an act committed under coercive circumstances as stipulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code. 2. Overall in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Kpn the Panel of Judges has considered the existence of acts of self-defense in the case. However, according to the author, the Panel of Judges did not consider the legal facts at the location a case incident that forced and threatened MZA so that he could not escape which led to the act of taking out a knife and stabbing him as part of MZA's self-defense efforts

Keywords

Forced Force; Mistreatment of Victims; Begal

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464

Published

2024-09-30

How To Cite

APA: Syauta, E.P., Titahelu, J.A., & Leasa, E.Z. (2024). Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(7), 554 – 567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464.

IEEE: E.P. Syauta, J.A. Titahelu, and E.Z. Leasa, "Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 554 – 567, Sep. 2024. Accessed on: Apr. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464

Harvard: Syauta, E.P., Titahelu, J.A., and Leasa, E.Z., (2024). "Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 4(7), pp. 554 – 567. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464 (Accessed on: 30 April 2025)

Chicago: Syauta, Eko Prasetio, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 7 (September 30, 2024): 554 – 567. Accessed April 30, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464

Vancouver: Syauta EP, Titahelu JA, Leasa EZ. Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2024 Sep 30 [cited 2025 Apr 30];4(7):554 – 567. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464

MLA 8th: Syauta, Eko Prasetio, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 4, no. 7, 30 Sep. 2024, pp. 554 – 567, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464. Accessed 30 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI2464,
		author = {Eko Syauta and Juanrico Titahelu and Elias Leasa},
		title = {Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {4},
		number = {7},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Forced Force; Mistreatment of Victims; Begal},
		abstract = {Introduction:  Forced power in criminal law is the most important part and cannot be separated from criminal acts to measure and determine a grant of accountability to someone who commits a crime and is regulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code which states: Whoever commits an act due to the influence of coercive force, is not can be punished. However, in the case that occurred at the Kepanjen District Court in Malang district, it gave the opposite decision regarding the abuse case committed by the victim MZA against the robber by giving MZA a guilty verdict for legally committing maltreatment which caused the death of a person as stipulated in Article 351 of the Criminal Code.Purposes of the Research: To find out and analyze the process of resolving cases of abuse committed by victims against robbers, to find out and analyze the judge's legal considerations regarding the criminal act of abuse committed by the victim against the robber.Methods of the Research:  The research method used is Normative Juridical, Type of research is Descriptive Analytical, Sources of legal materials: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary, Techniques for collecting legal materials using Literature Study, Analysis of legal materials using Qualitative methods.Results of the Research:  The results of the study show that: 1. Sanctions were given to MZA as the perpetrator of the persecution that caused the death of a person (in this case the victim of mugging) committed by the victim MISNAN and MAD (in this case the perpetrator of the robbery) in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.Kpn should not have been dropped on MZA because the act can be categorized as an act committed under coercive circumstances as stipulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code. 2. Overall in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Kpn the Panel of Judges has considered the existence of acts of self-defense in the case. However, according to the author, the Panel of Judges did not consider the legal facts at the location a case incident that forced and threatened MZA so that he could not escape which led to the act of taking out a knife and stabbing him as part of MZA's self-defense efforts},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {554--567}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2464}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Adam Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.

Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014

Andi Hamzah, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2006.

Andi Matalatta, Victimilogy Sebuah Bunga Rampai, Pusat Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 1987.

Barda Nawawi, Upaya No Penal dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 1991.

Basir Rohrohmana. Tindak Pidana, Unsur Tindak Pidana, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Jayapura: Fakutas Hukum Universitas Cenderawasih, 2001.

C.S.T Kansil, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1993.

Eddy O. S. Hiarij, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2014.

Hasbullah F. Sjawie, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2015.

Hibnu Nugroho, Bunga Rampai Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip, 2010.

Ismu Gunadi, Jonaedi Efendi dan Fifit Fitri Lutfianingsih, Cepat & Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Penebar Swadaya, 2011.

Jesylia Hillary Lawalata, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarez Titahelu dan Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa, 2022, Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Pada Tahapan Penyidikan, TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2 Nomor 1Maret 2022.

Leden Marpaung, Asas, Teori, Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2012.

M. Yahya Harahap b, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali). Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Semarang: BP UNDIP, 2004.

Muladi & Dwidja Priyatno, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2010

P A F Lamintang, Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Bandung: Armico, 1994.

Roeslan Saleh,“Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana” dan pengertian dalam hukum pidana, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983.

Romli Atmasasmita, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2000.

Sampur Dongan Simamora & Mega Fitri Hertini, Hukum Pidana Dalam Bagan, FH Untan Press, Pontianak, 2015.

Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok, 2010.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 105 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 106 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Penerapan Daya Paksa dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan yang dilakukan Korban Terhadap Pelaku Begal

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Eko Prasetio Syauta; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Elias Zadrach Leasa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Forced Force; Mistreatment of Victims; Begal

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: Forced power in criminal law is the most important part and cannot be separated from criminal acts to measure and determine a grant of accountability to someone who commits a crime and is regulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code which states: Whoever commits an act due to the influence of coercive force, is not can be punished. However, in the case that occurred at the Kepanjen District Court in Malang district, it gave the opposite decision regarding the abuse case committed by the victim MZA against the robber by giving MZA a guilty verdict for legally committing maltreatment which caused the death of a person as stipulated in Article 351 of the Criminal Code.Purposes of the Research: To find out and analyze the process of resolving cases of abuse committed by victims against robbers, to find out and analyze the judge's legal considerations regarding the criminal act of abuse committed by the victim against the robber.Methods of the Research: The research method used is Normative Juridical, Type of research is Descriptive Analytical, Sources of legal materials: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary, Techniques for collecting legal materials using Literature Study, Analysis of legal materials using Qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that: 1. Sanctions were given to MZA as the perpetrator of the persecution that caused the death of a person (in this case the victim of mugging) committed by the victim MISNAN and MAD (in this case the perpetrator of the robbery) in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.Kpn should not have been dropped on MZA because the act can be categorized as an act committed under coercive circumstances as stipulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code. 2. Overall in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Kpn the Panel of Judges has considered the existence of acts of self-defense in the case. However, according to the author, the Panel of Judges did not consider the legal facts at the location a case incident that forced and threatened MZA so that he could not escape which led to the act of taking out a knife and stabbing him as part of MZA's self-defense efforts

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)	Universitas Pattimura

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2024-09-30

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2464

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v4i7.2464

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 4, No 7 (2024): Volume 4 Nomor 7, September 2024

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 Eko Prasetio Syauta, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Elias Zadrach Leasa

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0