Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)

Finsensius Samara; Dwityas Witarti Rabawati; Rosalia Martha Jawa Kelen; Sonya Prisilia Umar; Francisco Tolentino Bukifan Bukifan; Jeremias Oelue

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779

Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)

Finsensius Samara⁽¹⁾, Dwityas Witarti Rabawati⁽²⁾, Rosalia Martha Jawa Kelen⁽³⁾, Sonya Prisilia Umar⁽⁴⁾, Francisco Tolentino Bukifan Bukifan⁽⁵⁾, Jeremias Oelue⁽⁶⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang, Indonesia
(4) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang, Indonesia
(5) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang, Indonesia
(6) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: In 2024, Indonesia remains among the ten Asian countries with the lowest income. PPATK data reveals that 2.2 million low-income Indonesians are gamblers, threatening the vision of Indonesia Emas 2045. Gambling, categorized as a crime under Articles 303 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), causes significant losses.

Purposes of the Research: The objective of this research is to analyze the judge's considerations in giving light sentences in gambling cases, specifically those involving the offering of gambling games, using Decision Number 65/PID.B/2013/PN.LBJ as a case study.

Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative legal research method with an analytical approach. The analysis is conducted on legal norms, court decisions, and related literature to understand the judge's considerations in the case.

Results of the Research: The findings show that although the defendant fulfilled the elements of Article 303 of the KUHP, the judge considered mitigating circumstances, such as the defendant's age, pregnancy, respectful demeanor in court, admission of guilt, and remorse. The judge balanced legal certainty with justice and utility, demonstrating an educative and preventive approach in sentencing

Keywords

Gambling; Judicial Considerations; Legal Certainty; Justice.

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779

Published

2024-12-31

How To Cite

APA: Samara, F., Rabawati, D.W., Kelen, R.M., Umar, S.P., Bukifan, F.T., & Oelue, J. (2024). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ). TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(10), 814 – 824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779.

IEEE: F. Samara, D.W. Rabawati, R.M. Kelen, S.P. Umar, F.T. Bukifan, and J. Oelue, "Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 814 – 824, Dec. 2024. Accessed on: Apr. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779

Harvard: Samara, F., Rabawati, D.W., Kelen, R.M., Umar, S.P., Bukifan, F.T., and Oelue, J., (2024). "Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 4(10), pp. 814 – 824. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779 (Accessed on: 27 April 2025)

Chicago: Samara, Finsensius, Dwityas Witarti Rabawati, Rosalia Martha Jawa Kelen, Sonya Prisilia Umar, Francisco Tolentino Bukifan Bukifan, and Jeremias Oelue. "Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 10 (December 31, 2024): 814 – 824. Accessed April 27, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779

Vancouver: Samara F, Rabawati DW, Kelen RM, Umar SP, Bukifan FT, Oelue J. Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ). TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2024 Dec 31 [cited 2025 Apr 27];4(10):814 – 824. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779

MLA 8th: Samara, Finsensius, Dwityas Witarti Rabawati, Rosalia Martha Jawa Kelen, Sonya Prisilia Umar, Francisco Tolentino Bukifan Bukifan, and Jeremias Oelue. "Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 4, no. 10, 31 Dec. 2024, pp. 814 – 824, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779. Accessed 27 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI2779,
		author = {Finsensius Samara and Dwityas Rabawati and Rosalia Kelen and Sonya Umar and Francisco Bukifan and Jeremias Oelue},
		title = {Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {4},
		number = {10},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Gambling; Judicial Considerations; Legal Certainty; Justice.},
		abstract = {Introduction: In 2024, Indonesia remains among the ten Asian countries with the lowest income. PPATK data reveals that 2.2 million low-income Indonesians are gamblers, threatening the vision of Indonesia Emas 2045. Gambling, categorized as a crime under Articles 303 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), causes significant losses.Purposes of the Research: The objective of this research is to analyze the judge's considerations in giving light sentences in gambling cases, specifically those involving the offering of gambling games, using Decision Number 65/PID.B/2013/PN.LBJ as a case study.Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative legal research method with an analytical approach. The analysis is conducted on legal norms, court decisions, and related literature to understand the judge's considerations in the case.Results of the Research: The findings show that although the defendant fulfilled the elements of Article 303 of the KUHP, the judge considered mitigating circumstances, such as the defendant's age, pregnancy, respectful demeanor in court, admission of guilt, and remorse. The judge balanced legal certainty with justice and utility, demonstrating an educative and preventive approach in sentencing},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {814--824}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2779}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Dermawan, Ari, Rahmat, dan Rahmat Suhargon. "Tindak Pidana Terhadap Masyarakat Menawarkan Perjudian Online." Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 6.1 (2022): 4643-4651.

Efendi, Jonaedi, dan Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.

Fatahillah, Abdul, dan Ummu Habibah Hakim. "Menemukan Tren Baru di Kalangan Pemuda: Analisis Pola Praktik Perjudian Toto Gelap di Kabupaten Klaten." Asketik: Jurnal Agama dan Perubahan Sosial 7.1 (2023): 121-140.

Hakim, Lukman. Penerapan dan Implementasi Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Deepubli SH, 2020.

Mustofa, Wildan Suyuthi. Kode Etik Hakim. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Perdata, Tuada. Batasan Umur (Kecakapan dan kewenangan bertindak berdasarkan batasan umur). Disarikan dari buku Penjelasan Hukum tentang Batasan Umur oleh Ade Maman Suherman & J Satrio.

Purnama, Tri, dan Sulaiman. "Penetapan Status Tersangka oleh Hakim Melalui Persidangan dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana." CENDEKIA: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial & Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2023): 133-147.

Sanjaya, Roy. "Konstruksi Teori Efek Jera Sebagai Parameter Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana." Pusat Analisa Kebijakan Hukum Dan Ekonomi 20 (2020).

Saputra, Prima Andika, I. Dewa Putu Eskasasnanda, and Sukamto Sukamto. "Fenomena Judi Kartu Remi Di Dusun Medang Desa Sampung Kecamatan Sampung Kabupaten Ponorogo." Dimensia: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi 9.2 (2020): 115-124.

Setiawan, Yudhi. "Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Kartu Kredit dalam Klausula Baku." Commerce Law 2.1 (2022).

Susilowati, MG Westri Kekalih. "Judi dan Kemiskinan." Kompas.com, 24 Oktober 2023. Retrieved from https://money.kompas.com/read/2023/10/24/055936426/judi-dan-kemiskinan?page=all, diakses 20 November 2024.

Tempo.co. "5 Negara Termiskin di Asia Tenggara Berdasarkan PDB per Kapita 2024, Ada Indonesia?" 13 September 2024. Retrieved from https://dunia.tempo.co/read/1915785/5-negara-termiskin-di-asia-tenggara-berdasarkan-pdb-per-kapita-2024-ada-indonesia, diakses 21 Desember 2024.

Tim detikcom. "Korupsi Sampan Rp 159 Juta, Taufik Dihukum 1 Tahun Penjara." detikNews, 19 Juli 2019. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4630870/korupsi-sampan-rp-159-juta-taufik-dihukum-1-tahun-penjara, diakses 21 Desember 2024.

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 116 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Ringan pada Kasus Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 65 /PID.B/2013 /PN.LBJ)

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Finsensius Samara; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Dwityas Witarti Rabawati; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Rosalia Martha Jawa Kelen; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Sonya Prisilia Umar; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Francisco Tolentino Bukifan Bukifan; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Jeremias Oelue; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Gambling; Judicial Considerations; Legal Certainty; Justice.

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: In 2024, Indonesia remains among the ten Asian countries with the lowest income. PPATK data reveals that 2.2 million low-income Indonesians are gamblers, threatening the vision of Indonesia Emas 2045. Gambling, categorized as a crime under Articles 303 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), causes significant losses.Purposes of the Research: The objective of this research is to analyze the judge's considerations in giving light sentences in gambling cases, specifically those involving the offering of gambling games, using Decision Number 65/PID.B/2013/PN.LBJ as a case study.Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative legal research method with an analytical approach. The analysis is conducted on legal norms, court decisions, and related literature to understand the judge's considerations in the case.Results of the Research: The findings show that although the defendant fulfilled the elements of Article 303 of the KUHP, the judge considered mitigating circumstances, such as the defendant's age, pregnancy, respectful demeanor in court, admission of guilt, and remorse. The judge balanced legal certainty with justice and utility, demonstrating an educative and preventive approach in sentencing

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2024-12-31

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2779

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v4i10.2779

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 4, No 10 (2024): Volume 4 Nomor 10, Desember 2024

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..