The Concept of Countering Material Law (Materiele Wederrechtelijk) And Its Relevance To The Natural Law Stream
)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The development of the concept of unlawfulness (wederrechtelijk) is interesting to accentuate, because unlawful is not only limited to unlawful in the formal sense, but also includes unlawful material law (materiele wederrechtelijk) which has abstract content, because unlawful material law can be interpreted even though the act does not violate the rules of criminal law.
Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to analyze how the relevance of the concept against material law (materiele wederrechtelijk) with the natural law stream that is in line and has an identity between the two.
Methods of the Research: This paper uses a type of normative legal research. The approaches used in this paper are the conceptual approach, the theoretical approach, and the philosophical approach.
Findings of the Research: The concept of material law is interpreted as not only violating the applicable legal rules. However, this is because an act is considered "against the law" from its origin. This means that the common sense of the community views the act as reprehensible, evil, and immoral. Violating material law is not always interpreted as violating written rules, it can be that the act is not written, but it is considered unlawful (against the law). In that position, the natural law stream became the foothold for the establishment of the concept against material law. Because the natural law school that builds its main thesis on lex naturalist always makes the principles of truth and justice the main benchmark in determining actions between good and bad, evil and not evil, and morals and immorality.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v4i12.2785
Published
2025-02-28
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI2785,
author = {Muammar Muammar},
title = {The Concept of Countering Material Law (Materiele Wederrechtelijk) And Its Relevance To The Natural Law Stream},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {4},
number = {12},
year = {2025},
keywords = {Against Material Law; Natural Law Streams; Lex Naturalis.},
abstract = {Introduction: The development of the concept of unlawfulness (wederrechtelijk) is interesting to accentuate, because unlawful is not only limited to unlawful in the formal sense, but also includes unlawful material law (materiele wederrechtelijk) which has abstract content, because unlawful material law can be interpreted even though the act does not violate the rules of criminal law.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to analyze how the relevance of the concept against material law (materiele wederrechtelijk) with the natural law stream that is in line and has an identity between the two.Methods of the Research: This paper uses a type of normative legal research. The approaches used in this paper are the conceptual approach, the theoretical approach, and the philosophical approach.Findings of the Research: The concept of material law is interpreted as not only violating the applicable legal rules. However, this is because an act is considered "against the law" from its origin. This means that the common sense of the community views the act as reprehensible, evil, and immoral. Violating material law is not always interpreted as violating written rules, it can be that the act is not written, but it is considered unlawful (against the law). In that position, the natural law stream became the foothold for the establishment of the concept against material law. Because the natural law school that builds its main thesis on lex naturalist always makes the principles of truth and justice the main benchmark in determining actions between good and bad, evil and not evil, and morals and immorality.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {905--915} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i12.2785},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2785}
}
A, Nursya. Beberapa Bentuk Perbuatan Pelaku Berkaitan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jakarta: CV Alumgadan Mandiri, 2020.
Aburaera, Sukarno, Muhadar, dan Maskun. Filsafat Hukum: Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.
Adabi, Muhammad Ikhwan, Chandra Darussman S, Apri Rotin Djusfi, Phoenna Ath Thariq, Eza Aulia, dan Jalaluddin Jalaluddin. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Materil Terhadap Tindakan Mengambil Brondolan Sawit (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Nagan Raya Desa Lamie).” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 5, no. 2 (2021): undefined-undefined. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v5i2.4416.
Adhari, Ade. “Konstitusionalitas Materiele Wederrechtelijk Dalam Kebijakan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Yudisial 11, no. 2 (2018): undefined-undefined. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i2.260.
Amrani, Hanafi. Politik pembaruan hukum pidana. Cetakan pertama. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2019.
Atmadja, I Dewa Gede, dan I Nyoman Putu Budiartha. Teori-Teori Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2018.
Effendi, Erdianto. “Tafsir Ayat Sifat Melawan Hukum Materil Yang Dilakukan Aparat Penegak Hukum Dalam Kaitan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 14, no. 02 (2018): 393–407. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v14i02.394.
Farkhani, Elviandri, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, dan Moch. Juli Pudjioo. Filsafat Hukum; Merangkai Paradigma Berfikir Hukum Post Modernisme. Solo: Kafilah Pubishing, 2018.
Hadiyanto, Alwan. “Pelaksanaan Dan Penerapan Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materil Dalam Perundang-Undangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” PETITA 4, no. 2 (2022): 160–74. https://doi.org/10.33373/pta.v4i2.4969.
Ilyas, Amir. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan (Disertai Teori-Teori Pengantar dan Beberapa Komentar). Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2012.
Junaidi, Muhammad. Ilmu Negara Sebuah Konstruksi Ideal Negara Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2016.
Kamarusdiana. Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press, 2018.
Knodel, Liudmyla. English for masters of law Philosophy of law. Kiev, 2015.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Pedoman Pengendalian Gratifikasi. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, 2015.
Maroni. Pengantar Politik Hukum Pidana. Bandar Lampung: CV. Anugrah Utama Raharja, 2016.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Rusli, Tami. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Lampung: Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL) Press, 2017.
Shalihah, Fithriatus. Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Shidarta. Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum (Buku 1: Akar Filosofis). Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.
Shidarta. “Menilik Kepantasan Labelisasi Pancasila sebagai Staatsfundamentalnorm dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Digest Epistema Berkala Isu Hukum dan Keadilan Eko-Sosial 4 (2013): 18–22.
———. Positivisme Hukum. Jakarta: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Tarumanagara, 2020.
Shidarta. “Makna Hakiki Subjek Hukum dan Subjek Norma.” ResearchGate, 3 Agustus 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355077336_Makna_Hakiki_Subjek_Hukum_dan_Subjek_Norma?enrichId=rgreq-fd7c4557b77590a29d151106b6a4aa93-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzM1NTA3NzMzNjtBUzoxMDc1NTU4MDU4MzA3NTg0QDE2MzM0NDQ0MzIyMDE%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf
———. “Sekali Lagi, tentang Keadilan.” ResearchGate, 15 Mei 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355565271_Sekali_Lagi_tentang_Keadilan?enrichId=rgreq-fd8d0e3ed980f51dc56cb46941fb0935-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzM1NTU2NTI3MTtBUzoxMDgyODQ2MzI4NDIyNDAwQDE2MzUxODIwOTE3ODk%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf.
———. “Subjek Norma Itu Apakah Sama dengan Subjek Kalimat?” ResearchGate, 10 Maret 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355834650_Subjek_Norma_Itu_Apakah_Sama_dengan_Subjek_Kalimat?enrichId=rgreq-d8ebe180cf7568b4122644a53d5ccc91-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzM1NTgzNDY1MDtBUzoxMDg1NDk1NTg1MDU0NzQ2QDE2MzU4MTM3MjM2MjQ%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf.
Sriwidodo, H. Joko. Politik Hukum Pidana Dalam Pendekatan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kepel Press, 2023.
Suhariyanto, Budi. “Putusan Pemidanaan Melebihi Tuntutan Dalam Perkara Korupsi Politik.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 1 (31 Mei 2019): 39–59. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.303.
Sulistyawan, Aditya Yuli. Argumentasi Hukum. Semarang: Penerbit Yoga Pratama, 2021.
Surohmat, Surohmat. “Pengaturan Ketentuan Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum.” Al-Qisth Law Review 5, no. 1 (Agustus 2021): 99. https://doi.org/10.24853/al-qisth.5.1.99-128.
Suryaningsi. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Samarinda: Mulawarman University Press, 2018.
Syarifuddin, Amir. “Filsafat Positivisme Dan Aliran Hukum Positif.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (2017): 1–22.
Tanya, Bernard L. “Pengembangan Epistemologi Ilmu Hukum.” Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Surakarta, 2015.
Wahyuni, Fitri. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Tangerang: PT Nusantara Persada Utama, 2017.
Wasitaatmadja, Fokky Fuad. Filsafat Hukum Rasionalisme dan Spiritualisme. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Vaniai, Amanda Vencly, Sayekti Putri Dayati, dan Erwin Kusumastuti. “Nilai-Nilai Etika, Akhlak Dan Moral Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa Dan Bernegara.” Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Isu-Isu Sosial 20, no. 1 (2022): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.37216/tadib.v20i1.537.
Yunus, Yanto, Juwita Sarri, dan Syahirudin Syahir. “Hilangnya Sifat Melawan Hukum Pidana Materil Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pasca Pengembalian Seluruh Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” Media Iuris 4, no. 2 (2021): 243–64. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v4i2.25457.
Yustisiani, Septri. “Pemberlakuan Sifat Melawan Hukum Materil Berfungsi Negatif Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi 7, no. 1 (2017): undefined-undefined. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v7i1.710.
: 201 times
Download : 106 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Muammar Muammar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
