Review of the Constitutional Court's Decision Number: 82/PUU-XII/2014 on Women's Representation in Parliament in the Perspective of Legal Feminism

(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Samarinda, Indonesia

(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Samarinda, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Samarinda, Indonesia

Abstract
Introduction: This study analyzes the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 82/PUU-XII/2014 which is a critical basis and an important basis for resolving the problem of women's representation in legislative institutions. Despite various legal provisions ensuring women's representation, challenges in practical implementation persist.
Purposes of the Research: The research aims to examine the Constitutional Court's reasoning on the concept of women's representation and assess the consistency of equality principles through the lens of legal feminism.
Methods of the Research: This study employs a normative juridical research method with a descriptive approach, focusing on the judicial interpretation of women's representation and its impact on affirmative policies in politics.
Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Decision Number: 82/PUU-XII/2014 reflects efforts to protect women's constitutional rights by reinforcing the phrase "prioritizing women's representation," despite its lack of explicit regulation. The study also indicates that the Constitutional Court consistently applies legal feminism principles to ensure equal opportunities in legislative institutions. However, the repeal of gender affirmative measures in Law Number: 17 of 2014 on MD3 has led to legal uncertainty, disadvantaging women.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v4i12.2838
Published
2025-02-28
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI2838, author = {Alisa Zahra Fitriana and Ikhwanul Muslim and Aullia Vivi Yulianingrum}, title = {Review of the Constitutional Court's Decision Number: 82/PUU-XII/2014 on Women's Representation in Parliament in the Perspective of Legal Feminism}, journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum}, volume = {4}, number = {12}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Women's Representation; Legal Feminism; Gender Equality.}, abstract = {Introduction: This study analyzes the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 82/PUU-XII/2014 which is a critical basis and an important basis for resolving the problem of women's representation in legislative institutions. Despite various legal provisions ensuring women's representation, challenges in practical implementation persist.Purposes of the Research: The research aims to examine the Constitutional Court's reasoning on the concept of women's representation and assess the consistency of equality principles through the lens of legal feminism.Methods of the Research: This study employs a normative juridical research method with a descriptive approach, focusing on the judicial interpretation of women's representation and its impact on affirmative policies in politics.Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Decision Number: 82/PUU-XII/2014 reflects efforts to protect women's constitutional rights by reinforcing the phrase "prioritizing women's representation," despite its lack of explicit regulation. The study also indicates that the Constitutional Court consistently applies legal feminism principles to ensure equal opportunities in legislative institutions. However, the repeal of gender affirmative measures in Law Number: 17 of 2014 on MD3 has led to legal uncertainty, disadvantaging women.}, issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {932--944} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v4i12.2838}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2838} }
Asshiddiqie, Jimmly. Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010.
Azizah, Nur. “Aliran Feminis dan Teori Kesetaraan Gender dalam Hukum.” SPECTRUM: Journal of Gender and Children Studies 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30984/spectrum.v1i1.163.
DD, Rapita. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait Pelaksanaan Pileg dan Pilpres Tahun 2014 dan 2019.” Skripsi, Universitas Brawijaya, 2014.
Dhea Ningrumsari, Fenita, Nur Azisa, and Wiwie Heryani. “Paradigma Teori Hukum Feminis Terhadap Peraturan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Seksual Di Indonesia the Paradigm of Feminist Legal Theory To Legal Protection Regulations for Women As Victims of Sexual Violence in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law. E-ISSN 14, no. 2 (2022): 2022–2103. https://kekerasan.kemenpppa.go.id/ringkasan,.
Fauziah, Marsyifa Novia, Mochamad Faizal Rizki, dan Rachmat Ramdani. “Tantangan Keterwakilan Perempuan dalam Politik Formal.” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja 49, no. 1 (2023): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipwp.v49i1.3034.
Finaka, Andrean W., et al. “37,7% Calon Legislatif di Pemilu 2024 adalah Perempuan.” Indonesiabaik.id. https://indonesiabaik.id/infografis/377-calon-legislatif-di-pemilu-2024-adalah-perempuan.
F C, Farisa. “KPU Bakal Pertahankan Aturan soal Jumlah Keterwakilan Perempuan di DPR.” Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/07/26/11285161/kpu-bakal-pertahankan-aturan-soal-jumlah-keterwakilan-perempuan-di-dpr.
Habi, Nuraida Fitri, “Mengapa Kuota Keterwakilan 30% Perempuan Dalam Pemilu Penting?”, fsy.uinjambi (2023), https://fsy.uinjambi.ac.id/mengapa-kuota-keterwakilan-30-perempuan-dalam-pemilu-penting.
Hadiyono, Venatius. “Memaknai Perempuan dalam Kursi Parlemen.” Kisi Hukum 14, no. 1 (2015): 7–25.
Hardjaloka, Loura. “Potret Keterwakilan Perempuan dalam Wajah Politik Indonesia Perspektif.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 2 (2012): 404–30.
Hasibuan, M. Fadly, dan Iza Rumesten. “Reorientasi Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi Berdasarkan Prinsip Supremasi Konstitusi.” Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan 22, no. 2 (2023): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v22i2.2713.
Herien, Puspitawati. “Pengenalan Konsep Gender, Kesetaraan Dan Keadilan Gender.” Makalah Yang Disajikan Pada Rapat Koordinasi Kesetaraan Gender Se Wilayah 1, 2015.
J, Rahmat Wijayanto. “Analisis Gender Dalam Bingkai Kewarganegaraan Dan Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Qistie 10, no. 2 (2017): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v10i2.2007.
Kendar, Umi Kalsum. “International Women’s Day dan Keterwakilan Perempuan Indonesia dalam Parlemen.” Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2024/03/08/hari-perempuan-internasional-dan-keterwakilan-perempuan-indonesia-dalam-parlemen. Diakses pada 18/12/2024 pukul 16.09 WITA.
Kiftiyah, Anifatul. “Perempuan Dalam Partisipasi Politik Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Yuridis 6, no. 2 (2019): 55. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v6i2.874.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum, “Lampiran Keputusan KPU No 1318/PL.01.9-Kpt/06/KPU/ VIII/2019 Tentang Penetapan Calon Terpilih Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019,” 2019.
Maruarar, Siahaan. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Muslim, Ikhwanul. Kupas Tuntas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Pencalonan Kepala Daerah. Deepublish, 2023.
Muslim, Ikhwanul, Hasanuddin, and Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi. "Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Batas Usia Calon Presiden Dan Calon Wakil Presiden Sebagai Landmark Decision." Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Eksakta 4, no. 1 (2024): 88-97.
Nurcahyo, Abraham. “Relevansi Budaya Patriarki Dengan Partisipasi Politik Dan Keterwakilan Perempuan Di Parlemen (The Relevance of Patriarchal Culture to Women’s Political Participation and Representation in Parliament).” Agastya: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Pembelajarannya 6, no. 01 (2016): 25.
Umagapi, Juniar Laraswanda. “Representasi Perempuan Di Parlemen Hasil PEMILU 2019 : Tantangan Dan Peluang.” Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI, 2020, 21.
Parwati, Theresia, and Kuspuji Istiningdiah. “Partisipasi Dan Komunikasi Politik Perempuan Di Legislatif Menurut Kacamata Politisi Perempuan Di Indonesia.” Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 9, no. 2 (2021): 119–29. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.9.2.119-129.
Rasyidin, dan Fidhia Aruni. Gender dan Politik: Keterwakilan Wanita dalam Politik. Unimal Press, 2016.
Rifai, Ahmad. Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Grafiti, 2011.
Rodiyah, Isnaini. “Keterwakilan Perempuan Dalam Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah.” JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik) 1, no. 1 (2013): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v1i1.427.
Savitri, Niken. Feminist Legal Theory dalam Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2006.
Sidik, Parid. “Keterwakilan Perempuan Dalam Politik Di Indonesia Perspektif Legal Feminism.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 11, no. 1 (2019): 1–14. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI.
Sulaiman, King Faisal. Teori dan Hukum Konstitusi. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019.
Triantono. “Feminis Legal Theory Dalam Kerangka Hukum.” Progressive Law and Society (PLS) 1, no. 1 (2023): 14–26.
Yusuf, Helmi. “Partisipasi Perempuan Dalam Pemilu 2024: Komparasi Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Feminisme.” Qonuni: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pengkajian Islam 3, no. 2 (2023): 58–71. https://doi.org/10.59833/qonuni.v3i2.1658.Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Alisa Zahra Fitriana, Ikhwanul Muslim, Aullia Vivi Yulianingrum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.