Auction Procedure for Dependent Rights as an Effort to Resolve Non-Litigation of Non-Performing Loans by Banks
), Diana Ria Winanti Napitupulu(2)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Non-performing loans are a major challenge in banking operations that can affect the financial stability and operational performance of banks. One of the non-litigation solutions pursued by banks to resolve such issues is through the auction of mortgage rights over the debtor's collateral.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine in detail the procedure for conducting mortgage right auctions as a means of resolving non-performing loans and to assess their effectiveness in providing legal protection for banks.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and case study approach. Normative Juridical Approach is chosen because the main focus of the research is to analyze and examine the applicable legal norms related to the procedure of mortgage right auctions as a solution for resolving non-performing loans.
Findings of the Research: The results show that the auction of mortgage rights is carried out through the State Assets and Auction Service Office (KPKNL) based on Law Number 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights and relevant Minister of Finance Regulations. The procedure includes stages such as notification, collateral assessment, auction announcement, auction execution, and distribution of auction proceeds. Although this process offers a more efficient alternative compared to litigation, practical obstacles still exist, such as debtor objections, lengthy auction processes, and administrative hurdles. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and improved coordination between banks, KPKNL, and relevant parties are necessary to enhance the effectiveness of mortgage right auctions as a non-litigation solution for non-performing loans.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.2993
Published
2025-07-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI2993,
author = {Taufiq Taufiq and Diana Napitupulu},
title = {Auction Procedure for Dependent Rights as an Effort to Resolve Non-Litigation of Non-Performing Loans by Banks},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {5},
number = {5},
year = {2025},
keywords = {Mortgage Right Auction; Non-Performing Loans; Non-Litigation Resolution; Bank.},
abstract = {Introduction: Non-performing loans are a major challenge in banking operations that can affect the financial stability and operational performance of banks. One of the non-litigation solutions pursued by banks to resolve such issues is through the auction of mortgage rights over the debtor's collateral.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine in detail the procedure for conducting mortgage right auctions as a means of resolving non-performing loans and to assess their effectiveness in providing legal protection for banks.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and case study approach. Normative Juridical Approach is chosen because the main focus of the research is to analyze and examine the applicable legal norms related to the procedure of mortgage right auctions as a solution for resolving non-performing loans.Findings of the Research: The results show that the auction of mortgage rights is carried out through the State Assets and Auction Service Office (KPKNL) based on Law Number 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights and relevant Minister of Finance Regulations. The procedure includes stages such as notification, collateral assessment, auction announcement, auction execution, and distribution of auction proceeds. Although this process offers a more efficient alternative compared to litigation, practical obstacles still exist, such as debtor objections, lengthy auction processes, and administrative hurdles. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and improved coordination between banks, KPKNL, and relevant parties are necessary to enhance the effectiveness of mortgage right auctions as a non-litigation solution for non-performing loans.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {223--238} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.2993},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2993}
}
Amalia, Nurul & Putra, Aditya Dwi. (2019). Prinsip Good Governance dalam Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Jaminan. Jakarta: Pustaka Hukum Nasional.
Amalia, R. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Hukum, 8(2), 109–122.
Anshari, M. F. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Lelang Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Sesuai Prosedur (Analisis Putusan Nomor 110/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn). Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(2), 447–459.
Anwar, M. (2018). Analisis efektivitas prosedur lelang sebagai solusi alternatif penyelesaian kredit bermasalah. Jakarta: Penerbit Hukum Indonesia.
Ardiyani, D. (2018). Penerapan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Parate Executie Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 134/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Bks). Jurnal Magister Hukum, 7(3), 269–280.
Arifin, Z. (2022). Koordinasi antara bank dan KPKNL dalam pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan. Jurnal Hukum Perbankan, 14(2), 123-135.
Azhari, Fadhlan. (2021). Peranan KPKNL dalam Proses Eksekusi Jaminan Kredit melalui Lelang. Medan: Cahaya Ilmu Press.
Basri, Harun. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kredit Bermasalah melalui Alternatif Non-Litigasi. Jakarta: Nuansa Aksara.
Dewi, Lestari. (2018). Analisis Efektivitas Parate Eksekusi dalam Lelang Objek Hak Tanggungan. Bandung: Fokus Hukum Press.
Fadillah, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dan debitur dalam proses lelang hak tanggungan. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 21(1), 45-60.
Fadillah, S. N. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Pasal 6 Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 2(1), 67–86.
Fitriani, Siti. (2022). Analisis Kredit Bermasalah dan Upaya Penyelesaiannya oleh Perbankan Nasional. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Gunawan, A. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Media Online. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(3), 515–529.
Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2022). Akibat Hukum Jual Beli Objek Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Dilakukan Di Hadapan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 3(2), 329–334.
Hasibuan, T. (2020). Mekanisme hukum lelang hak tanggungan sebagai solusi non-litigasi. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 18(3), 67-80.
Hendrawan, A. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan (APHT) Atas Objek Yang Tidak Memenuhi Syarat. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, 2(2), 209–217.
Hendrawan, Dedy. (2021). Strategi Bank dalam Menghadapi Kredit Macet Melalui Pendekatan Non-Litigasi. Surabaya: Media Hukum Press.
Hidayat, Muhammad. (2019). Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Jaminan antara Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Husni, A. (2020). Pendekatan normatif dalam penelitian hukum: Studi kasus lelang hak tanggungan. Bandung: Pustaka Hukum Nasional.
Irwansyah, Ahmad. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Iskandar, D. (2020). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Lelang Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Memenuhi Unsur Itikad Baik (Good Faith). Jurnal Yuridis, 7(2), 413–430.
Ismail, R. (2021). Prosedur pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan melalui KPKNL. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 19(4), 89-102.
Kartika, Meilani. (2022). Relevansi Hukum Jaminan dalam Mendukung Kredit Perbankan. Malang: Literasi Yustisia.
Latifah, M. (2022). Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan Melalui Lelang Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(3), 421-434.
Lestari, Dian. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan oleh Kreditur Tanpa Putusan Pengadilan. Surabaya: Asta Media.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mawardi, Ahmad. (2023). Kendala Administratif dalam Proses Lelang oleh KPKNL. Jakarta: Sinar Hukum Press.
Mulyani, Eka. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pembeli Objek Lelang Hak Tanggungan. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Nasution, Chairul. (2018). Hukum Lelang di Indonesia: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Nuraini, S. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Dilakukan Di Bawah Harga Pasar. Jurnal Lex Lata, 5(1), 177–194.
Nurjanah, L. (2021). Faktor penyebab kredit bermasalah di perbankan nasional. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 15(3), 145-157.
OJK (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan). (2018). Klasifikasi kredit bermasalah di Indonesia. Jakarta: OJK Press.
OJK (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan). (2023). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: OJK Press.
Prasetyo, B. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Memenuhi Syarat Formil. Jurnal Verstek, 9(1), 103–117.
Prasetyo, Yudha. (2019). Optimalisasi E-Auction dalam Proses Lelang Jaminan oleh KPKNL. Semarang: Pustaka Semesta.
Putra, A., & Rachmadi, D. (2019). Strategi non-litigasi dalam penyelesaian kredit bermasalah di perbankan. Jurnal Manajemen Risiko, 12(2), 78-90.
Putri, A., & Ramadhan, T. (2022). Harmonisasi regulasi pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Nasional, 10(1), 33-47.
Putri, R. A. (2019). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Apabila Debitur Pailit. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 3(1), 49–65.
Rahayu, Sinta. (2020). Hak Tanggungan sebagai Instrumen Eksekusi Kredit Bermasalah di Indonesia. Malang: Literasi Nusantara.
Rahmawati, D. (2021). Pengaruh kelengkapan dokumen terhadap keberhasilan lelang hak tanggungan. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 14(2), 56-70.
Ramadhani, R. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Objeknya Dikuasai Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(1), 1–18.
Ramadhani, Riska. (2022). Sinergi Lembaga dalam Pelaksanaan Lelang Hak Tanggungan: Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Rohmah, N. (2018). Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Hukum, 8(1), 1–14.
Saputra, I. W. G. L. A. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(1), 129–135.
Saragih, F. (2018). Hak eksekutorial kreditur berdasarkan UU No. 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Hukum Agraria, 16(3), 112-125.
Sari, N. (2020). Karakteristik kredit bermasalah dan dampaknya terhadap stabilitas keuangan bank. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 24(1), 89-103.
Sihombing, E. Z. (2020). Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Lelang Hak Tanggungan. Jakarta: Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Siregar, B. R. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Lelang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah, 19(3), 338–349.
Susanti, E., & Efendi, R. (2022). Pendekatan studi kasus dalam penelitian hukum perbankan. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga Press.
Susanti, F. (2020). Akibat Hukum Pelaksanaan Lelang Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Diumumkan Dalam Surat Kabar Harian. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 88–103.
Susanti, Rina. (2018). Hukum Perbankan: Teori dan Praktik Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sutrisno, H. (2018). Edukasi debitur untuk mencegah resistensi terhadap pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan. Jurnal Sosial dan Hukum, 11(3), 78-90.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.
Wibowo, A., & Hidayat, M. (2019). Dampak kredit bermasalah terhadap stabilitas sistem keuangan nasional. Jurnal Ekonomi Makro, 18(4), 34-50.
Wibowo, Andika. (2022). Strategi Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah dan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Debitur dan Kreditur. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wibowo, T. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Non Performing Loan (NPL) pada Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia Periode 2014-2018. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 23(1), 55-72.
Wulandari, D. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Lelang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan. Jurnal Justitia, 4(1), 1–14.
Yuliana, Diah. (2023). Peningkatan Kompetensi Hukum Petugas Kredit dalam Penanganan Eksekusi Jaminan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Yuliana, S. (2021). Teknik wawancara dalam pengumpulan data hukum perbankan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Perbankan Nasional, 15(4), 89-102.
Yuliana, S., & Maulida, R. (2020). Hambatan pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan di lapangan. Jurnal Hukum Praktis, 13(2), 101-115.
: 8 times
Download : 4 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Auction Procedure for Dependent Rights as an Effort to Resolve Non-Litigation of Non-Performing Loans by Banks |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Taufiq Taufiq; Faculty of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Diana Ria Winanti Napitupulu; Faculty of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Mortgage Right Auction; Non-Performing Loans; Non-Litigation Resolution; Bank. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Non-performing loans are a major challenge in banking operations that can affect the financial stability and operational performance of banks. One of the non-litigation solutions pursued by banks to resolve such issues is through the auction of mortgage rights over the debtor's collateral.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine in detail the procedure for conducting mortgage right auctions as a means of resolving non-performing loans and to assess their effectiveness in providing legal protection for banks.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and case study approach. Normative Juridical Approach is chosen because the main focus of the research is to analyze and examine the applicable legal norms related to the procedure of mortgage right auctions as a solution for resolving non-performing loans.Findings of the Research: The results show that the auction of mortgage rights is carried out through the State Assets and Auction Service Office (KPKNL) based on Law Number 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights and relevant Minister of Finance Regulations. The procedure includes stages such as notification, collateral assessment, auction announcement, auction execution, and distribution of auction proceeds. Although this process offers a more efficient alternative compared to litigation, practical obstacles still exist, such as debtor objections, lengthy auction processes, and administrative hurdles. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and improved coordination between banks, KPKNL, and relevant parties are necessary to enhance the effectiveness of mortgage right auctions as a non-litigation solution for non-performing loans. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2025-07-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/2993 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.2993 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Volume 5 Issue 5, July 2025 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Taufiq Taufiq, Diana Ria Winanti Napitupulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
