Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding

Putri Rahma Efendi(1email), Indung Wijayanto(2)


(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia orcid
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: This article will discuss the criminal law formulation policy related to self-abuse of narcotics in the present and future.

Purposes of the Research: This article aims to evaluate the application of the health approach to drug abuse treatment under positive law, identify obstacles to implementation, and provide recommendations for regulatory reform to optimize the handling of these cases and reduce overcrowding in correctional institutions.

Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this study is normative juridical research or normative legal research using a statutory approach (statue approach) and a comparative approach (comparative approach). The statutory approach is carried out by examining Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, SEMA Number 4 of 2010, and Regulation of the Attorney General Number PER-29/A/JA/12/2015. Meanwhile, the comparative approach is carried out by comparing regulations governing the abuse of narcotics for oneself in countries that have similar legal systems to Indonesia, namely Madagascar, Mexico, and Portugal. The data used is obtained from secondary data sourced from library materials such as official documents, books, research results in the form of reports, and documents relating to self-abuse of narcotics.

Findings of the Research: This study found that the policy on narcotics abuse for oneself based on positive law currently uses a health approach, but in its enforcement it is still not optimally implemented. There are still many law enforcement officials who have the understanding that the criminal act of narcotics abuse for oneself is a crime that must be subject to imprisonment. This is what makes prisons in Indonesia overcrowded because most of them are inhabited by prisoners of narcotics crimes. This study recommends the need to reform future regulations regarding the abuse of narcotics for oneself as an effort to prevent prison overcrowding.


Keywords


Legal Protection; Traditional Knowledge; Sui Generis.


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094

Published


2025-07-31

How To Cite


APA: Efendi, P.R., & Wijayanto, I. (2025). Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(5), 239-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094.
IEEE: P.R. Efendi, and I. Wijayanto, "Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 239-251, Jul. 2025. Accessed on: Aug. 17, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094
Harvard: Efendi, P.R., and Wijayanto, I., (2025). "Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 5(5), pp. 239-251. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094 (Accessed on: 17 August 2025)
Chicago: Efendi, Putri Rahma, and Indung Wijayanto. "Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 5 (July 31, 2025): 239-251. Accessed August 17, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094
Vancouver: Efendi PR, Wijayanto I. Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2025 Jul 31 [cited 2025 Aug 17];5(5):239-251. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094
MLA 8th: Efendi, Putri Rahma, and Indung Wijayanto. "Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 5, no. 5, 31 Jul. 2025, pp. 239-251, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI3094,
		author = {Putri Efendi and Indung Wijayanto},
		title = {Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {5},
		number = {5},
		year = {2025},
		keywords = {Legal Protection; Traditional Knowledge; Sui Generis.},
		abstract = {Introduction: This article will discuss the criminal law formulation policy related to self-abuse of narcotics in the present and future.Purposes of the Research: This article aims to evaluate the application of the health approach to drug abuse treatment under positive law, identify obstacles to implementation, and provide recommendations for regulatory reform to optimize the handling of these cases and reduce overcrowding in correctional institutions.Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this study is normative juridical research or normative legal research using a statutory approach (statue approach) and a comparative approach (comparative approach). The statutory approach is carried out by examining Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, SEMA Number 4 of 2010, and Regulation of the Attorney General Number PER-29/A/JA/12/2015. Meanwhile, the comparative approach is carried out by comparing regulations governing the abuse of narcotics for oneself in countries that have similar legal systems to Indonesia, namely Madagascar, Mexico, and Portugal. The data used is obtained from secondary data sourced from library materials such as official documents, books, research results in the form of reports, and documents relating to self-abuse of narcotics.Findings of the Research: This study found that the policy on narcotics abuse for oneself based on positive law currently uses a health approach, but in its enforcement it is still not optimally implemented. There are still many law enforcement officials who have the understanding that the criminal act of narcotics abuse for oneself is a crime that must be subject to imprisonment. This is what makes prisons in Indonesia overcrowded because most of them are inhabited by prisoners of narcotics crimes. This study recommends the need to reform future regulations regarding the abuse of narcotics for oneself as an effort to prevent prison overcrowding.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {239--251}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/3094}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Aime, Andrianantenaina Fanirintsoa, and Dwiki Oktobrian. “Policy Formulation on Criminal Legal Sanctions for Narcotics Crimes : Comparison Studi in Indonesia and Madagascar.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 6, no. 1 (2025): 38–47.

Akrom, Choirul Nur, R. Octavianus, Nirwan Nirwan, Muhammad Arif Syah Putra, and Windi Arista. “Analisis Hukum Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Oleh Hakim Ditinjau Dari Sema Nomor 4 Tahun 2010 Di Kota Palembang.” Lexstricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 3 (2024): 149–62. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v2i3.33.

Atmadja, I Dewa Gede, and I Nyoman Putu Budiartha. Teori-Teori Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2018.

Atmasasmita, Romli. Masalah Santunan Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman RI, 1992.

BNN. “HANI 2024: Masyarakat Bergerak, Bersama Melawan Narkoba Mewujudkan Indonesia Bersinar.” bnn.go.id, 2024. https://bnn.go.id/hani-2024-masyarakat-bergerak-bersama-melawan-narkoba-mewujudkan-indonesia-bersinar/.

Bumi, Salyo Kinasih, Supolo Supolo, and Bastianto Nugroho. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 2 (2022): 351–64. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.1860.

Burmawi, A Gamal. “Reformulasi Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Penyalah Guna Narkotika Golongan I" Ganja".” Hangoluan Law Review 3, no. November (2024): 429–45. https://repository.unja.ac.id/62266/%0Ahttps://repository.unja.ac.id/62266/1/TESIS-ADITYA GAMAL BURMAWI-P2B120093.pdf.

Fajar, Mohamad. “Penerapan Rehabilitasi Medis Dan Rehabilitasi Sosial Atas Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Bagi Diri Sendiri Mohamad.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Teknologi (SOSTECH) 2, no. 5 (2022).

Huda, Mohammad Nurul. “Korban Dalam Perspektif Viktimologi.” VOICE JUSTISIA : Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 6, no. 1 (2022): 63–69. https://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/justisia/article/view/1526.

Laqueur, Hannah. “Uses and Abuses of Drug Decriminalization in Portugal.” Law and Social Inquiry 40, no. 3 (2015): 746–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12104.

Meiranda, Andi Luffi, and Rehnalemken Ginting. “Implementasi Hak Rehabilitasi Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Bagi Diri Sendiri (Studi Putusan NOMOR: 653/PID.SUS/2018/PT.MKS).” Recidive 10, no. 1 (2021): 53–58.

Munawaroh, Nafiatul. “Apa Itu SEMA Dan Bagaimana Kedudukannya Dalam Hukum?” hukumonline.com, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/apa-itu-sema-dan-bagaimana-kedudukannya-dalam-hukum-lt5da3d5db300a9/.

Ningsih, Tri Wahyu, Nandarista Tama, Aullia Syahrani, and Asmak Ul Hosnah. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dan Pengaturan Hukum Serta Perlindungannya Menurut KUHP.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 8, no. 1 (2024): 16499–503.

Pakpahan, Hatarto. “Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Tindakan Bagi Pengguna Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Arena Hukum 7, no. 2 (2014): 225–46. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00702.5.

Panjaitan, Budi Sastra. “Tindak Pidana Tanpa Korban.” Jurnal Mercatoria 15, no. 1 (2022): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v15i1.6197.

Pasaribu, Francisco Lundu Hesekhel, Siti Marwiyah, Wahyu Prawesthi, and Bachrul Amiq. “Keadilan Restoratif Pada Tingkat Penyidikan Bagi Pecandu Narkotika Dan Korban Penyalahguna Narkotika.” COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 4, no. 3 (2024): 11–23.

Ridho Sinaga, Muhammad, and Nuchraha Alhuda Hasnda. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 4, no. 1 (2022): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v4i1.97.

Rizaldi, Bagus Ahmad. “Kemenkumham: 52,97 Persen Penghuni Penjara Dari Kasus Narkoba.” antaranews.com, 2024. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4071018/kemenkumham-5297-persen-penghuni-penjara-dari-kasus-narkoba.

Samara, Finsensius, Ernesto J.Danggur, Mario Efren Yamba Kodi, and Markus Beda Baon. “Menganalisi Lima Kasus Residevis Di Indonesia.” Prestisius Hukum Brilliance 6, no. 3 (2024): 45–58.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2015.

Soraya, Joice. Viktimologi: Kajian Dalam Perspektif Korban Kejahatan. Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2022.

Sulung Faturachman. “Sejarah Dan Perkembangan Masuknya Narkoba Di Indonesia.” HISTORIS : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah 5, no. 1 (2020): 13–19. https://doi.org/http://www.sejarahkita.web.id/2013/01/sejarah-dan-perkembangan-microsoft.html.

Syawal, Muh. “Kebijakan Penjatuhan Pidana Penjara Terhadap Penyalahguna Narktotika Perbandingan Negara Indonesia Dan Malaysia.” Proceedings of Airlangga Faculty of Law Colloquium 1, no. 1 (2024): 308–17.

Tim Redaksi Kompas. “Seberapa Sesak Lapas Di Indonesia?” kompas.id, 2025. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/seberapa-sesak-lapas-di-indonesia.

Wirayuda, Haris, Anak Agung, Sagung Laksmi, Made Minggu Widyantara, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Warmadewa. “Upaya Rehabilitasi Bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika Oleh” 3, no. 2 (2022): 252–58.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 24 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 12 times



 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Criminal Law Formulation Policy for Self-abuse of Narcotics as an Effort to Prevent Prison Overcrowding
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Putri Rahma Efendi; Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Indung Wijayanto; Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang; Indonesia orcid
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Legal Protection; Traditional Knowledge; Sui Generis.
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: This article will discuss the criminal law formulation policy related to self-abuse of narcotics in the present and future.Purposes of the Research: This article aims to evaluate the application of the health approach to drug abuse treatment under positive law, identify obstacles to implementation, and provide recommendations for regulatory reform to optimize the handling of these cases and reduce overcrowding in correctional institutions.Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this study is normative juridical research or normative legal research using a statutory approach (statue approach) and a comparative approach (comparative approach). The statutory approach is carried out by examining Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, SEMA Number 4 of 2010, and Regulation of the Attorney General Number PER-29/A/JA/12/2015. Meanwhile, the comparative approach is carried out by comparing regulations governing the abuse of narcotics for oneself in countries that have similar legal systems to Indonesia, namely Madagascar, Mexico, and Portugal. The data used is obtained from secondary data sourced from library materials such as official documents, books, research results in the form of reports, and documents relating to self-abuse of narcotics.Findings of the Research: This study found that the policy on narcotics abuse for oneself based on positive law currently uses a health approach, but in its enforcement it is still not optimally implemented. There are still many law enforcement officials who have the understanding that the criminal act of narcotics abuse for oneself is a crime that must be subject to imprisonment. This is what makes prisons in Indonesia overcrowded because most of them are inhabited by prisoners of narcotics crimes. This study recommends the need to reform future regulations regarding the abuse of narcotics for oneself as an effort to prevent prison overcrowding.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-07-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/3094
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v5i5.3094
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Volume 5 Issue 5, July 2025
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Putri Rahma Efendi, Indung Wijayanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.