Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb

Devi Neng Hartanti; Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu; Iqbal Taufik

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553

Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb

Devi Neng Hartanti⁽¹⁾, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu⁽²⁾, Iqbal Taufik⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The criminal act of embezzlement by weight, namely where the perpetrator of the wrongdoing or the act is very diverse. Not only taking money and making false reports, but the perpetrators also have a burden of responsibility in the form of special elements that are burdensome and also family. This article analyzes the application of criminal law against the perpetrators of embezzlement of cash on delivery (COD) in court decision number 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb.

Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to analyze and discuss the legal considerations of the judge in making a verdict on the criminal act of embezzling Cash On Delivery (COD).

Methods of the Research: The research method in this writing uses a normative juridical research type because the focus of the study departs from the analysis of the judge's decision, using the following approaches: statute approach and case approach. Legal material collection techniques use library research techniques, as well as legal material analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, it was found that the application of criminal law against the criminal act of embezzlement of cash on delivery (COD) in decision Number 139/Pid.B /2020/PN.Amb that the article charged by the public prosecutor against the defendant was Article 374 of the ciminal code. it has been proven that all the elements contained in the article have been fulfilled, the verdict handed down by the judge, namely imprisonment for 2 (two) years and 7 (seven) months, is lower than the criminal threat in the demands of the public prosecutor, namely 4 (four) 6 (six) months and Article 374 of the ciminal code, namely the maximum imprisonment of 5 (five) years. The legal basis for the judge's consideration in making a decision on the crime of embezzlement of cash on delivery (COD) in decision number 139/Pid.B/ 2020/PN.Amb is juridical and non-juridical considerations

Keywords

Criminal act; Embezzlement; Cash on delivery

How To Cite

APA: Hartanti, D.N., Titahelu, J.A., & Taufik, I. (2021). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 110-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553.

IEEE: D.N. Hartanti, J.A. Titahelu, and I. Taufik, "Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 110-124, May. 2021. Accessed on: Apr. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553

Harvard: Hartanti, D.N., Titahelu, J.A., and Taufik, I., (2021). "Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(2), pp. 110-124. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553 (Accessed on: 20 April 2024)

Chicago: Hartanti, Devi Neng, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Iqbal Taufik. "Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (April 30, 2021): 110-124. Accessed April 20, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553

Vancouver: Hartanti DN, Titahelu JA, Taufik I. Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 May 12 [cited 2024 Apr 20];1(2):110-124. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553

MLA 8th: Hartanti, Devi Neng, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Iqbal Taufik. "Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 2, 30 Apr. 2021, pp. 110-124, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553. Accessed 20 Apr. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI553,
		author = {Devi Hartanti and Juanrico Titahelu and Iqbal Taufik},
		title = {Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Cash On Delivery dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {2},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Criminal act; Embezzlement; Cash on delivery},
		abstract = {Introduction: The criminal act of embezzlement by weight, namely where the perpetrator of the wrongdoing or the act is very diverse. Not only taking money and making false reports, but the perpetrators also have a burden of responsibility in the form of special elements that are burdensome and also family. This article analyzes the application of criminal law against the perpetrators of embezzlement of cash on delivery (COD) in court decision number 139/Pid.B/2020/PN.Amb.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to analyze and discuss the legal considerations of the judge in making a verdict on the criminal act of embezzling Cash On Delivery (COD).Methods of the Research: The research method in this writing uses a normative juridical research type because the focus of the study departs from the analysis of the judge's decision, using the following approaches: statute approach and case approach. Legal material collection techniques use library research techniques, as well as legal material analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, it was found that the application of criminal law against the criminal act of embezzlement of cash on delivery (COD) in decision Number 139/Pid.B /2020/PN.Amb that the article charged by the public prosecutor against the defendant was Article 374 of the ciminal code. it has been proven that all the elements contained in the article have been fulfilled, the verdict handed down by the judge, namely imprisonment for 2 (two) years and 7 (seven) months, is lower than the criminal threat in the demands of the public prosecutor, namely 4 (four) 6 (six) months and Article 374 of the ciminal code, namely the maximum imprisonment of 5 (five) years. The legal basis for the judge's consideration in making a decision on the crime of embezzlement of cash on delivery (COD) in decision number 139/Pid.B/ 2020/PN.Amb is juridical and non-juridical considerations},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {110--124}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i2.553},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/553}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Agustina, Hurip, Dadang Suprijatna, and Aal Lukmanul Hakim. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Yang Timbul Dari Hubungan Sewa Menyewa Mobil Dikaitkan Dengan Pasal 372 KUHP.” Jurnal Hukum De’rechtsstaat 1, no. 1 (2016): 201–16. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v2i2.675.

Anhar. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dengan Pemberatan Yang Dilakukan Secara Berlanjut (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Palu No.12/Pid.B/2009/PN.PL).” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion 2, no. 1 (2014): 1–12. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/147080-ID-tinjauan-yuridis-terhadap-tindak-pidana.pdf.

Ilyas, Amir. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKAP-Indonesia, 2012.

Jamhir, and Mustika Alhamra. “Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Hukum Positif Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Islam.” LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum 8, no. 1 (2019): 81–102. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v8i1.6441.

Kurniawan, Muhamad. “Penggelapan Uang Dan Surat Berharga Oleh Pegawai Negeri Sebagai Tindak Pidana Khusus Dalam Pasal 8 Undangundang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Lex Crimen 5, no. 5 (2016): 84–92.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.

Massie, Mahendri. “Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Menggunakan Jabatan Berdasarkan Pasal 415 KUHP.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 7 (2017): 101–7. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/17247.

Rumapea, Mazmur Septian. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penggelapan Uang Elektronik Dalam Transaksi Elektronik.” Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 18 (2019): 3. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1185.

Santoso, Topo. Kriminologi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.

Setiawan, Made Rony, A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi., and Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Situs Jual Beli Online.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2020): 124–29. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2198.124-129.

Sunarto, Kamanto. Pengantar Sosiologi. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi UI, 2000.

Supa’at, Muhari. “Proses Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Mobil Di Polres Pati (Studi Kasus Nomor BP/05/VIII/2017/Reskrim).” Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah 13, no. 1 (2018): 203–14. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jhku/article/view/2600.

Thezar, Muh., and St. Nurjannah. “Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan.” Alauddin Law Development Journal 2, no. 3 (2020): 328–38. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/aldev/article/view/14230.

Wijaya, Anthony. “Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Adw Dan Mbzm Terhadap Hasil Penggelapan Koperasi Su Ditinjau Dari Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Calyptra: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya 2, no. 2 (2014): 1–11. https://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/jimus/article/view/782.

Wiyanto, Roni. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2016.

Yanti, Riska. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Secara Berlanjut (Studi Kasus No. 55/Pid.B/2010/PN. Palu).” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion 1, no. 5 (2013): 1–10. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/151548-ID-pertimbangan-hakim-dalam-memutuskan-perk.pdf.

Zaidan, M Ali. Menuju Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015

Full Text: PDF