Urgensi Pengaturan Private Military Contractors (PMCs) Dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional
), Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena(2), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Private Military Contractors (PMCs) are private companies engaged in providing professional security and military services for profit. The involvement of its members in armed conflicts often results in unclear status in international humanitarian law, many assume that the PMC is the same as mercenaries. So we need in-depth analysis to distinguish the status of the two.
Purposes of the Research: To analyze the working time has been regulated in International Humanitarian Law, and the position of Private Military Contractors (PMCs) in International Humanitarian Law.
Methods of the Research: The method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is through literature study and then analyzed through a perspective using qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The results showed that the regulation on mercenaries explicitly existed only in Additional Protocol I of 1977. However, in fact, provisions that resemble mercenaries have been regulated in the 1907 Hague Convention and regulated in Geneva Convention III 1949 in this convention the term mercenary has been included. (Mercenary). The unclear legal status of PMCs members, especially when working in situations of armed conflict, puts them in a gray area which has the potential to cause debate about their presence in an armed conflict which also impacts the protection of their human rights. So far, many parties have identified members of Private Military Contractors (PMCs) with mercenaries, so that a stigma has emerged that calls them "reincarnations" of mercenaries (mercenaries / soldier of fortune / dogs of war). However, the concept of mercenaries as contained in Article 47 of Additional Protocol II 1977 cannot be applied optimally to PMCs, especially to determine their legal status when serving in situations of armed conflict.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.567
Published
2021-06-21
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI567,
author = {Elvira Liminanto and Josina Wattimena and Johanis Peilouw},
title = {Urgensi Pengaturan Private Military Contractors (PMCs) Dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {3},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Private Military Contractors (PMCs); International Humanitarian Law},
abstract = {Introduction: Private Military Contractors (PMCs) are private companies engaged in providing professional security and military services for profit. The involvement of its members in armed conflicts often results in unclear status in international humanitarian law, many assume that the PMC is the same as mercenaries. So we need in-depth analysis to distinguish the status of the two.Purposes of the Research: To analyze the working time has been regulated in International Humanitarian Law, and the position of Private Military Contractors (PMCs) in International Humanitarian Law.Methods of the Research: The method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is through literature study and then analyzed through a perspective using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results showed that the regulation on mercenaries explicitly existed only in Additional Protocol I of 1977. However, in fact, provisions that resemble mercenaries have been regulated in the 1907 Hague Convention and regulated in Geneva Convention III 1949 in this convention the term mercenary has been included. (Mercenary). The unclear legal status of PMCs members, especially when working in situations of armed conflict, puts them in a gray area which has the potential to cause debate about their presence in an armed conflict which also impacts the protection of their human rights. So far, many parties have identified members of Private Military Contractors (PMCs) with mercenaries, so that a stigma has emerged that calls them "reincarnations" of mercenaries (mercenaries / soldier of fortune / dogs of war). However, the concept of mercenaries as contained in Article 47 of Additional Protocol II 1977 cannot be applied optimally to PMCs, especially to determine their legal status when serving in situations of armed conflict.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {163--172} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.567},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/567}
}
Aditya, Geraldy Diandra, Soekotjo Hardiwinoto, and Joko Setiyono. “Peran Dan Status Private Military Companies Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Ditinjau Dari Hukum Humaniter Internasional.” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2017): 1–18. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/14371.
Agency, Tasnim News. “Pasukan Yaman Dan Komite Populer, Dalam Serangan Balasan Terhadap Pasukan Koalisi Yang Dipimpin Oleh Saudi, Berhasil Membunuh Puluhan Tentara Bayaran Rezim Riyadh Di Provinsi Hajj Dan Al-Jawf Di Negara Semenanjung Arab Tersebut.” matamatapolitik.com, 2017. https://www.matamatapolitik.com/puluhan-tentara-bayaran-saudi-tewas-di-yaman/.
Asmardika, Rahman. “Kronologi Konflik Yaman Hingga Kini.” news.okezone.com, 2015. https://news.okezone.com/read/2015/03/28/18/1125649/kronologi-konflik-yaman-hingga-kini.
Haryomataram, GPH. Sekelumit Tentang Hukum Humaniter. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press, 1994.
Isenberg, David. “Dogs of War: More Contractors in Iraq.” spacedaily.com, 2008. https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Dogs_of_War_More_contractors_in_Iraq_999.html.
Kwakwa, Edward K. The International Law of Armed Conflict : Personal and Material Fields of Application. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
Marniati. “UEA Dituduh Gunakan Tentara Bayaran Di Yaman.” republika.co.id, 2017. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/internasional/timur-tengah/17/11/29/p0628a366- uea-dituduh-gunakan-tentara-bayaran-di-yaman.
Permanasari, Arlina. Pengantar Hukum Humaniter. Jakarta: Jakarta International Committee of The Red Cross, 1999.
Rakowsky, Kateryna L. “Military Contractors and Civil Liability: Use of the Government Contractor Defense to Escape Allegations of Misconduct in Iraq and Afghanistan,” 2006.
Schreier, Fred, and Marina Caparini. “Privatising Security: Law, Practice and Governance of Private Military and Security Companies.” Geneva, 2005. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4488.0643.
Singer, Peter W. “Humanitarian Principles, Private Military Agents: Implications of the Privatized Military Industry for the Humanitarian Community.” The Brown Journal of World Affairs 13, no. 1 (2006): 105–21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24590647.
Terlikowski, Macin. “Private Military Companies in the US Stabilization Operation in Iraq,” 2008.
Wolf, Antenor Hallo De. “Modern Condottieri in Iraq: Privatizing War from the Perspective of International and Human Rights Law.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 13, no. 2 (2006): 315–56. https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2006.13.2.315.
: 3462 times
Download : 1978 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Elvira Liminanto, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
