Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan

Khafifa Kara Abnin(1email), Arman Anwar(2), Veriana Josepha Rehatta(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: This research discusses about application of distinction principle which has not been fully implemented in the Armenian-Azerbaijan armed conflict, which resulted in heavy casualties from the civilian population and caused damage to civilian objects as a result of the attacks launched on civilian areas in Nagorno-Karabakh by the armed forces of both countries.

Purposes of the Research: Know and study the regulation of distinction principle in Humanitarian Law and analyze the application of sanctions against Armenia-Azerbaijan for non-compliance with the distinction principle in the armed conflict of the two countries.

Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with legal materials used in the study are primary, secondary and tertiary with the use of literature study techniques.

Results of the Research: The results showed that the armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in fighting over the Nagorno-Karabakh region was not carried out by applying the distinction principle effectively. Therefore, if the two countries do not try the perpetrators of war crimes in their national courts, the International Court of justice (ICC) has the competence to try them and provide sanctions in the form of compensation payments to victims in accordance with article 75 of the 1998 Rome Statute as well as imprisonment and fines as well as confiscation of proceeds of crime under Article 77 of the Rome Statute 1998.

Keywords


Distinction Principle; Armenia-Azerbaijan Armed Conflict; sanction.


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569

Published


2021-06-21

How To Cite


APA: Abnin, K.K., Anwar, A., & Rehatta, V.J. (2021). Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(3), 180–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569.
IEEE: K.K. Abnin, A. Anwar, and V.J. Rehatta, "Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 180–191, Jun. 2021. Accessed on: Apr. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569
Harvard: Abnin, K.K., Anwar, A., and Rehatta, V.J., (2021). "Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(3), pp. 180–191. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569 (Accessed on: 19 April 2025)
Chicago: Abnin, Khafifa Kara, Arman Anwar, and Veriana Josepha Rehatta. "Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 3 (June 21, 2021): 180–191. Accessed April 19, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569
Vancouver: Abnin KK, Anwar A, Rehatta VJ. Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Jun 21 [cited 2025 Apr 19];1(3):180–191. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569
MLA 8th: Abnin, Khafifa Kara, Arman Anwar, and Veriana Josepha Rehatta. "Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 3, 21 Jun. 2021, pp. 180–191, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569. Accessed 19 Apr. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI569,
		author = {Khafifa Abnin and Arman Anwar and Veriana Rehatta},
		title = {Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {3},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Distinction Principle; Armenia-Azerbaijan Armed Conflict; sanction.},
		abstract = {Introduction: This research discusses about application of distinction principle which has not been fully implemented in the Armenian-Azerbaijan armed conflict, which resulted in heavy casualties from the civilian population and caused damage to civilian objects as a result of the attacks launched on civilian areas in Nagorno-Karabakh by the armed forces of both countries.Purposes of the Research: Know and study the regulation of distinction principle in Humanitarian Law and analyze the application of sanctions against Armenia-Azerbaijan for non-compliance with the distinction principle in the armed conflict of the two countries.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with legal materials used in the study are primary, secondary and tertiary with the use of literature study techniques.Results of the Research: The results showed that the armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in fighting over the Nagorno-Karabakh region was not carried out by applying the distinction principle effectively. Therefore, if the two countries do not try the perpetrators of war crimes in their national courts, the International Court of justice (ICC) has the competence to try them and provide sanctions in the form of compensation payments to victims in accordance with article 75 of the 1998 Rome Statute as well as imprisonment and fines as well as confiscation of proceeds of crime under Article 77 of the Rome Statute 1998.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {180--191}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/569}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Ambarwati, Denny Ramdhany, and Rina Rusman. Hukum Humanier Internasional Dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.

Bakri, Umar Suyardi. Hukum Humaniter Internasional Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2019.

Haryomataram, KGPH. Pengantar Hukum Humaniter. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Human Rights Watch. “Armenia: Cluster Munitions Used in Multiple Attacks on Azerbaijan.” hrw.org, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/12/15/armenia-cluster-munitions-used-multiple-attacks-azerbaijan.

———. “Armenia: Unlawful Rocket, Missile Strikes on Azerbaijan (Investigate Indiscriminate Attacks, Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas).” www.hrw.org, 2002. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/12/11/armenia-unlawful-rocket-missile-strikes-azerbaijan.

Lmahamad, Ayya. “Civilian Death Toll in Armenian Attacks Reaches 100.” Azernews, 2020. https://www.azernews.az/aggression/173628.html.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.

Naim, Ahmad Baharuddin. Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2010.

Nasution, Adam Soroinda. “Penggunaan Cluster Munitions Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Humaniter Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Intenasional Antara Israel Dan Hizbullah Pada Tahun 2006.” TerAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter 4, no. 6 (2008): 1067–89. https://doi.org/10.25105/teras-lrev.v4i6.5422.

Ramdhany, Denny, Heribertus Jaka Triyana Sefriani, and Yustina Trihoni Nalesti Dewi. Konteks Dan Perspektif Politik Terkait Hukum Humaniter Internasional Kontemporer. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.

Trend News Agency. “Azerbaijan Reveals Details of Casualties, Injuries in Tartar Inflicted by Armenian Troops.” Trend News Agency, 2020. https://en.trend.az/azerbaijan/politics/3326082.html.

Wagiman, Wahyu. Hukum Humaniter Dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Seri Bahan Bacaan Kursus HAM Untuk Pengacara. Jakarta: ELSAM, 2005.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1737 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 13299 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Khafifa Kara Abnin; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Arman Anwar; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Veriana Josepha Rehatta; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Distinction Principle; Armenia-Azerbaijan Armed Conflict; sanction.
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: This research discusses about application of distinction principle which has not been fully implemented in the Armenian-Azerbaijan armed conflict, which resulted in heavy casualties from the civilian population and caused damage to civilian objects as a result of the attacks launched on civilian areas in Nagorno-Karabakh by the armed forces of both countries.Purposes of the Research: Know and study the regulation of distinction principle in Humanitarian Law and analyze the application of sanctions against Armenia-Azerbaijan for non-compliance with the distinction principle in the armed conflict of the two countries.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with legal materials used in the study are primary, secondary and tertiary with the use of literature study techniques.Results of the Research: The results showed that the armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in fighting over the Nagorno-Karabakh region was not carried out by applying the distinction principle effectively. Therefore, if the two countries do not try the perpetrators of war crimes in their national courts, the International Court of justice (ICC) has the competence to try them and provide sanctions in the form of compensation payments to victims in accordance with article 75 of the 1998 Rome Statute as well as imprisonment and fines as well as confiscation of proceeds of crime under Article 77 of the Rome Statute 1998.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2021-06-21
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/569
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 3 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 3, Mei 2021
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Khafifa Kara Abnin, Arman Anwar, Veriana Josepha Rehatta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.