Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan
), Arman Anwar(2), Veriana Josepha Rehatta(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: This research discusses about application of distinction principle which has not been fully implemented in the Armenian-Azerbaijan armed conflict, which resulted in heavy casualties from the civilian population and caused damage to civilian objects as a result of the attacks launched on civilian areas in Nagorno-Karabakh by the armed forces of both countries.
Purposes of the Research: Know and study the regulation of distinction principle in Humanitarian Law and analyze the application of sanctions against Armenia-Azerbaijan for non-compliance with the distinction principle in the armed conflict of the two countries.
Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with legal materials used in the study are primary, secondary and tertiary with the use of literature study techniques.
Results of the Research: The results showed that the armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in fighting over the Nagorno-Karabakh region was not carried out by applying the distinction principle effectively. Therefore, if the two countries do not try the perpetrators of war crimes in their national courts, the International Court of justice (ICC) has the competence to try them and provide sanctions in the form of compensation payments to victims in accordance with article 75 of the 1998 Rome Statute as well as imprisonment and fines as well as confiscation of proceeds of crime under Article 77 of the Rome Statute 1998.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569
Published
2021-06-21
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI569,
author = {Khafifa Abnin and Arman Anwar and Veriana Rehatta},
title = {Pengaturan Prinsip Pembedaan dan Penerapannya dalam Konflik Armenia-Azerbaijan},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {3},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Distinction Principle; Armenia-Azerbaijan Armed Conflict; sanction.},
abstract = {Introduction: This research discusses about application of distinction principle which has not been fully implemented in the Armenian-Azerbaijan armed conflict, which resulted in heavy casualties from the civilian population and caused damage to civilian objects as a result of the attacks launched on civilian areas in Nagorno-Karabakh by the armed forces of both countries.Purposes of the Research: Know and study the regulation of distinction principle in Humanitarian Law and analyze the application of sanctions against Armenia-Azerbaijan for non-compliance with the distinction principle in the armed conflict of the two countries.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with legal materials used in the study are primary, secondary and tertiary with the use of literature study techniques.Results of the Research: The results showed that the armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in fighting over the Nagorno-Karabakh region was not carried out by applying the distinction principle effectively. Therefore, if the two countries do not try the perpetrators of war crimes in their national courts, the International Court of justice (ICC) has the competence to try them and provide sanctions in the form of compensation payments to victims in accordance with article 75 of the 1998 Rome Statute as well as imprisonment and fines as well as confiscation of proceeds of crime under Article 77 of the Rome Statute 1998.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {180--191} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.569},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/569}
}
Ambarwati, Denny Ramdhany, and Rina Rusman. Hukum Humanier Internasional Dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Bakri, Umar Suyardi. Hukum Humaniter Internasional Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2019.
Haryomataram, KGPH. Pengantar Hukum Humaniter. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.
Human Rights Watch. “Armenia: Cluster Munitions Used in Multiple Attacks on Azerbaijan.” hrw.org, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/12/15/armenia-cluster-munitions-used-multiple-attacks-azerbaijan.
———. “Armenia: Unlawful Rocket, Missile Strikes on Azerbaijan (Investigate Indiscriminate Attacks, Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas).” www.hrw.org, 2002. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/12/11/armenia-unlawful-rocket-missile-strikes-azerbaijan.
Lmahamad, Ayya. “Civilian Death Toll in Armenian Attacks Reaches 100.” Azernews, 2020. https://www.azernews.az/aggression/173628.html.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.
Naim, Ahmad Baharuddin. Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2010.
Nasution, Adam Soroinda. “Penggunaan Cluster Munitions Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Humaniter Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Intenasional Antara Israel Dan Hizbullah Pada Tahun 2006.” TerAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter 4, no. 6 (2008): 1067–89. https://doi.org/10.25105/teras-lrev.v4i6.5422.
Ramdhany, Denny, Heribertus Jaka Triyana Sefriani, and Yustina Trihoni Nalesti Dewi. Konteks Dan Perspektif Politik Terkait Hukum Humaniter Internasional Kontemporer. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.
Trend News Agency. “Azerbaijan Reveals Details of Casualties, Injuries in Tartar Inflicted by Armenian Troops.” Trend News Agency, 2020. https://en.trend.az/azerbaijan/politics/3326082.html.
Wagiman, Wahyu. Hukum Humaniter Dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Seri Bahan Bacaan Kursus HAM Untuk Pengacara. Jakarta: ELSAM, 2005.
: 1616 times
Download : 12935 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Khafifa Kara Abnin, Arman Anwar, Veriana Josepha Rehatta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
