Penggunaan Kekerasan Sebagai Cara Memperoleh Wilayah Bertentangan Dengan Hukum Internasional
), Arman Anwar(2), Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The territorial sovereignty of a country includes three dimensions, namely land, air and sea.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose and benefit of this research is to demonstrate the study and analysis of the rules of territorial control and international law.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this research is normative law which is sourced from primary and secondary legal materials whose data is collected through library research.
Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, it shows that the regulation of territorial control is regulated in international law but is prohibited if it is carried out by means of violence as stipulated in the UN Charter Article 2 paragraphs (3) and (4). The form of territorial conquest is currently strictly prohibited, this is emphasized in UN Security Council resolution 242 concerning the illegality of territorial control by war. The use of violence is only allowed in terms of self-defense, or based on the mandate of the UN Security Council for humanitarian purposes (humanitarian intervention). Apart from the above, in both classical international law and customary international law, the use of force and subjugation has not yet reached the stage of being prohibited.Keywords
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI606,
author = {Fahira Damura and Arman Anwar and Lucia Tahamata},
title = {Penggunaan Kekerasan Sebagai Cara Memperoleh Wilayah Bertentangan Dengan Hukum Internasional},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {4},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Violence; Territorial Control; International Law},
abstract = {Introduction: The territorial sovereignty of a country includes three dimensions, namely land, air and sea.Purposes of the Research: The purpose and benefit of this research is to demonstrate the study and analysis of the rules of territorial control and international law.Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this research is normative law which is sourced from primary and secondary legal materials whose data is collected through library research.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, it shows that the regulation of territorial control is regulated in international law but is prohibited if it is carried out by means of violence as stipulated in the UN Charter Article 2 paragraphs (3) and (4). The form of territorial conquest is currently strictly prohibited, this is emphasized in UN Security Council resolution 242 concerning the illegality of territorial control by war. The use of violence is only allowed in terms of self-defense, or based on the mandate of the UN Security Council for humanitarian purposes (humanitarian intervention). Apart from the above, in both classical international law and customary international law, the use of force and subjugation has not yet reached the stage of being prohibited.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {293--304} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.606},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/606}
}
Ambarwati, Denny Ramdhany, and Rina Rusman. Hukum Humanier Internasional Dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Arafat, Yasir. Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 Dan Perubahannya. Jakarta: Pertama Press, 2010.
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2017.
Eldar, Akiva. “Israeli, Syirian Repsentatives Reach Secret Understanding.” haaretz.com, 2007. https://www.haaretz.com/1.4950641.
Fox News. “Netanyahu: Security Must Come First in Mideast Peace Talks.” foxnews.com, 2011. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/netanyahu-security-must-come-first-in-mideast-peace-talks.
Jessup, Philip C. Di Balik Merdekanya Israel Dan Negara-Negara Lainnya Pasca- Perang Dunia II. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta Center for Information Analysis, 2007.
Jumena, Mas Nana, and Efriyanto. “Pengakuan (Recognition) Amerika Serikat Pada Wilayah Golan Suriah Sebagai Wilayah Israel; (Tinjauan Dalam Hukum Internasional).” Nurani Hukum 2, no. 2 (2019): 70–79. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v2i2.8841.
Kienle, Eberhard. Contemporary Syria: Liberalization between Cold War and Cold Peace. London: British Academic Press, 1994.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.
Masnun, Putri Yohani. “3 Akibat Konflik Palestina Dan Israel Yang Meresahkan Dunia.” Hukamnas.com, 2017. https://hukamnas.com/akibat-konflik-palestina-dan-israel.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2017.
Ravid, Barak. “Netanyahu: Israel Will Never Withdraw From Golan.” haaretz.com, 2009. https://www.haaretz.com/1.5050131.
Schachter, Oscar. Sovereign Right and International Bussines, International Law and Practice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoft Publisher, 1991.
Wahyono. “6 Negara Tertua Di Dunia Yang Tetap Eksis Hingga Sekarang.” sindonews.com, 2020. https://international.sindonews.com/read/201946/45/6-negara-tertua-di-dunia-yang-tetap-eksis-hingga-sekarang-1603170627.
Wirawan, Miranti Kencana. “AS Kini Tolak Klaim Israel Atas Dataran Tinggi Golan, Ini Pernyataan PM Netanyahu.” KOMPAS.com, 2021. https://www.kompas.com/global/read/2021/02/10/190051570/as-kini-tolak-klaim-israel-atas-dataran-tinggi-golan-ini-pernyataan-pm.
Yossef, Amr. “The Six-Day War Revisited,” 2006.
: 2449 times
Download : 4878 times
DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.606
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Fahira Ode Damura, Arman Anwar, Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
