Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

Agus Sujiono; Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae; Ronny Soplantila

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613

Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

Agus Sujiono⁽¹⁾, Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae⁽²⁾, Ronny Soplantila⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The weak implementation of the PTUN decision is due to the absence of an executorial institution and the force to force the implementation of the PTUN decision so that the implementation of the PTUN decision depends on the awareness and initiative of the State Administration Official. Execution of court decisions is the implementation of court decisions by or with the assistance of external parties from the parties. Matters related to execution are the cancellation of the Decree followed by rehabilitation, administrative sanctions and execution of a decision to pay a sum of money.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze and discuss the forms of decisions of the State Administrative Court and the legal consequences if the State Administrative Officials do not carry out the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court. The writing method used is normative legal research using a statutory approach and the concept of legal analysis.

Methods of the Research: This method using normative legal research methods, namely research conducted by studying literature or literature study related to the problems at hand.

Results of the Research: The research results show that officials who do not carry out the obligations ordered in the decision of the State Administrative Court which have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) are subject to moderate administrative sanctions which include: a) forced payment and / or compensation; b) temporary dismissal by obtaining office rights; or c) temporary dismissal without obtaining office rights. Article 11 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials determines that the imposition of minor administrative sanctions is carried out directly by superior officials, while the imposition of moderate and / or severe administrative sanctions is carried out through an internal inspection mechanism. Regarding officials who are authorized to impose administrative sanctions regulated in Article 12 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials.

Keywords

Legal Consequences; State Administration Officials; Court Decisions.

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613

Published

2021-10-05

How To Cite

APA: Sujiono, A., Pattipawae, D.R., & Soplantila, R. (2021). Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(4), 364–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613.

IEEE: A. Sujiono, D.R. Pattipawae, and R. Soplantila, "Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 364–375, Oct. 2021. Accessed on: May. 9, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613

Harvard: Sujiono, A., Pattipawae, D.R., and Soplantila, R., (2021). "Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(4), pp. 364–375. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613 (Accessed on: 9 May 2025)

Chicago: Sujiono, Agus, Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae, and Ronny Soplantila. "Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (October 5, 2021): 364–375. Accessed May 9, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613

Vancouver: Sujiono A, Pattipawae DR, Soplantila R. Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Oct 5 [cited 2025 May 9];1(4):364–375. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613

MLA 8th: Sujiono, Agus, Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae, and Ronny Soplantila. "Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 4, 5 Oct. 2021, pp. 364–375, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613. Accessed 9 May. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI613,
		author = {Agus Sujiono and Dezonda Pattipawae and Ronny Soplantila},
		title = {Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {4},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Legal Consequences; State Administration Officials; Court Decisions.},
		abstract = {Introduction: The weak implementation of the PTUN decision is due to the absence of an executorial institution and the force to force the implementation of the PTUN decision so that the implementation of the PTUN decision depends on the awareness and initiative of the State Administration Official. Execution of court decisions is the implementation of court decisions by or with the assistance of external parties from the parties. Matters related to execution are the cancellation of the Decree followed by rehabilitation, administrative sanctions and execution of a decision to pay a sum of money.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze and discuss the forms of decisions of the State Administrative Court and the legal consequences if the State Administrative Officials do not carry out the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court. The writing method used is normative legal research using a statutory approach and the concept of legal analysis.Methods of the Research: This method using normative legal research methods, namely research conducted by studying literature or literature study related to the problems at hand.Results of the Research: The research results show that officials who do not carry out the obligations ordered in the decision of the State Administrative Court which have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) are subject to moderate administrative sanctions which include: a) forced payment and / or compensation; b) temporary dismissal by obtaining office rights; or c) temporary dismissal without obtaining office rights. Article 11 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials determines that the imposition of minor administrative sanctions is carried out directly by superior officials, while the imposition of moderate and / or severe administrative sanctions is carried out through an internal inspection mechanism. Regarding officials who are authorized to impose administrative sanctions regulated in Article 12 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {364--375}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/613}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Darwan. Strategi Menangani Perkara Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005. Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2019. Lotulung, Paulus Efendie. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2013. Muliyadi, Lilik. Tuntutan Uang Paksa Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Bandung: Alumni, 2001. Setiadi, Wicipto. Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004. Tumpa, Harifin A. Memahami Eksistensi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010. Wiryono, R. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007. Zulkarnaen, H, and Dwi Mayaningsih. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2018.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 4885 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 5137 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Agus Sujiono; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Ronny Soplantila; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Legal Consequences; State Administration Officials; Court Decisions.

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: The weak implementation of the PTUN decision is due to the absence of an executorial institution and the force to force the implementation of the PTUN decision so that the implementation of the PTUN decision depends on the awareness and initiative of the State Administration Official. Execution of court decisions is the implementation of court decisions by or with the assistance of external parties from the parties. Matters related to execution are the cancellation of the Decree followed by rehabilitation, administrative sanctions and execution of a decision to pay a sum of money.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze and discuss the forms of decisions of the State Administrative Court and the legal consequences if the State Administrative Officials do not carry out the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court. The writing method used is normative legal research using a statutory approach and the concept of legal analysis.Methods of the Research: This method using normative legal research methods, namely research conducted by studying literature or literature study related to the problems at hand.Results of the Research: The research results show that officials who do not carry out the obligations ordered in the decision of the State Administrative Court which have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) are subject to moderate administrative sanctions which include: a) forced payment and / or compensation; b) temporary dismissal by obtaining office rights; or c) temporary dismissal without obtaining office rights. Article 11 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials determines that the imposition of minor administrative sanctions is carried out directly by superior officials, while the imposition of moderate and / or severe administrative sanctions is carried out through an internal inspection mechanism. Regarding officials who are authorized to impose administrative sanctions regulated in Article 12 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2021-10-05

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/613

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 4 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 4, Juni 2021

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..