Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)

Faradillah Maulidyah Pelu; John Dirk Pasalbessy; Margie Gladies Sopacua

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)

Faradillah Maulidyah Pelu⁽¹⁾, John Dirk Pasalbessy⁽²⁾, Margie Gladies Sopacua⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Novum or new evidence or new circumstances is a condition for submitting a request for review. Review is a legal remedy that can be taken by the convict (the person who is sentenced) in a legal case against a court decision that has permanent legal force in the justice system in Indonesia.

Purposes of the Research: Reviewing and explaining the legal strength of the (Novum) evidence in the examination of cases of reviewing several crimes of murder.

Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative juridicial research type with a descriptive analitycal type of research. Engineering legal materials by conducting library research on legal materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are obtained from qualitative calcifications.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be rejected that the submission of a review by the convict/applicant for reconsideration, namely Imam Chambali, is an application that has met the elements of the provisions in Article 263 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 24 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Novum or new evidence or new circumstances as a basis for filing a petition for review to the Supreme Court.

Keywords

Novum; Reconsideration; Murder Criminal Act

How To Cite

APA: Pelu, F.M., Pasalbessy, J.D., & Sopacua, M.G. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP). TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(6), 590 – 595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642.

IEEE: F.M. Pelu, J.D. Pasalbessy, and M.G. Sopacua, "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 590 – 595, Oct. 2021. Accessed on: Apr. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

Harvard: Pelu, F.M., Pasalbessy, J.D., and Sopacua, M.G., (2021). "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(6), pp. 590 – 595. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642 (Accessed on: 17 April 2024)

Chicago: Pelu, Faradillah Maulidyah, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 6 (October 24, 2021): 590 – 595. Accessed April 17, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

Vancouver: Pelu FM, Pasalbessy JD, Sopacua MG. Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP). TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Oct 24 [cited 2024 Apr 17];1(6):590 – 595. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

MLA 8th: Pelu, Faradillah Maulidyah, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 6, 24 Oct. 2021, pp. 590 – 595, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642. Accessed 17 Apr. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI642,
		author = {Faradillah Pelu and John Pasalbessy and Margie Sopacua},
		title = {Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {6},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Novum; Reconsideration; Murder Criminal Act},
		abstract = {Introduction: Novum or new evidence or new circumstances is a condition for submitting a request for review. Review is a legal remedy that can be taken by the convict (the person who is sentenced) in a legal case against a court decision that has permanent legal force in the justice system in Indonesia. Purposes of the Research: Reviewing and explaining the legal strength of the (Novum) evidence in the examination of cases of reviewing several crimes of murder.Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative juridicial research type with a descriptive analitycal type of research. Engineering legal materials by conducting library research on legal materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are obtained from qualitative calcifications.Results of the Research: Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be rejected that the submission of a review by the convict/applicant for reconsideration, namely Imam Chambali, is an application that has met the elements of the provisions in Article 263 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 24 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Novum or new evidence or new circumstances as a basis for filing a petition for review to the Supreme Court.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {590--595}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/642}
		}

RefWorks: