Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)

Faradillah Maulidyah Pelu; John Dirk Pasalbessy; Margie Gladies Sopacua

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)

Faradillah Maulidyah Pelu⁽¹⁾, John Dirk Pasalbessy⁽²⁾, Margie Gladies Sopacua⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Novum or new evidence or new circumstances is a condition for submitting a request for review. Review is a legal remedy that can be taken by the convict (the person who is sentenced) in a legal case against a court decision that has permanent legal force in the justice system in Indonesia.

Purposes of the Research: Reviewing and explaining the legal strength of the (Novum) evidence in the examination of cases of reviewing several crimes of murder.

Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative juridicial research type with a descriptive analitycal type of research. Engineering legal materials by conducting library research on legal materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are obtained from qualitative calcifications.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be rejected that the submission of a review by the convict/applicant for reconsideration, namely Imam Chambali, is an application that has met the elements of the provisions in Article 263 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 24 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Novum or new evidence or new circumstances as a basis for filing a petition for review to the Supreme Court.

Keywords

Novum; Reconsideration; Murder Criminal Act

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

Published

2021-10-24

How To Cite

APA: Pelu, F.M., Pasalbessy, J.D., & Sopacua, M.G. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP). TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(6), 590 – 595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642.

IEEE: F.M. Pelu, J.D. Pasalbessy, and M.G. Sopacua, "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 590 – 595, Oct. 2021. Accessed on: May. 3, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

Harvard: Pelu, F.M., Pasalbessy, J.D., and Sopacua, M.G., (2021). "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(6), pp. 590 – 595. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642 (Accessed on: 3 May 2025)

Chicago: Pelu, Faradillah Maulidyah, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 6 (October 24, 2021): 590 – 595. Accessed May 3, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

Vancouver: Pelu FM, Pasalbessy JD, Sopacua MG. Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP). TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Oct 24 [cited 2025 May 3];1(6):590 – 595. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

MLA 8th: Pelu, Faradillah Maulidyah, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 6, 24 Oct. 2021, pp. 590 – 595, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642. Accessed 3 May. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI642,
		author = {Faradillah Pelu and John Pasalbessy and Margie Sopacua},
		title = {Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {6},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Novum; Reconsideration; Murder Criminal Act},
		abstract = {Introduction: Novum or new evidence or new circumstances is a condition for submitting a request for review. Review is a legal remedy that can be taken by the convict (the person who is sentenced) in a legal case against a court decision that has permanent legal force in the justice system in Indonesia. Purposes of the Research: Reviewing and explaining the legal strength of the (Novum) evidence in the examination of cases of reviewing several crimes of murder.Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative juridicial research type with a descriptive analitycal type of research. Engineering legal materials by conducting library research on legal materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are obtained from qualitative calcifications.Results of the Research: Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be rejected that the submission of a review by the convict/applicant for reconsideration, namely Imam Chambali, is an application that has met the elements of the provisions in Article 263 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 24 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Novum or new evidence or new circumstances as a basis for filing a petition for review to the Supreme Court.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {590--595}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/642}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Hatta, Moh. Beberapa Masalah Penegak Hukum Pidana Umum & Pidana Khusus. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.

Margono, H. Asas Keadilan Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim. Rawamangun: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2017.

Samosir, Djisman. Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2013.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI- Press, 2010.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 1363 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 932 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti (Novum) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 KUHP)

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Faradillah Maulidyah Pelu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	John Dirk Pasalbessy; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Margie Gladies Sopacua; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Novum; Reconsideration; Murder Criminal Act

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: Novum or new evidence or new circumstances is a condition for submitting a request for review. Review is a legal remedy that can be taken by the convict (the person who is sentenced) in a legal case against a court decision that has permanent legal force in the justice system in Indonesia. Purposes of the Research: Reviewing and explaining the legal strength of the (Novum) evidence in the examination of cases of reviewing several crimes of murder.Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative juridicial research type with a descriptive analitycal type of research. Engineering legal materials by conducting library research on legal materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are obtained from qualitative calcifications.Results of the Research: Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be rejected that the submission of a review by the convict/applicant for reconsideration, namely Imam Chambali, is an application that has met the elements of the provisions in Article 263 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 24 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Novum or new evidence or new circumstances as a basis for filing a petition for review to the Supreme Court.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2021-10-24

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/642

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 6 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 6, Agustus 2021

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..