Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja
), Saartje Sarah Alfons(2), Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The formation of good and correct regulations is based on the principle of the formation of statutory regulations. In the formation of the Job Creation Law, the procedure that was followed later became a polemic when this Law did not involve procedural community participation.
Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to identify and examine the legal consequences of the establishment of the Job Creation Act.
Methods of the Research: The method used in conducting a study of this problem is normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach.
Results of the Research: The legal consequence of the establishment of the Job Creation Act is the emergence of disinformation in the community regarding the contents of the Job Creation Act, so many parties have asked the Constitutional Court to conduct a judicial review or judicial review of the Job Creation Act. This is because the creation of the Copyright Act did not pay attention to the principles of openness and public participation in the process of its formation. Community Social Institutions (LSM) and the Confederation of Indonesian Trade Unions (KSPI) when asking for the draft of the Job Creation Bill, the government could not show that the people who were the target of the regulation should have easy access to the draft law. And also KSPI admitted that it was not involved in the formation of the Job Creation ActKeywords
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI645,
author = {Aprillia Saiya and Saartje Alfons and Heillen Tita},
title = {Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {6},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Establishment of Laws and Regulations; Job Creation Law; Society Participation},
abstract = {Introduction: The formation of good and correct regulations is based on the principle of the formation of statutory regulations. In the formation of the Job Creation Law, the procedure that was followed later became a polemic when this Law did not involve procedural community participation.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to identify and examine the legal consequences of the establishment of the Job Creation Act.Methods of the Research: The method used in conducting a study of this problem is normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach.Results of the Research: The legal consequence of the establishment of the Job Creation Act is the emergence of disinformation in the community regarding the contents of the Job Creation Act, so many parties have asked the Constitutional Court to conduct a judicial review or judicial review of the Job Creation Act. This is because the creation of the Copyright Act did not pay attention to the principles of openness and public participation in the process of its formation. Community Social Institutions (LSM) and the Confederation of Indonesian Trade Unions (KSPI) when asking for the draft of the Job Creation Bill, the government could not show that the people who were the target of the regulation should have easy access to the draft law. And also KSPI admitted that it was not involved in the formation of the Job Creation Act},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {618--626} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.645},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/645}
}
Ajukan Judicial Review UU Cipta Kerja ke MK, Buruh: Jangan Pernah Menganggap Main-main (http://money.kompas.com/read/2020/11/03/070200226/ajukan-judicial-review-uu-cipta-kerja-ke-mk-buruh-jangan-pernah-menganggap).
Buruh Tak Dilibatkan dalam Pembahasan RUU Cipta Kerja (https://www.ayosemarang.com/read/2020/08/25/62607/buruh-tak-dilibatkan-dalam-pembahasan-ruu-cipta-kerja).
Jati, Rahendro. "Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang Yang Responsif." Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 1, no. 3 (2012): 329-42. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.88.
https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.88
Kamarudin. "Tinjauan Yuridis Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang." Perspektif Hukum 15, no. 2 (2017): 165-84.
https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v15i2.35
Pakar Hukum: Pembentukan UU Cipta Kerja Merupakan Proses Legislasi Terburuk https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/17/11113141/pakar-hukum-pembentukan-uu-cipta-kerja-merupakan-proses-legislasi-terburuk).
Riyanto, Sigit, Maria S W Sumardjono, Eddy O S Hiariej, Sulistiowati, Ari Hernawan, Zainal Arifin Mochtar, Totok Dwi Diantoro, Mailinda Eka Yuniza, I Gusti Agung Made Wardana, and Nabiyla Risfa Izzati. Kertas Kebijakan: Catatan Kritis Dan Rekomendasi Terhadap RUU Cipta Kerja. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2020.
Saat LSM Satu Suara Tolak Undangan KSP Bahas Omnibus Law RUU Cilaka (https://tirto.id/saat-lsm-satu-suara-tolak-undangan-ksp-bahas-omnibus-law-ruu-cilaka-eDfP).
Susilowati, Eny. "Tingkat Keikutsertaan Masyarakat Dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang." MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2017): 46-58.
Tahapan Penyusunan UU Cipta Kerja, diakses dari https://maritim.go.id/tahapan-penyusunan-uu-cipta-kerja/.
Tita, Heillen M Y. "Kajian Yuridis Tentang Problematika Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/UUP-IX/2011." SASI 20, no. 1 (2014): 56-63.
Zein, Yahya Ahmad, Ristina Yudhanti, and Aditia Syaprillah. Legislative Drafting Perancangan Undang-Undang. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2016.
: 9151 times
Download : 7215 times
DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.645
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Aprillia Jultje Saiya, Saartje Sarah Alfons, Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
