Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan

Bella Verawaty Arnas(1email), Remon Supusepa(2), Margie Gladies Sopacua(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Indonesia is currently being hit by the Corona Virus or Covid-19. Various efforts have been made in handling Covid-19.

Purposes of the Research: To examine and discuss the accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine and To examine and discuss whether the judge's considerations in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse have fulfilled the purpose of punishment.

Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research type of descriptive analytical research, the sources of legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are inventory procedures and identification of laws and regulations, as well as classification and systematic legal materials according to research problems, while analysis of legal materials is both destructive and qualitative methods.

Results of the Research: The results obtained from this study are: Accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine is criminalized and/or fined, and the judge's consideration in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse has fulfilled the purpose of punishment because it has fulfilled juridical considerations as well as non-juridical considerations. Then, in terms of the accountability of the perpetrators, more attention is paid to the teaching of participation because the confiscation of the bodies of Covid-19 is not only carried out by a few people with the participation and the judge's consideration in imposing a crime in the future will have a more deterrent effect on the perpetrators of criminal acts so that this event or incident does not happen again

Keywords


Judge's Legal Considerations; Covid-19 Body Seizure; Purpose of Sentencing


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661

Published


2021-10-30

How To Cite


APA: Arnas, B.V., Supusepa, R., & Sopacua, M.G. (2021). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(7), 654 – 671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661.
IEEE: B.V. Arnas, R. Supusepa, and M.G. Sopacua, "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 654 – 671, Oct. 2021. Accessed on: Jun. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661
Harvard: Arnas, B.V., Supusepa, R., and Sopacua, M.G., (2021). "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(7), pp. 654 – 671. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661 (Accessed on: 15 June 2024)
Chicago: Arnas, Bella Verawaty, Remon Supusepa, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 7 (October 30, 2021): 654 – 671. Accessed June 15, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661
Vancouver: Arnas BV, Supusepa R, Sopacua MG. Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Oct 30 [cited 2024 Jun 15];1(7):654 – 671. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661
MLA 8th: Arnas, Bella Verawaty, Remon Supusepa, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 7, 30 Oct. 2021, pp. 654 – 671, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661. Accessed 15 Jun. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI661,
		author = {Bella Arnas and Remon Supusepa and Margie Sopacua},
		title = {Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {7},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Judge's Legal Considerations; Covid-19 Body Seizure; Purpose of Sentencing},
		abstract = {Introduction: Indonesia is currently being hit by the Corona Virus or Covid-19. Various efforts have been made in handling Covid-19.Purposes of the Research: To examine and discuss the accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine and To examine and discuss whether the judge's considerations in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse have fulfilled the purpose of punishment.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research type of descriptive analytical research, the sources of legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are inventory procedures and identification of laws and regulations, as well as classification and systematic legal materials according to research problems, while analysis of legal materials is both destructive and qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results obtained from this study are: Accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine is criminalized and/or fined, and the judge's consideration in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse has fulfilled the purpose of punishment because it has fulfilled juridical considerations as well as non-juridical considerations. Then, in terms of the accountability of the perpetrators, more attention is paid to the teaching of participation because the confiscation of the bodies of Covid-19 is not only carried out by a few people with the participation and the judge's consideration in imposing a crime in the future will have a more deterrent effect on the perpetrators of criminal acts so that this event or incident does not happen again},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {654--671}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/661}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Arbijoto. Kebebasan Hakim (Analitis Kritis Terhadap Peran Hakim Dalam Menjalankan Kekuasaan Kehakiman). Jakarta, 2010.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan & Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 2008.

Friedman, L M. The Legal System; A Social Science Prespective. New York: New York Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.

Hatta, Moh. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu (Dalam Konsepsi Dan Implementasi). Yogyakarta: Galang Press, 2008.

https://www.alinea.id/nasional/pakai-uu-no-6-tahun-2018

Kurde, Nuktoh Arfawie. Telaah Kritis Teori Negara Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.

Mappiasse, Syarif. Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2015.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.

Muladi, and Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2004.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Mustofa, Wildan Suyuthi. Kode Etik Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2013.

Nail, Muhammad Hoiru, and Jayus. Pergeseran Fungsi Yudikatif Dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing, 2019.

Rasjidi, Lili, and Ira Thania Rasjidi. Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Dan Teori Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Suyanto, H. Pengantar Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.

Terina, Tian, and Fatur Rachman. Konsep Pemidanaan Dari Kacamata Hukum Penitensier. Malang: Ismaya Publishing, 2015.

Waluyo, Bambang. Pidana Dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Yazid, Fadhil. "Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pengambilan Paksa Jenasah Pasien Covid-19 Di Indonesia." JURNAL BELO 6, no. 1 (2021): 60-72. https://doi.org/10.30598/BELOVOL6ISSUE1PAGE60-72.

https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol6issue1page60-72

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1242 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 1962 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Bella Verawaty Arnas, Remon Supusepa, Margie Gladies Sopacua

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.