Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan
), Remon Supusepa(2), Margie Gladies Sopacua(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Indonesia is currently being hit by the Corona Virus or Covid-19. Various efforts have been made in handling Covid-19.
Purposes of the Research: To examine and discuss the accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine and To examine and discuss whether the judge's considerations in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse have fulfilled the purpose of punishment.
Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research type of descriptive analytical research, the sources of legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are inventory procedures and identification of laws and regulations, as well as classification and systematic legal materials according to research problems, while analysis of legal materials is both destructive and qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The results obtained from this study are: Accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine is criminalized and/or fined, and the judge's consideration in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse has fulfilled the purpose of punishment because it has fulfilled juridical considerations as well as non-juridical considerations. Then, in terms of the accountability of the perpetrators, more attention is paid to the teaching of participation because the confiscation of the bodies of Covid-19 is not only carried out by a few people with the participation and the judge's consideration in imposing a crime in the future will have a more deterrent effect on the perpetrators of criminal acts so that this event or incident does not happen againKeywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661
Published
2021-10-30
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI661,
author = {Bella Arnas and Remon Supusepa and Margie Sopacua},
title = {Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {7},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Judge's Legal Considerations; Covid-19 Body Seizure; Purpose of Sentencing},
abstract = {Introduction: Indonesia is currently being hit by the Corona Virus or Covid-19. Various efforts have been made in handling Covid-19.Purposes of the Research: To examine and discuss the accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine and To examine and discuss whether the judge's considerations in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse have fulfilled the purpose of punishment.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research type of descriptive analytical research, the sources of legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are inventory procedures and identification of laws and regulations, as well as classification and systematic legal materials according to research problems, while analysis of legal materials is both destructive and qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results obtained from this study are: Accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine is criminalized and/or fined, and the judge's consideration in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse has fulfilled the purpose of punishment because it has fulfilled juridical considerations as well as non-juridical considerations. Then, in terms of the accountability of the perpetrators, more attention is paid to the teaching of participation because the confiscation of the bodies of Covid-19 is not only carried out by a few people with the participation and the judge's consideration in imposing a crime in the future will have a more deterrent effect on the perpetrators of criminal acts so that this event or incident does not happen again},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {654--671} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/661}
}
Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Arbijoto. Kebebasan Hakim (Analitis Kritis Terhadap Peran Hakim Dalam Menjalankan Kekuasaan Kehakiman). Jakarta, 2010.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan & Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 2008.
Friedman, L M. The Legal System; A Social Science Prespective. New York: New York Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.
Hatta, Moh. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu (Dalam Konsepsi Dan Implementasi). Yogyakarta: Galang Press, 2008.
https://www.alinea.id/nasional/pakai-uu-no-6-tahun-2018
Kurde, Nuktoh Arfawie. Telaah Kritis Teori Negara Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.
Mappiasse, Syarif. Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2015.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Muladi, and Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2004.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
Mustofa, Wildan Suyuthi. Kode Etik Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2013.
Nail, Muhammad Hoiru, and Jayus. Pergeseran Fungsi Yudikatif Dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing, 2019.
Rasjidi, Lili, and Ira Thania Rasjidi. Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Dan Teori Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Suyanto, H. Pengantar Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.
Terina, Tian, and Fatur Rachman. Konsep Pemidanaan Dari Kacamata Hukum Penitensier. Malang: Ismaya Publishing, 2015.
Waluyo, Bambang. Pidana Dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Yazid, Fadhil. "Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pengambilan Paksa Jenasah Pasien Covid-19 Di Indonesia." JURNAL BELO 6, no. 1 (2021): 60-72. https://doi.org/10.30598/BELOVOL6ISSUE1PAGE60-72.
https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol6issue1page60-72
: 1406 times
Download : 2058 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 306/Pid.B/2020/PN.Ambon Terhadap Perampasan Jenazah Covid-19 Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Bella Verawaty Arnas; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Remon Supusepa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Margie Gladies Sopacua; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Judge's Legal Considerations; Covid-19 Body Seizure; Purpose of Sentencing |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Indonesia is currently being hit by the Corona Virus or Covid-19. Various efforts have been made in handling Covid-19.Purposes of the Research: To examine and discuss the accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine and To examine and discuss whether the judge's considerations in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse have fulfilled the purpose of punishment.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research type of descriptive analytical research, the sources of legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques are inventory procedures and identification of laws and regulations, as well as classification and systematic legal materials according to research problems, while analysis of legal materials is both destructive and qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results obtained from this study are: Accountability of the perpetrators according to Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine is criminalized and/or fined, and the judge's consideration in the decision of the perpetrators of the seizure of the Covid-19 corpse has fulfilled the purpose of punishment because it has fulfilled juridical considerations as well as non-juridical considerations. Then, in terms of the accountability of the perpetrators, more attention is paid to the teaching of participation because the confiscation of the bodies of Covid-19 is not only carried out by a few people with the participation and the judge's consideration in imposing a crime in the future will have a more deterrent effect on the perpetrators of criminal acts so that this event or incident does not happen again |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2021-10-30 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/661 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.661 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 7 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 7, September 2021 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Bella Verawaty Arnas, Remon Supusepa, Margie Gladies Sopacua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
