Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia

Gerald Gary Moniharapon(1email), Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu(2), Elias Z Leasa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Possession of firearms is necessary for professional Polri members because the goal is to support their duties.

Purposes of the Research: Explaining What is the legal reason for the judge's ruling on the District Court and the High Court's ruling against the perpetrator who intentionally misused a firearm.

 

Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, namely the approach to legal products and the case approach.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that related to the theory of intentionality (Dolus), the defendant Elianth Ronalto Latuheru's actions have fulfilled the intentional element as a possibility (opzet bij mogelijkheids-bewustzijn). or judge's opinion. Thus stating Ronal Elianth Latuheru, committed a crime of murder with a prison sentence of 8 (eight) years and a Recommendation for Disrespectful Dismissal (PTDH) as a member of the Police.

Keywords


Sanctions; Firearms; Police


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663

Published


2021-10-30

How To Cite


APA: Moniharapon, G.G., Titahelu, J.A., & Leasa, E.Z. (2021). Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(7), 679 – 690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663.
IEEE: G.G. Moniharapon, J.A. Titahelu, and E.Z. Leasa, "Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 679 – 690, Oct. 2021. Accessed on: May. 7, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663
Harvard: Moniharapon, G.G., Titahelu, J.A., and Leasa, E.Z., (2021). "Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(7), pp. 679 – 690. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663 (Accessed on: 7 May 2025)
Chicago: Moniharapon, Gerald Gary, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Elias Z Leasa. "Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 7 (October 30, 2021): 679 – 690. Accessed May 7, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663
Vancouver: Moniharapon GG, Titahelu JA, Leasa EZ. Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Oct 30 [cited 2025 May 7];1(7):679 – 690. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663
MLA 8th: Moniharapon, Gerald Gary, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Elias Z Leasa. "Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 7, 30 Oct. 2021, pp. 679 – 690, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663. Accessed 7 May. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI663,
		author = {Gerald Moniharapon and Juanrico Titahelu and Elias Leasa},
		title = {Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {7},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Sanctions; Firearms; Police},
		abstract = {Introduction: Possession of firearms is necessary for professional Polri members because the goal is to support their duties.Purposes of the Research: Explaining What is the legal reason for the judge's ruling on the District Court and the High Court's ruling against the perpetrator who intentionally misused a firearm. Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, namely the approach to legal products and the case approach.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that related to the theory of intentionality (Dolus), the defendant Elianth Ronalto Latuheru's actions have fulfilled the intentional element as a possibility (opzet bij mogelijkheids-bewustzijn). or judge's opinion. Thus stating Ronal Elianth Latuheru, committed a crime of murder with a prison sentence of 8 (eight) years and a Recommendation for Disrespectful Dismissal (PTDH) as a member of the Police.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {679--690}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/663}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Arto, H A Mukti. Praktik Perkara Perdata Pada Pengdilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1996.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia: Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik, Teknik Membuat Dan Permasalahnya. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana. "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi." SASI 25, no. 1 (2019): 92-106. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151.

https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151

Poernomo, Bambang. Pokok-Pokok Tata Acara Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Jakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.

Sadjijono, M. Khoidin. Mengenal Figur Polisi Kita. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo, 2007.

Sudarto. Hukum Pidana Dan Perkembangan Masyarakat Kajian Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1986.

Sudarto. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.

Titahelu, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs. "Pelaksanaan Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Terorisme." JURNAL BELO 4, no. 2 (2019): 145-57. https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol6issue2page208-220.

https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol6issue2page208-220

Ubwarin, Erwin. "Disparitas Putusan Peradilan Negeri Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Illegal Mining Batu Cinnabar." Bacarita Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2020): 38-53.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 757 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 2303 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Sanksi Pidana Perbuatan Sengaja Menyalahgunakan Senjata Api Oleh Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Gerald Gary Moniharapon; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Elias Z Leasa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Sanctions; Firearms; Police
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: Possession of firearms is necessary for professional Polri members because the goal is to support their duties.Purposes of the Research: Explaining What is the legal reason for the judge's ruling on the District Court and the High Court's ruling against the perpetrator who intentionally misused a firearm. Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical. The problem approach used is the statutory approach, namely the approach to legal products and the case approach.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that related to the theory of intentionality (Dolus), the defendant Elianth Ronalto Latuheru's actions have fulfilled the intentional element as a possibility (opzet bij mogelijkheids-bewustzijn). or judge's opinion. Thus stating Ronal Elianth Latuheru, committed a crime of murder with a prison sentence of 8 (eight) years and a Recommendation for Disrespectful Dismissal (PTDH) as a member of the Police.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2021-10-30
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/663
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.663
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 7 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 7, September 2021
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Gerald Gary Moniharapon, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Elias Z Leasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.