Penyelesaian Sengketa India-China melalui Mahkamah Internasional
), Efie Baadila(2), Josina Agusthina Yvonne Wattimena(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Aksai Chin is a region located in the border between India and China territories. This particular region has been in dispute for two countries since the Sino-Indian War in 1962. India holds on a demarcation line; passed down by England colony; a line called McMahon Line. Meanwhile China holds on different line called Line of Actual Control (LAC). The two countries do not share same perspective on demarcation line until these days. Plenty of agreements and treaties were made but did not produce expected result for both countries. The conflict occurred once again with the latest incident happened in Aksai Chin border when the border patrols of both countries were attacking each other.
Purposes of the Research: This event triggered some questions regarding how to put an end to this international dispute. The aims of this research are to provide a resolution to end the long dispute between India and China, to find out the middle ground or the better solution.
Methods of the Research: Type of research used is juridical normative, that is concept of law that is textual (law in books) or concept of law as a norm as guidance to how society behave in proper manner, by using case approach, statue approach and conceptual approach.
Results of the Research: In this research it was concluded that in international law there has been a regulation on how to set the boundaries of a country. The basis for determining borders, namely unwritten provisions and provisions. In recent developments, state boundaries are more determined by sources and processes of international law, such as self-determination, the principle of uti possidetis juris, effective occupation, state succession and national boundary agreements. The most potential mechanism for this case is through the International Court of Justice, first it is because the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is much more practical because it has permanent judges who are recognized. Second, with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) if a party in the case does not fulfill the obligations imposed by the ICJ decision, the other party can directly call the attention of the World Security Council if necessary to request a recommendation or determine the actions taken to make the decision possible.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i8.796
Published
2022-03-19
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI796,
author = {Andy Fallen and Efie Baadila and Josina Wattimena},
title = {Penyelesaian Sengketa India-China melalui Mahkamah Internasional},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {8},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Settlement Mechanism; Border Dispute; Border Law},
abstract = {Introduction: Aksai Chin is a region located in the border between India and China territories. This particular region has been in dispute for two countries since the Sino-Indian War in 1962. India holds on a demarcation line; passed down by England colony; a line called McMahon Line. Meanwhile China holds on different line called Line of Actual Control (LAC). The two countries do not share same perspective on demarcation line until these days. Plenty of agreements and treaties were made but did not produce expected result for both countries. The conflict occurred once again with the latest incident happened in Aksai Chin border when the border patrols of both countries were attacking each other.Purposes of the Research: This event triggered some questions regarding how to put an end to this international dispute. The aims of this research are to provide a resolution to end the long dispute between India and China, to find out the middle ground or the better solution. Methods of the Research: Type of research used is juridical normative, that is concept of law that is textual (law in books) or concept of law as a norm as guidance to how society behave in proper manner, by using case approach, statue approach and conceptual approach.Results of the Research: In this research it was concluded that in international law there has been a regulation on how to set the boundaries of a country. The basis for determining borders, namely unwritten provisions and provisions. In recent developments, state boundaries are more determined by sources and processes of international law, such as self-determination, the principle of uti possidetis juris, effective occupation, state succession and national boundary agreements. The most potential mechanism for this case is through the International Court of Justice, first it is because the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is much more practical because it has permanent judges who are recognized. Second, with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) if a party in the case does not fulfill the obligations imposed by the ICJ decision, the other party can directly call the attention of the World Security Council if necessary to request a recommendation or determine the actions taken to make the decision possible.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {739--749} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i8.796},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/796}
}
Adolf, Huala. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Arifin, Saru. Hukum Perbatasan Darat Antarnegara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Asrudin, and Mirza Jaka Suryana. Refleksi Teori Hubungan Internasional (Dari Tradisional Ke Kontemporer). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2009.
Jamil, Nury Khoiril, and Rumawi. "Implikasi Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Keadaan Memaksa (Force Majeure) Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia." Jurnal Kertha Semaya 8, no. 7 (2020): 1044-54.
Pranoto, Bayu Kurniahadi. "Analisa Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbatasan Tiongkok-India Di Wilayah Himalaya Pasca Perjanjian 2005 Hingga Docklam Standoff 2017." Universitas Islam Ondonesia, 2018.
Singh, Zorawar Daulet. "After the Hiatus: India-China Border Diplomacy Since the 1970s." China Report 47, no. 2 (2011): 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/000944551104700203.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000944551104700203
Suwardi, Sri Setianingsih. Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: UI Press, 2006.
Wirayudha, Randy. "India Dan China Dalam Kemelut Perbatasan." historia.id, 2020. https://historia.id/militer/articles/india-dan-china-dalam-kemelut-perbatasan-vqmJ8/page/1.
: 5408 times
Download : 4317 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Penyelesaian Sengketa India-China melalui Mahkamah Internasional |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Andy Christopher Fallen; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Efie Baadila; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Josina Agusthina Yvonne Wattimena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Settlement Mechanism; Border Dispute; Border Law |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Aksai Chin is a region located in the border between India and China territories. This particular region has been in dispute for two countries since the Sino-Indian War in 1962. India holds on a demarcation line; passed down by England colony; a line called McMahon Line. Meanwhile China holds on different line called Line of Actual Control (LAC). The two countries do not share same perspective on demarcation line until these days. Plenty of agreements and treaties were made but did not produce expected result for both countries. The conflict occurred once again with the latest incident happened in Aksai Chin border when the border patrols of both countries were attacking each other.Purposes of the Research: This event triggered some questions regarding how to put an end to this international dispute. The aims of this research are to provide a resolution to end the long dispute between India and China, to find out the middle ground or the better solution. Methods of the Research: Type of research used is juridical normative, that is concept of law that is textual (law in books) or concept of law as a norm as guidance to how society behave in proper manner, by using case approach, statue approach and conceptual approach.Results of the Research: In this research it was concluded that in international law there has been a regulation on how to set the boundaries of a country. The basis for determining borders, namely unwritten provisions and provisions. In recent developments, state boundaries are more determined by sources and processes of international law, such as self-determination, the principle of uti possidetis juris, effective occupation, state succession and national boundary agreements. The most potential mechanism for this case is through the International Court of Justice, first it is because the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is much more practical because it has permanent judges who are recognized. Second, with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) if a party in the case does not fulfill the obligations imposed by the ICJ decision, the other party can directly call the attention of the World Security Council if necessary to request a recommendation or determine the actions taken to make the decision possible. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2022-03-19 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/796 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v1i8.796 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 8 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 8, Oktober 2021 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Andy Christopher Fallen, Efie Baadila, Josina Agusthina Yvonne Wattimena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
