Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna

Daniel Nazareth Soplera(1email), Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena(2)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: This study discusses the conflict in the use of fishery resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea.

Purposes of the Research: To show the provisions of the international legal area regarding the boundaries of the exclusive economic zone in the Natuna islands belonging to Indonesia which china claims as its own.

Methods of the Research: This research uses the notmative legal research method which is carried out by examining legal materials related to the problem being studied.

Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the conflict in the use of fisheries resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea which is claimed by China based on the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground is an unfounded reason. Because, in 1982 UNCLOS did not recognize the nine-dash line and the traditional fishing ground. Thas’s why Indonesia does a persistent objection through a diplomatic note, if Indonesia is considered to have complied with the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground rules declared by china.

Keywords


Conflict; Utilization; Fishery Resources


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807

Published


2021-11-30

How To Cite


APA: Soplera, D.N., & Wattimena, J.A. (2021). Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(9), 862 – 870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807.
IEEE: D.N. Soplera, and J.A. Wattimena, "Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 862 – 870, Nov. 2021. Accessed on: Apr. 28, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807
Harvard: Soplera, D.N., and Wattimena, J.A., (2021). "Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(9), pp. 862 – 870. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807 (Accessed on: 28 April 2025)
Chicago: Soplera, Daniel Nazareth, and Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena. "Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 9 (November 30, 2021): 862 – 870. Accessed April 28, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807
Vancouver: Soplera DN, Wattimena JA. Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Nov 30 [cited 2025 Apr 28];1(9):862 – 870. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807
MLA 8th: Soplera, Daniel Nazareth, and Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena. "Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 9, 30 Nov. 2021, pp. 862 – 870, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807. Accessed 28 Apr. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI807,
		author = {Daniel Soplera and Josina Wattimena},
		title = {Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {9},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Conflict; Utilization; Fishery Resources},
		abstract = {Introduction: This study discusses the conflict in the use of fishery resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea.Purposes of the Research: To show the provisions of the international legal area regarding the boundaries of the exclusive economic zone in the Natuna islands belonging to Indonesia which china claims as its own.Methods of the Research: This research uses the notmative legal research method which is carried out by examining legal materials related to the problem being studied.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the conflict in the use of fisheries resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea which is claimed by China based on the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground is an unfounded reason. Because, in 1982 UNCLOS did not recognize the nine-dash line and the traditional fishing ground. Thas’s why Indonesia does a persistent objection through a diplomatic note, if Indonesia is considered to have complied with the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground rules declared by china.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {862--870}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/807}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Gischa, Serafica. "Sejarah Konflik Natuna Dan Upaya Indonesia." Kompas.com, 2020. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/01/04/180000169/sejarah-konflik-natuna-dan-upaya-indonesia?page=all.

Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid, La Ode Angga, and Sabri Fataruba. "Hawear As Customary Law In Protecting And Conserving Marine Resources In Southeast Maluku Regency." Technium Social Sciences Journal 25 (2021): 146-55. https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4874.

Rafie, Barratut Taqiyyah. "Cerita Panjang Konflik China-Indonesia Di Laut Natuna." kontan.co.id, 2020. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/cerita-panjang-konflik-china-indonesia-di-laut-natuna?page=all.

Roy, S. L. Diplomasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1995.

Saat, Sudirman. Hak Pemeliharaan Dan Penangkan Ikan, Eksisten Dan Prospek Pengaturannya Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LKIS Pelangi Aksara, 2009.

Tempo.co. "Mantan Menlu Marty Natalegawa: Asia Timur Perlu Keseimbangan." Tempo.co, 2015. https://dunia.tempo.co/read/717680/mantan-menlu-marty-natalegawa-asia-timur-perlu-keseimbangan/full&view=ok.

Thomas, Vincent Fabian. "Kekayaan Laut Natuna & Alasan Kenapa Cina Selalu Mengklaimnya." tirto.id, 2020. https://tirto.id/kekayaan-laut-natuna-alasan-kenapa-cina-selalu-mengklaimnya-erpk.

Wattimena, Josina Augusthina Yvonne. "Urgency Of Boundary Maritime Management, Strategies Prevent Conflicts." Indonesian Journal of International Law 15, no. 1 (2017): 29-46. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol15.1.740.
https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol15.1.740

Welianto, Ari. "Perwakilan Diplomatik Indonesia: Fungsi Dan Tugasnya." Kompas.com, 2020. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/03/09/090000369/perwakilan-diplomatik-indonesia-fungsi-dan-tugasnya?page=all.

Wikipedia. "Diplomasi." wikipedia.org. Accessed April 9, 2020. https://id.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomasi.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1132 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 1659 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Daniel Nazareth Soplera; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Conflict; Utilization; Fishery Resources
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: This study discusses the conflict in the use of fishery resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea.Purposes of the Research: To show the provisions of the international legal area regarding the boundaries of the exclusive economic zone in the Natuna islands belonging to Indonesia which china claims as its own.Methods of the Research: This research uses the notmative legal research method which is carried out by examining legal materials related to the problem being studied.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the conflict in the use of fisheries resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea which is claimed by China based on the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground is an unfounded reason. Because, in 1982 UNCLOS did not recognize the nine-dash line and the traditional fishing ground. Thas’s why Indonesia does a persistent objection through a diplomatic note, if Indonesia is considered to have complied with the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground rules declared by china.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2021-11-30
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/807
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 9 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 9, November 2021
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Daniel Nazareth Soplera, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.