Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

Abstract
Introduction: This study discusses the conflict in the use of fishery resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea.
Purposes of the Research: To show the provisions of the international legal area regarding the boundaries of the exclusive economic zone in the Natuna islands belonging to Indonesia which china claims as its own.
Methods of the Research: This research uses the notmative legal research method which is carried out by examining legal materials related to the problem being studied.
Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the conflict in the use of fisheries resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea which is claimed by China based on the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground is an unfounded reason. Because, in 1982 UNCLOS did not recognize the nine-dash line and the traditional fishing ground. Thas’s why Indonesia does a persistent objection through a diplomatic note, if Indonesia is considered to have complied with the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground rules declared by china.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807
Published
2021-11-30
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI807, author = {Daniel Soplera and Josina Wattimena}, title = {Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna}, journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum}, volume = {1}, number = {9}, year = {2021}, keywords = {Conflict; Utilization; Fishery Resources}, abstract = {Introduction: This study discusses the conflict in the use of fishery resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea.Purposes of the Research: To show the provisions of the international legal area regarding the boundaries of the exclusive economic zone in the Natuna islands belonging to Indonesia which china claims as its own.Methods of the Research: This research uses the notmative legal research method which is carried out by examining legal materials related to the problem being studied.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the conflict in the use of fisheries resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea which is claimed by China based on the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground is an unfounded reason. Because, in 1982 UNCLOS did not recognize the nine-dash line and the traditional fishing ground. Thas’s why Indonesia does a persistent objection through a diplomatic note, if Indonesia is considered to have complied with the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground rules declared by china.}, issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {862--870} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/807} }
Gischa, Serafica. "Sejarah Konflik Natuna Dan Upaya Indonesia." Kompas.com, 2020. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/01/04/180000169/sejarah-konflik-natuna-dan-upaya-indonesia?page=all.
Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid, La Ode Angga, and Sabri Fataruba. "Hawear As Customary Law In Protecting And Conserving Marine Resources In Southeast Maluku Regency." Technium Social Sciences Journal 25 (2021): 146-55. https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4874.
Rafie, Barratut Taqiyyah. "Cerita Panjang Konflik China-Indonesia Di Laut Natuna." kontan.co.id, 2020. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/cerita-panjang-konflik-china-indonesia-di-laut-natuna?page=all.
Roy, S. L. Diplomasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1995.
Saat, Sudirman. Hak Pemeliharaan Dan Penangkan Ikan, Eksisten Dan Prospek Pengaturannya Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LKIS Pelangi Aksara, 2009.
Tempo.co. "Mantan Menlu Marty Natalegawa: Asia Timur Perlu Keseimbangan." Tempo.co, 2015. https://dunia.tempo.co/read/717680/mantan-menlu-marty-natalegawa-asia-timur-perlu-keseimbangan/full&view=ok.
Thomas, Vincent Fabian. "Kekayaan Laut Natuna & Alasan Kenapa Cina Selalu Mengklaimnya." tirto.id, 2020. https://tirto.id/kekayaan-laut-natuna-alasan-kenapa-cina-selalu-mengklaimnya-erpk.
Wattimena, Josina Augusthina Yvonne. "Urgency Of Boundary Maritime Management, Strategies Prevent Conflicts." Indonesian Journal of International Law 15, no. 1 (2017): 29-46. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol15.1.740.
https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol15.1.740
Welianto, Ari. "Perwakilan Diplomatik Indonesia: Fungsi Dan Tugasnya." Kompas.com, 2020. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/03/09/090000369/perwakilan-diplomatik-indonesia-fungsi-dan-tugasnya?page=all.
Wikipedia. "Diplomasi." wikipedia.org. Accessed April 9, 2020. https://id.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomasi.
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Antara Indonesia Dan China Di Laut Natuna |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Daniel Nazareth Soplera; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Conflict; Utilization; Fishery Resources |
4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: This study discusses the conflict in the use of fishery resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea.Purposes of the Research: To show the provisions of the international legal area regarding the boundaries of the exclusive economic zone in the Natuna islands belonging to Indonesia which china claims as its own.Methods of the Research: This research uses the notmative legal research method which is carried out by examining legal materials related to the problem being studied.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the conflict in the use of fisheries resources between Indonesia and China in the Natuna sea which is claimed by China based on the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground is an unfounded reason. Because, in 1982 UNCLOS did not recognize the nine-dash line and the traditional fishing ground. Thas’s why Indonesia does a persistent objection through a diplomatic note, if Indonesia is considered to have complied with the nine-dash line and traditional fishing ground rules declared by china. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2021-11-30 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/807 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.807 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 9 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 9, November 2021 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Daniel Nazareth Soplera, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.