Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19

Revandio Hendruno Moenandar; Rory Jeff Akyuwen; Sarah Selfina Kuahaty

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861

Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19

Revandio Hendruno Moenandar⁽¹⁾, Rory Jeff Akyuwen⁽²⁾, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The case of Credit Agreement and Debt Recognition with a fiduciary guarantee that occurred between Roberth Gomies as a debtor and PT. Sinar Mas Multifinance (PT. SMMF) as a creditor with a guarantee of 1 (one) unit of Public Transport Vehicle. In this case, the payment made by Robert Gomies experienced a payment delay due to the corona virus outbreak 19. So the vehicle used as credit collateral in the fiduciary agreement was forcibly/unilaterally withdrawn without the knowledge and permission of the debtor.

Purposes of the Research: Knowing and Reviewing Forms of Protection for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period and Execution Mechanisms for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period.

Methods of the Research: The method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is through literature study and then analyzed through a perspective using qualitative methods.

Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the procedure for withdrawing the object of fiduciary security must refer to the Regulation of the National Police Chief Number 8 of 2011 which is carried out by the creditor or his proxies must submit a request for securing the execution of the withdrawal of the fiduciary object which is made in writing addressed to the local police chief by attaching the following conditions: the following conditions, a. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee deed, b. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee certificate, c. A warning letter to the debtor to fulfill his obligations. d. The identity of the executor of the execution, e. Executioner's assignment letter. In addition, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 has also provided legal certainty for fiduciary guarantee.

Keywords

Legal Protection; Fiduciary Guarantee; Covid 19 Pandemic

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861

Published

2021-12-24

How To Cite

APA: Moenandar, R.H., Akyuwen, R.J., & Kuahaty, S.S. (2021). Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(10), 1025 – 1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861.

IEEE: R.H. Moenandar, R.J. Akyuwen, and S.S. Kuahaty, "Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 1025 – 1036, Dec. 2021. Accessed on: Dec. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861

Harvard: Moenandar, R.H., Akyuwen, R.J., and Kuahaty, S.S., (2021). "Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(10), pp. 1025 – 1036. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861 (Accessed on: 22 December 2024)

Chicago: Moenandar, Revandio Hendruno, Rory Jeff Akyuwen, and Sarah Selfina Kuahaty. "Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 10 (December 24, 2021): 1025 – 1036. Accessed December 22, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861

Vancouver: Moenandar RH, Akyuwen RJ, Kuahaty SS. Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Dec 24 [cited 2024 Dec 22];1(10):1025 – 1036. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861

MLA 8th: Moenandar, Revandio Hendruno, Rory Jeff Akyuwen, and Sarah Selfina Kuahaty. "Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 10, 24 Dec. 2021, pp. 1025 – 1036, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI861,
		author = {Revandio Moenandar and Rory Akyuwen and Sarah Kuahaty},
		title = {Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {10},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Legal Protection; Fiduciary Guarantee; Covid 19 Pandemic},
		abstract = {Introduction: The case of Credit Agreement and Debt Recognition with a fiduciary guarantee that occurred between Roberth Gomies as a debtor and PT. Sinar Mas Multifinance (PT. SMMF) as a creditor with a guarantee of 1 (one) unit of Public Transport Vehicle. In this case, the payment made by Robert Gomies experienced a payment delay due to the corona virus outbreak 19. So the vehicle used as credit collateral in the fiduciary agreement was forcibly/unilaterally withdrawn without the knowledge and permission of the debtor.Purposes of the Research: Knowing and Reviewing Forms of Protection for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period and Execution Mechanisms for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period. Methods of the Research: The method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is through literature study and then analyzed through a perspective using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the procedure for withdrawing the object of fiduciary security must refer to the Regulation of the National Police Chief Number 8 of 2011 which is carried out by the creditor or his proxies must submit a request for securing the execution of the withdrawal of the fiduciary object which is made in writing addressed to the local police chief by attaching the following conditions: the following conditions, a. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee deed, b. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee certificate, c. A warning letter to the debtor to fulfill his obligations. d. The identity of the executor of the execution, e. Executioner's assignment letter. In addition, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 has also provided legal certainty for fiduciary guarantee.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1025--1036}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/861}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Arjaya, I Made, and Nyoman Putra Suhambara. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian.” Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 2 (2021): 140–51. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.

Budi, Setia. “Permohonan Eksekusi Kepada Pengadilan Negeri Berkaitan Dengan Perjanjian Fidusia Terhadap Jaminan Yang Digelapkan.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 3, no. 1 (2017): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v3i1.15.

Dewi, Retno Puspo, Nor Saptanti, and Hari Purwadi. “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Berdasar Undang Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusi.” Jurnal Repertorium 4, no. 1 (2017): 73–81.

Harahap, M Yahya. Ruang Lingkung Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1988.

Hetharie, Yosia. “Default in Sea Transportation Agreement.” Law Research Review Quarterly 6, no. 2 (2020): 181–84. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v6i2.37900.

Isradjuningtias, Agri Chairunisa. “Force Majeure (Overmacht) Dalam Hukum Kontrak (Perjanjian) Indonesia.” Veritas et Justitia 1, no. 1 (2015): 136–58.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. “Stimulus Perekonomian Nasional Sebagai Kebijakan Countercyclical Dampak Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease 2019.” ojk.go.id, 2020. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/Stimulus-Perekonomian-Nasional-Sebagai-Kebijakan-Countercyclical-Dampak-Penyebaran-Coronavirus-Disease-2019.aspx.

Ridwan HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.

Saliman, Abdul R. Esensi Hukum Bisnis Indonesia: Teori & Contoh Kasus. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2004.

Sari, Ferrika. “Pendapatan Industri Multifinance Capai Rp 107,78 Triliun Pada 2018.” kontan.co.id, 2019. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/pendapatan-industri-multifinance-capai-rp-10778-triliun-pada-2018.

Tjoanda, Merry. “Karakteristik Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia.” Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (2020): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.424.

Tjoanda, Merry, Yosia Hetharie, Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela, and Ronald Fadly Sopamena. “Covid-19 Sebagai Bentuk Overmacht Dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit.” SASI 27, no. 1 (2021): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.447.

Full Text: PDF