Urgensi Diratifikasinya Konvensi 1951 Tentang Pengungsi Perspektif Hukum Keimigrasian
), Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena(2), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Indonesia does not have any interest in relation to refugees because it has not become a party to the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol. Therefore, the Indonesian government also does not have the authority to grant refugee status. so that the arrangement of problems regarding refugees is determined by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN agency which deals with refugee matters in accordance with the mandate it received under the UNHCR Statute of 1950.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is the Urgency of Indonesia to ratify the Convention so that Indonesia has no difficulty dealing with refugees and there are clear and optimal rules regarding refugee issues.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is juridical normative, the type of research is descriptive analytical, the source of the legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary materials. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature study and then analyzed using qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the urgency of Indonesia to ratify the Convention so that Indonesia would not have difficulty dealing with refugees and that there were clear and optimal rules regarding refugee issues because so far the issue of refugees was not regulated in the Immigration Act but only regulates immigrants. However, it indirectly regulates refugees. Therefore, the rules applied to refugees in Indonesia to date are Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration, but do not contain specific handling and provisions (lex specialis). So that refugees who enter Indonesian territory are treated with the same mechanism as legal immigrants who are accommodated in the Migration Detention Center (RUDENIM) whose facilities are classified as inadequate, of course this can cause psychological pressure for refugees, especially since Indonesia has ratified the UDHR. The next thing is that they are deported and even repatriated, of course this violates the principles contained in the 1951 Convention, where the legal protection for refugees by the Indonesian government uses the principles contained in the 1951 Convention. So indirectly Indonesia has followed the provisions of the 1951 Convention. Therefore, it is not allowed if there are refugees who are returned to their countries of origin.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.865
Published
2022-01-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI865,
author = {Tirza Siahaya and Josina Augustina Wattimena and Johanis Peilouw},
title = {Urgensi Diratifikasinya Konvensi 1951 Tentang Pengungsi Perspektif Hukum Keimigrasian},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {11},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Ratification; Convention; Refugee; Immigration},
abstract = {Introduction: Indonesia does not have any interest in relation to refugees because it has not become a party to the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol. Therefore, the Indonesian government also does not have the authority to grant refugee status. so that the arrangement of problems regarding refugees is determined by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN agency which deals with refugee matters in accordance with the mandate it received under the UNHCR Statute of 1950.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is the Urgency of Indonesia to ratify the Convention so that Indonesia has no difficulty dealing with refugees and there are clear and optimal rules regarding refugee issues. Methods of the Research: The research method used is juridical normative, the type of research is descriptive analytical, the source of the legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary materials. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature study and then analyzed using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the urgency of Indonesia to ratify the Convention so that Indonesia would not have difficulty dealing with refugees and that there were clear and optimal rules regarding refugee issues because so far the issue of refugees was not regulated in the Immigration Act but only regulates immigrants. However, it indirectly regulates refugees. Therefore, the rules applied to refugees in Indonesia to date are Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration, but do not contain specific handling and provisions (lex specialis). So that refugees who enter Indonesian territory are treated with the same mechanism as legal immigrants who are accommodated in the Migration Detention Center (RUDENIM) whose facilities are classified as inadequate, of course this can cause psychological pressure for refugees, especially since Indonesia has ratified the UDHR. The next thing is that they are deported and even repatriated, of course this violates the principles contained in the 1951 Convention, where the legal protection for refugees by the Indonesian government uses the principles contained in the 1951 Convention. So indirectly Indonesia has followed the provisions of the 1951 Convention. Therefore, it is not allowed if there are refugees who are returned to their countries of origin.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {1069--1079} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.865},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/865}
}
Ady. “Indonesia Perlu Ratifikasi Konvensi Tentang Pengungsi.” hukumonline.com, 2012. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4f351aacc4a70/indonesiaperlu-ratifikasi-konvensi-tentang-pengungsi.
Aini, Desy Churul. “Pengaturan Tentang Status Hukum Illegal Immigrant Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional, Hukum Nasional Dan Penanganannya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SELAT Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji 2, no. 2 (2015): 244–61.
Butarbutar, Miranda Timothy. “Status Hukum Seorang Refugee Dan Akibat Hukumnya.” hukumonline.com, 2015. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/status-hukum-seorang-irefugee-i-dan-akibat-hukumnya-lt550541bf544d1.
Kondoy, Valerie Liany Gabriela. “Peranan Indonesia Dalam Menangani Pengungsi Terkait Konvensi 1951 (Convention Relating To The Status Of Refugees 1951).” Lex Et Societatis 8, no. 2 (2020): 107–18. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i2.28496.
Nilaputri, Intan, M Rifki Darmawan, and Raja Humala Martua S. “Kebijakan Penanganan Pengungsi Di Indonesia: Faktor Politik Penghambat Ratifikasi Konvensi Pengungsi Tahun 1951 Dan Protokol 1967.” In International Conference on Education and Global Studies (IConEGS). Kyoto, 2016.
Novianti. “Implementasi Perpres No. 125 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penanganan Pengungsi Dari Luar Negeri (The Implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 125 of 2016 on the Handling of International Refugees).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 10, no. 2 (2019): 259–80.
Rajagukguk, Eko Yudis Parlin, Suhaidi, Jelly Leviza, and Anggreni Atmei Lubis. “Peranan Petugas Imigrasi Terhadap Pengungsi Di Indonesia Terkait Dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011.” ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 1–10.
Royyan, Agastya Fatchur, Sri Lestari Rahayu, and Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo. “Urgensi Indonesia Meratifikasi The Convention Relating To The Status Of The Refugees 1967 Dan Protocol New York 1967 Mengenai Pengungsi Internasional.” BELLI AC PACIS: Jurnal Hukum Internasional 4, no. 1 (2008): 33–43.
Sitanala, Reiner Sukarnolus Dimitri. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengungsi Lintas Batas Negara Di Indonesia.” SASI 24, no. 1 (2018): 30–39. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.116.
Sultoni, Yahya. “Alasan Indonesia Belum Meratifikasi Konvensi 1951 Tentang Pengungsi Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengungsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Februari (2014): 1–14.
Wagiman. Hukum Pengungsi Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
: 3083 times
Download : 1795 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Urgensi Diratifikasinya Konvensi 1951 Tentang Pengungsi Perspektif Hukum Keimigrasian |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Tirza Siahaya; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Ratification; Convention; Refugee; Immigration |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Indonesia does not have any interest in relation to refugees because it has not become a party to the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol. Therefore, the Indonesian government also does not have the authority to grant refugee status. so that the arrangement of problems regarding refugees is determined by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN agency which deals with refugee matters in accordance with the mandate it received under the UNHCR Statute of 1950.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is the Urgency of Indonesia to ratify the Convention so that Indonesia has no difficulty dealing with refugees and there are clear and optimal rules regarding refugee issues. Methods of the Research: The research method used is juridical normative, the type of research is descriptive analytical, the source of the legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary materials. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature study and then analyzed using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the urgency of Indonesia to ratify the Convention so that Indonesia would not have difficulty dealing with refugees and that there were clear and optimal rules regarding refugee issues because so far the issue of refugees was not regulated in the Immigration Act but only regulates immigrants. However, it indirectly regulates refugees. Therefore, the rules applied to refugees in Indonesia to date are Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration, but do not contain specific handling and provisions (lex specialis). So that refugees who enter Indonesian territory are treated with the same mechanism as legal immigrants who are accommodated in the Migration Detention Center (RUDENIM) whose facilities are classified as inadequate, of course this can cause psychological pressure for refugees, especially since Indonesia has ratified the UDHR. The next thing is that they are deported and even repatriated, of course this violates the principles contained in the 1951 Convention, where the legal protection for refugees by the Indonesian government uses the principles contained in the 1951 Convention. So indirectly Indonesia has followed the provisions of the 1951 Convention. Therefore, it is not allowed if there are refugees who are returned to their countries of origin. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2022-01-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/865 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.865 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 11 (2022): Volume 1 Nomor 11, Januari 2022 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Tirza Siahaya, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
