Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti

Gunawan Tamher(1email), Ronald Saija(2), Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Informend Consent is an agreement that is given after receiving information. Approval of action to be taken by the doctor must be done without any element of coercion.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to determine the use of Informend Consent as evidence in civil disputes and the factors that influence it. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, the approach used in this research is the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this research is through a literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The use of medical approval as evidence of decision Number 114/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bjm was not carried out thoroughly so that it resulted in material and immaterial losses. Factors that influence the use of medical consent as evidence include; lack of patient knowledge, answering patient doubts, confirming procedures in laws and regulations, proving doctors in the feasibility of doing something related to medical work.

Keywords


Medical Approval; Evidence; Doctor and Patient

How To Cite


APA: Tamher, G., Saija, R., & Labetubun, M.H. (2022). Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(11), 1103–1119. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868
IEEE: G. Tamher, R. Saija, and M.H. Labetubun, "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1103–1119, Jan. 2022. Accessed on: Oct. 7, 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868
Harvard: Tamher, G., Saija, R., and Labetubun, M.H., (2022). "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(11), pp. 1103–1119. [Online]. Available at: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868 (Accessed on: 7 October 2022)
Chicago: Tamher, Gunawan, Ronald Saija, and Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun. "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 11 (January 31, 2022): 1103–1119. Accessed October 7, 2022. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868
Vancouver: Tamher G, Saija R, Labetubun MH. Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Jan 31 [cited 2022 Oct 7];1(11):1103–1119. Available from: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868
MLA 8th: Tamher, Gunawan, Ronald Saija, and Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun. "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 11, 31 Jan. 2022, pp. 1103–1119, https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868. Accessed 7 Oct. 2022.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI868,
		author = {Gunawan Tamher and Ronald Saija and Muchtar Anshary Labetubun},
		title = {Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {11},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Medical Approval; Evidence; Doctor and Patient},
		abstract = {Introduction: Informend Consent is an agreement that is given after receiving information. Approval of action to be taken by the doctor must be done without any element of coercion.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to determine the use of Informend Consent as evidence in civil disputes and the factors that influence it. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, the approach used in this research is the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this research is through a literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The use of medical approval as evidence of decision Number 114/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bjm was not carried out thoroughly so that it resulted in material and immaterial losses. Factors that influence the use of medical consent as evidence include; lack of patient knowledge, answering patient doubts, confirming procedures in laws and regulations, proving doctors in the feasibility of doing something related to medical work.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1103--1119}				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


Anwar, Arman. “Tanggung Gugat Resiko Dalam Aspek Hukum Kesehatan.” SASI 23, no. 2 (2018): 149–60.Astuti, Diah Widi. “Kedudukan Hukum Rekam Medis Dan Informed Consent Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Kasus Malpraktek.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2009.Dahlan, Sofwan. “Informed Constent.” Surakarta, 2005.Darsono, R. Soeraryo. “Etika Hukum Kesehatan Kedokteran (Sudut Pandang Praktikus).” Semarang, 2004.Fuady, Munir. Sumpah Hippocrates (Aspek Hukum Malpraktek Dokter). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.Guwandi, J. “Dugaan Malpraktek Medik & Draft RPP : “Perjanjian Terapetik Antara Dokter Dan Pasien.” Jakarta, 2006.Hanafiah, M. Jusuf, and Amri Amir. Etika Kedokteran Dan Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: EGC, 1999.Isfandyarie, Anny. Malpraktek Dan Resiko Medik Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Presasti Pustaka, 2005.Komalawati, D. Veronica. Hukum Dan Etika Dalam Praktek Dokter. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1989.Krisnawati, Ari. “Pembuktian Perkara Perdata.” Universitas Udayana, 2015.Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid. “Aspek Hukum Perdata Dalam Kesehatan.” In Etika Profesi & Aspek Hukum Bidang Kesehatan, 180–211. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung, 2020.Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.Saija, Ronald, and Roger F. X. V. Letsoin. Buku Ajar Hukum Perdata. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama, 2012.Subekti. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2003.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 50 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 98 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Gunawan Tamher, Ronald Saija, Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.