1. Home
  2. Vol 1, No 11 (2022)
  3. Tamher

Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti

Gunawan Tamher(1email), Ronald Saija(2), Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Informend Consent is an agreement that is given after receiving information. Approval of action to be taken by the doctor must be done without any element of coercion.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to determine the use of Informend Consent as evidence in civil disputes and the factors that influence it.

 

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, the approach used in this research is the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this research is through a literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods.

Results of the Research: The use of medical approval as evidence of decision Number 114/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bjm was not carried out thoroughly so that it resulted in material and immaterial losses. Factors that influence the use of medical consent as evidence include; lack of patient knowledge, answering patient doubts, confirming procedures in laws and regulations, proving doctors in the feasibility of doing something related to medical work.

Keywords


Medical Approval; Evidence; Doctor and Patient


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868

Published


2022-01-31

How To Cite


APA: Tamher, G., Saija, R., & Labetubun, M.H. (2022). Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(11), 1103–1119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868.
IEEE: G. Tamher, R. Saija, and M.H. Labetubun, "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1103–1119, Jan. 2022. Accessed on: May. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868
Harvard: Tamher, G., Saija, R., and Labetubun, M.H., (2022). "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(11), pp. 1103–1119. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868 (Accessed on: 10 May 2025)
Chicago: Tamher, Gunawan, Ronald Saija, and Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun. "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 11 (January 31, 2022): 1103–1119. Accessed May 10, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868
Vancouver: Tamher G, Saija R, Labetubun MH. Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Jan 31 [cited 2025 May 10];1(11):1103–1119. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868
MLA 8th: Tamher, Gunawan, Ronald Saija, and Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun. "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 11, 31 Jan. 2022, pp. 1103–1119, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868. Accessed 10 May. 2025.
BibTeX: 
@article{TATOHI868,
		author = {Gunawan Tamher and Ronald Saija and Muchtar Anshary Labetubun},
		title = {Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {11},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Medical Approval; Evidence; Doctor and Patient},
		abstract = {Introduction: Informend Consent is an agreement that is given after receiving information. Approval of action to be taken by the doctor must be done without any element of coercion.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to determine the use of Informend Consent as evidence in civil disputes and the factors that influence it. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, the approach used in this research is the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this research is through a literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The use of medical approval as evidence of decision Number 114/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bjm was not carried out thoroughly so that it resulted in material and immaterial losses. Factors that influence the use of medical consent as evidence include; lack of patient knowledge, answering patient doubts, confirming procedures in laws and regulations, proving doctors in the feasibility of doing something related to medical work.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1103--1119}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868}
		}
RefWorks:

   

Anwar, Arman. “Tanggung Gugat Resiko Dalam Aspek Hukum Kesehatan.” SASI 23, no. 2 (2018): 149–60.

Astuti, Diah Widi. “Kedudukan Hukum Rekam Medis Dan Informed Consent Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Kasus Malpraktek.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2009.

Dahlan, Sofwan. “Informed Constent.” Surakarta, 2005.

Darsono, R. Soeraryo. “Etika Hukum Kesehatan Kedokteran (Sudut Pandang Praktikus).” Semarang, 2004.

Fuady, Munir. Sumpah Hippocrates (Aspek Hukum Malpraktek Dokter). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.

Guwandi, J. “Dugaan Malpraktek Medik & Draft RPP : “Perjanjian Terapetik Antara Dokter Dan Pasien.” Jakarta, 2006.

Hanafiah, M. Jusuf, and Amri Amir. Etika Kedokteran Dan Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: EGC, 1999.

Isfandyarie, Anny. Malpraktek Dan Resiko Medik Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Presasti Pustaka, 2005.

Komalawati, D. Veronica. Hukum Dan Etika Dalam Praktek Dokter. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1989.

Krisnawati, Ari. “Pembuktian Perkara Perdata.” Universitas Udayana, 2015.

Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid. “Aspek Hukum Perdata Dalam Kesehatan.” In Etika Profesi & Aspek Hukum Bidang Kesehatan, 180–211. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung, 2020.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.

Saija, Ronald, and Roger F. X. V. Letsoin. Buku Ajar Hukum Perdata. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama, 2012.

Subekti. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2003.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 784 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 3721 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Gunawan Tamher; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Ronald Saija; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Medical Approval; Evidence; Doctor and Patient
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: Informend Consent is an agreement that is given after receiving information. Approval of action to be taken by the doctor must be done without any element of coercion.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to determine the use of Informend Consent as evidence in civil disputes and the factors that influence it. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, the approach used in this research is the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this research is through a literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The use of medical approval as evidence of decision Number 114/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bjm was not carried out thoroughly so that it resulted in material and immaterial losses. Factors that influence the use of medical consent as evidence include; lack of patient knowledge, answering patient doubts, confirming procedures in laws and regulations, proving doctors in the feasibility of doing something related to medical work.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-01-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/868
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 11 (2022): Volume 1 Nomor 11, Januari 2022
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Gunawan Tamher, Ronald Saija, Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.