Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif

Marcellino Lessil(1email), Elsa Rina Maya Toule(2), Denny Latumaerissa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The crime of forgery of letters committed by prospective members of the legislature, legally the crime of forgery that occurs is a form of general election crime.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine, examine, and analyze the application of the law and the reasons for termination in the case of falsification of evidence C-1 recap in the legislative election process.

 

Methods of the Research: The research method in this writing uses a normative juridical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses library research, as well as legal material analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.

Results of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a normative juridical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses library research, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques

Keywords


Counterfeiting; Legislative Elections; Evidence


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870

Published


2022-01-31

How To Cite


APA: Lessil, M., Toule, E.R., & Latumaerissa, D. (2022). Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(11), 1130–1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870.
IEEE: M. Lessil, E.R. Toule, and D. Latumaerissa, "Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1130–1140, Jan. 2022. Accessed on: May. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870
Harvard: Lessil, M., Toule, E.R., and Latumaerissa, D., (2022). "Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(11), pp. 1130–1140. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870 (Accessed on: 10 May 2025)
Chicago: Lessil, Marcellino, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Denny Latumaerissa. "Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 11 (January 31, 2022): 1130–1140. Accessed May 10, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870
Vancouver: Lessil M, Toule ER, Latumaerissa D. Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Jan 31 [cited 2025 May 10];1(11):1130–1140. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870
MLA 8th: Lessil, Marcellino, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Denny Latumaerissa. "Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 11, 31 Jan. 2022, pp. 1130–1140, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870. Accessed 10 May. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI870,
		author = {Marcellino Lessil and Elsa Toule and Denny Latumaerissa},
		title = {Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {11},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Counterfeiting; Legislative Elections; Evidence},
		abstract = {Introduction: The crime of forgery of letters committed by prospective members of the legislature, legally the crime of forgery that occurs is a form of general election crime.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine, examine, and analyze the application of the law and the reasons for termination in the case of falsification of evidence C-1 recap in the legislative election process. Methods of the Research: The research method in this writing uses a normative juridical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses library research, as well as legal material analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a normative juridical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses library research, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1130--1140}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/870}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Al-Iman, Abu Nashr Muhammad. Membongkar Dosa-Dosa Pemilu. Jakarta: Prisma Media, 2004.

Darmodiharjo, Darji. Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa Dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Idonesia. Translated by Visi Media. Jakarta, 2004.

Latumaerissa, Denny. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Penerapan Ancaman Pidana Mati Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” SASI 20, no. 1 (2014): 8–18.

Neloe, Edward Cornelis William. Pemberian Kredit Bank Menjadi Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Verbum Publishing, 2012.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas, 2006.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Sugianto, Bambang. “Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Dan Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Pidana Pemilu Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017.” Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 3 (2017): 295–318.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 857 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 1241 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Pemalsuan Bukti C1 Rekapan Pada Proses Pemilihan Legislatif
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Marcellino Lessil; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Elsa Rina Maya Toule; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Denny Latumaerissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Counterfeiting; Legislative Elections; Evidence
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: The crime of forgery of letters committed by prospective members of the legislature, legally the crime of forgery that occurs is a form of general election crime.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine, examine, and analyze the application of the law and the reasons for termination in the case of falsification of evidence C-1 recap in the legislative election process. Methods of the Research: The research method in this writing uses a normative juridical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses library research, as well as legal material analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a normative juridical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses library research, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-01-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/870
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.870
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 11 (2022): Volume 1 Nomor 11, Januari 2022
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Marcellino Lessil, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Denny Latumaerissa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.