Wewenang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Pemeriksaan Maladministrasi Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan Pegawai Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
), Victor Juzuf Sedubun(2), Eric Stenly Holle(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Law Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman gives authority to the Ombudsman to supervise and examine the implementation of public services for maladministration by state officials. However, in carrying out its authority, the ombudsman is faced with the problem of the KPK TWK and receives a report on the maladministration of the KPK employee TWK, so this raises the issue of whether the KPK employee TWK is part of maladministration and part of the administration of public services.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to find out the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to examine maladministration of the national insight test of employees of the corruption eradication commission.
Methods of the Research: Type of research used is normative, namely research that is based on the rule of law that can provide an explanation of the problems being studied. The problem approach is the legal approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of legal materials through primary legal materials is then linked to secondary legal materials.
Results of the Research: Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to examine maladministration of the national insight test of corruption eradication commission employees, as that the TWK of KPK employees is part of the object of maladministration examination which is a term related to the duties of the ombudsman according to the form and concept of maladministration and based on article 1 number 3 Law No. 37 of 2008. and TWK of KPK employees are part of public services within the scope of administrative services as referred to in Article 5 paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 46 paragraph (1) of Law Number 25 of 2009 and as well as maladministration in the implementation TWK which resulted in 51 KPK employees being dismissed, so that KPK employees reported TWK maladministration to the ombudsman. Thus the ombudsman carries out his duties and functions in examining the TWK of KPK employees according to the provisions of Article 6 and Article 7 of Law No. 37 of 2008 which gives the ombudsman the authority to receive maladministration reports.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.881
Published
2022-02-28
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI881,
author = {Dedi Tuarita and Victor Sedubun and Eric Holle},
title = {Wewenang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Pemeriksaan Maladministrasi Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan Pegawai Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {12},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Ombudsman Authority; Maladministration; Public service},
abstract = {Introduction: Law Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman gives authority to the Ombudsman to supervise and examine the implementation of public services for maladministration by state officials. However, in carrying out its authority, the ombudsman is faced with the problem of the KPK TWK and receives a report on the maladministration of the KPK employee TWK, so this raises the issue of whether the KPK employee TWK is part of maladministration and part of the administration of public services.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to find out the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to examine maladministration of the national insight test of employees of the corruption eradication commission. Methods of the Research: Type of research used is normative, namely research that is based on the rule of law that can provide an explanation of the problems being studied. The problem approach is the legal approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of legal materials through primary legal materials is then linked to secondary legal materials.Results of the Research: Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to examine maladministration of the national insight test of corruption eradication commission employees, as that the TWK of KPK employees is part of the object of maladministration examination which is a term related to the duties of the ombudsman according to the form and concept of maladministration and based on article 1 number 3 Law No. 37 of 2008. and TWK of KPK employees are part of public services within the scope of administrative services as referred to in Article 5 paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 46 paragraph (1) of Law Number 25 of 2009 and as well as maladministration in the implementation TWK which resulted in 51 KPK employees being dismissed, so that KPK employees reported TWK maladministration to the ombudsman. Thus the ombudsman carries out his duties and functions in examining the TWK of KPK employees according to the provisions of Article 6 and Article 7 of Law No. 37 of 2008 which gives the ombudsman the authority to receive maladministration reports.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {1270--1283} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.881},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/881}
}
Dewi, Dyah Adriantini Sintha. “Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sangketa Maladministrasi Oleh Ombudsman.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat 11, no. 2 (2016): 111–24.
Hamidi, Jazim. Penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahanyang Layak (AAUPL) Dilingkungan Peradilan Administrasi Indonesia (Upaya Menuju Clean And Stable Government). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2009.
Hartono, Sunaryati. Panduan Investigasi Untuk Ombudsman Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Ombudsman Nasional, 2003.
Nurtjahjo, Hendra. Memahami Maladministrasi. Jakarta: Komisi Ombudsman Nasional, 2013.
Purwanto, Erwan Agus. Pelayanan Publik Modul Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Dasar Kader PNS. Jakarta: Lembaga Admnistrasi Negara Republik Indonesia, 2016.
Remaja, Gede Nyoman. “Makna Hukum Dan Kepastian Hukum.” Kertha Widya 2, no. 1 (2014): 1–26.
Sari, Fitri Kartika, and Agustin C Karay. “Kewenangan Ombudsman Sebagai Lembaga Independen Dalam Pelaksanaan Laporan Masyarakat.” Adil: Jurnal Hukum STIH YPM 2, no. 1 (2020): 13–24.
Sellang, Kamarudin. Administarsi Dan Pelayanan Publik Antara Teori Dan Aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: Ombak, 2016.
Stenly Holle, Eric. “Pelayanan Publik Melalui Electronic Government: Upaya Meminimalisir Praktek Maladministrasi Dalam Meningkatan Public Service.” SASI 17, no. 3 (2011): 21–30.
Sujata, Antonius. Ombudsman Indonesia, Masa Lalu, Sekarang Dan Masa Mendatang. Jakarta: Komisi Ombudsman Nasional, 2002.
Winarso. “Transisi Menuju Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.” Suara Ombudsman, no. 3 (2008): 3.
: 961 times
Download : 1341 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Dedi Rusman Tuarita, Victor Juzuf Sedubun, Eric Stenly Holle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
