Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan
), Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena(2), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) clarifies China's claim regarding historic rights in relation to maritime areas in the South China Sea which are claimed using the nine-dash line, which is contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 it was contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has declared that the area(Reed Bank) is within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone.
Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to understand and determine the nature of the decision of the permanent court of arbitration in the dispute between the Philippines-China in the South China Sea.
Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a prescriptive analytical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through books, articles, journals and the writings of legal experts, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.
Results of the Research: The result obtained is that the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is final and binding, meaning it must be respected and obeyed by the parties to the dispute, therefore China's argument regarding the nine dash line is an international violation because it does not respect the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as a the institution that handles the dispute has issued a decision. The implication of the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) for security stability in the South China Sea is that the PCA decision related to the SCS dispute is a clarification or interpretation of the PCA against the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention so that it can become a source of law that is generally accepted or binding on all countries. The PCA decision can be used as a means to weaken China's argument.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893
Published
2022-03-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI893,
author = {Yavier Pattiasina and Josina Augustina Wattimena and Johanis Peilouw},
title = {Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Court Of Arbitration; Disputes; Philippines-China And Its Implications},
abstract = {Introduction: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) clarifies China's claim regarding historic rights in relation to maritime areas in the South China Sea which are claimed using the nine-dash line, which is contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 it was contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has declared that the area(Reed Bank) is within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to understand and determine the nature of the decision of the permanent court of arbitration in the dispute between the Philippines-China in the South China Sea. Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a prescriptive analytical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through books, articles, journals and the writings of legal experts, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The result obtained is that the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is final and binding, meaning it must be respected and obeyed by the parties to the dispute, therefore China's argument regarding the nine dash line is an international violation because it does not respect the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as a the institution that handles the dispute has issued a decision. The implication of the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) for security stability in the South China Sea is that the PCA decision related to the SCS dispute is a clarification or interpretation of the PCA against the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention so that it can become a source of law that is generally accepted or binding on all countries. The PCA decision can be used as a means to weaken China's argument.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {13--24} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/893}
}
Abdurrasyid, H. Priyatna. Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska, 2002.
Afriani Susant, Kenali ASEAN, Kemlu Ajak Para Rektor Bentuk Pusat Studi ASEAN, Oke Zone News, https://news.okezone.com/read/2016/12/01/65/1555795/kenali-aseankemlu-ajak-para-rektor-bentuk-pusat-studi-asean
Agoes, Etty R. Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982 Masalah Pengaturan Hak Lintas Kapal Asing. Jakarta: Abardi, 1991.
Anwar, Chairyl. ZEE Di Dalam Hukum Internasional Dan ZEE Asia Pasifik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1995.
Djalal, Hasjim. “Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea.” International Challenges 10, no. 2 (1990): 39–44.
https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/buku_tim/buku-tim-public-25.pdf
http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/16812/3/HK117852.pdf
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/26551-ID-efektivitas-dan-efisiensi-alternative-dispute-resolution-adr-sebagai-salah-satu.pdf
https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/assets/resource/ebook/36.pdf
“Konflik Laut Cina Selatan dan Posis Strategis Indonesia” dalam http://analisismiliter.com/artikel/part/36/Konflik_Laut_Cina_Selatan_dan_Posisi_Strategis_Indonesia
Kresno, Buntoro. Buntoro Kresno, “Alur Laut Kepulauan Indonesia (ALKI) Prospek Dan Kendala Selatan. Jakarta: Sekolah Staf dan Komando, 2012.
Margono, Suyud. ADR Dan Arbitrase, Proses Pelembagaan Dan Aspek Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.
Menanggapi Klaim Terbaru Beijing Terhadap Laut Cina Selatan” dalam https://id-id.facebook.com/notes/moeldoko/menanggapi-klaim-terbaru-beijing-terhadap-laut-cina-selatan/444020405744606/
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2015.
“Sengketa Wilayah Laut Cina Selatan” dalam http://apdforum.com/id/article/rmiap/articles/online/features/2012/12/31/a-ayear-end-story
Sodik, Dikdik Mohamad. Hukum Laut Internasional Dan Pengaturannya Di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2014.
Syafrida. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sebagai Solusi Mewujudkan Asas Pemeriksaan Perkara ‘Sederhana, Waktu Singkat Dan Biaya Murah.’” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 7, no. 4 (2020): 353–70. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i4.15167.
“The Spratly Islands Dispute in the South China Sea: Problems, Policies, and Prospects for Diplomatic Accommodation” dalam http://www.southchinasea.org
Wulandari, B Tjandra. Tinjauan Hukum Laut Internasional. Jakarta: Alumni, 2003.
: 1424 times
Download : 5817 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Yavier Pattiasina; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Court Of Arbitration; Disputes; Philippines-China And Its Implications |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) clarifies China's claim regarding historic rights in relation to maritime areas in the South China Sea which are claimed using the nine-dash line, which is contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 it was contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has declared that the area(Reed Bank) is within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to understand and determine the nature of the decision of the permanent court of arbitration in the dispute between the Philippines-China in the South China Sea. Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a prescriptive analytical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through books, articles, journals and the writings of legal experts, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The result obtained is that the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is final and binding, meaning it must be respected and obeyed by the parties to the dispute, therefore China's argument regarding the nine dash line is an international violation because it does not respect the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as a the institution that handles the dispute has issued a decision. The implication of the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) for security stability in the South China Sea is that the PCA decision related to the SCS dispute is a clarification or interpretation of the PCA against the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention so that it can become a source of law that is generally accepted or binding on all countries. The PCA decision can be used as a means to weaken China's argument. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2022-03-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/893 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 2, No 1 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 1, Maret 2022 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Yavier Pattiasina, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
