Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan

Yavier Pattiasina(1email), Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena(2), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) clarifies China's claim regarding historic rights in relation to maritime areas in the South China Sea which are claimed using the nine-dash line, which is contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 it was contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has declared that the area(Reed Bank) is within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone.

Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to understand and determine the nature of the decision of the permanent court of arbitration in the dispute between the Philippines-China in the South China Sea.

 

Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a prescriptive analytical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through books, articles, journals and the writings of legal experts, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.

Results of the Research: The result obtained is that the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is final and binding, meaning it must be respected and obeyed by the parties to the dispute, therefore China's argument regarding the nine dash line is an international violation because it does not respect the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as a the institution that handles the dispute has issued a decision. The implication of the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) for security stability in the South China Sea is that the PCA decision related to the SCS dispute is a clarification or interpretation of the PCA against the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention so that it can become a source of law that is generally accepted or binding on all countries. The PCA decision can be used as a means to weaken China's argument.

Keywords


Court Of Arbitration; Disputes; Philippines-China And Its Implications


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893

Published


2022-03-31

How To Cite


APA: Pattiasina, Y., Wattimena, J.Y., & Peilouw, J.S. (2022). Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 13–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893.
IEEE: Y. Pattiasina, J.Y. Wattimena, and J.S. Peilouw, "Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–24, Mar. 2022. Accessed on: Jun. 7, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893
Harvard: Pattiasina, Y., Wattimena, J.Y., and Peilouw, J.S., (2022). "Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(1), pp. 13–24. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893 (Accessed on: 7 June 2025)
Chicago: Pattiasina, Yavier, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, and Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw. "Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (March 31, 2022): 13–24. Accessed June 7, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893
Vancouver: Pattiasina Y, Wattimena JY, Peilouw JS. Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Mar 31 [cited 2025 Jun 7];2(1):13–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893
MLA 8th: Pattiasina, Yavier, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, and Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw. "Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 1, 31 Mar. 2022, pp. 13–24, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893. Accessed 7 Jun. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI893,
		author = {Yavier Pattiasina and Josina Augustina Wattimena and Johanis Peilouw},
		title = {Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {1},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Court Of Arbitration; Disputes; Philippines-China And Its Implications},
		abstract = {Introduction: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) clarifies China's claim regarding historic rights in relation to maritime areas in the South China Sea which are claimed using the nine-dash line, which is contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 it was contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has declared that the area(Reed Bank) is within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to understand and determine the nature of the decision of the permanent court of arbitration in the dispute between the Philippines-China in the South China Sea. Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a prescriptive analytical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through books, articles, journals and the writings of legal experts, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The result obtained is that the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is final and binding, meaning it must be respected and obeyed by the parties to the dispute, therefore China's argument regarding the nine dash line is an international violation because it does not respect the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as a the institution that handles the dispute has issued a decision. The implication of the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) for security stability in the South China Sea is that the PCA decision related to the SCS dispute is a clarification or interpretation of the PCA against the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention so that it can become a source of law that is generally accepted or binding on all countries. The PCA decision can be used as a means to weaken China's argument.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {13--24}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/893}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Abdurrasyid, H. Priyatna. Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska, 2002.

Afriani Susant, Kenali ASEAN, Kemlu Ajak Para Rektor Bentuk Pusat Studi ASEAN, Oke Zone News, https://news.okezone.com/read/2016/12/01/65/1555795/kenali-aseankemlu-ajak-para-rektor-bentuk-pusat-studi-asean

Agoes, Etty R. Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982 Masalah Pengaturan Hak Lintas Kapal Asing. Jakarta: Abardi, 1991.

Anwar, Chairyl. ZEE Di Dalam Hukum Internasional Dan ZEE Asia Pasifik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1995.

Djalal, Hasjim. “Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea.” International Challenges 10, no. 2 (1990): 39–44.

https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/buku_tim/buku-tim-public-25.pdf

http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/16812/3/HK117852.pdf

https://kumparan.com/regent-252000/arbitrase-sebagai-alternatif-upaya-penyelesaian-konflik-1uldxC5BJMm

https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/26551-ID-efektivitas-dan-efisiensi-alternative-dispute-resolution-adr-sebagai-salah-satu.pdf

https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/assets/resource/ebook/36.pdf

https://repository.usm.ac.id/files/journalnas/A002/20170518102458-Pengaturan-Dan-Mekanisme-Penyelesaian-Sengketa-Nonlitigasi-Di-Bidang-Perdagangan.pdf

https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2257390/pengerahan-milisi-laut-dalam-sengketa-di-laut-china-selatan

https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-manado/baca-artikel/13628/Arbitrase-Dan-Alternatif-Penyelesaian-Sengketa.html

“Konflik Laut Cina Selatan dan Posis Strategis Indonesia” dalam http://analisismiliter.com/artikel/part/36/Konflik_Laut_Cina_Selatan_dan_Posisi_Strategis_Indonesia

Kresno, Buntoro. Buntoro Kresno, “Alur Laut Kepulauan Indonesia (ALKI) Prospek Dan Kendala Selatan. Jakarta: Sekolah Staf dan Komando, 2012.

Margono, Suyud. ADR Dan Arbitrase, Proses Pelembagaan Dan Aspek Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.

Menanggapi Klaim Terbaru Beijing Terhadap Laut Cina Selatan” dalam https://id-id.facebook.com/notes/moeldoko/menanggapi-klaim-terbaru-beijing-terhadap-laut-cina-selatan/444020405744606/

Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2015.

“Sengketa Wilayah Laut Cina Selatan” dalam http://apdforum.com/id/article/rmiap/articles/online/features/2012/12/31/a-ayear-end-story

Sodik, Dikdik Mohamad. Hukum Laut Internasional Dan Pengaturannya Di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2014.

Syafrida. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sebagai Solusi Mewujudkan Asas Pemeriksaan Perkara ‘Sederhana, Waktu Singkat Dan Biaya Murah.’” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 7, no. 4 (2020): 353–70. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i4.15167.

The Spratly Islands Dispute in the South China Sea: Problems, Policies, and Prospects for Diplomatic Accommodation” dalam http://www.southchinasea.org

Wulandari, B Tjandra. Tinjauan Hukum Laut Internasional. Jakarta: Alumni, 2003.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1424 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 5817 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Yavier Pattiasina; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Court Of Arbitration; Disputes; Philippines-China And Its Implications
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) clarifies China's claim regarding historic rights in relation to maritime areas in the South China Sea which are claimed using the nine-dash line, which is contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 it was contrary to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention because in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has declared that the area(Reed Bank) is within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to understand and determine the nature of the decision of the permanent court of arbitration in the dispute between the Philippines-China in the South China Sea. Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a prescriptive analytical research type. The research approach used is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through books, articles, journals and the writings of legal experts, as well as legal materials analysis techniques in this study using qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The result obtained is that the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is final and binding, meaning it must be respected and obeyed by the parties to the dispute, therefore China's argument regarding the nine dash line is an international violation because it does not respect the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as a the institution that handles the dispute has issued a decision. The implication of the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) for security stability in the South China Sea is that the PCA decision related to the SCS dispute is a clarification or interpretation of the PCA against the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention so that it can become a source of law that is generally accepted or binding on all countries. The PCA decision can be used as a means to weaken China's argument.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-03-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/893
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.893
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 2, No 1 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 1, Maret 2022
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Yavier Pattiasina, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.