Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Waralaba Dalam Pemutusan Perjanjian Secara Sepihak
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: A franchise agreement is a special agreement or also called an anonymous agreement, because it is not found in the Civil Code.
Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to examine and discuss legal protection for franchisees related to unilateral termination of agreements made by the franchisor.
Methods of the Research: The method used is a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach.
Results of the Research: The results obtained from the research, the impact of unilateral termination of the agreement causes franchisees to sue and resolve disputes by way of deliberation by giving a warning or subpoena and also through out-of-court channels in accordance with Law Number 30 of 1999 paragraph (1) concerning Arbitration and alternative dispute resolution. This is also inseparable from the franchisor's responsibility for unilaterally terminating the agreement to the franchisee and the franchisee has the right to claim losses in accordance with Article 1243-1252 of the Civil Code.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.894
Published
2022-03-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI894, author = {Arifin Rappe and Sarah Kuahaty and Theresia Pesulima}, title = {Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Waralaba Dalam Pemutusan Perjanjian Secara Sepihak}, journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, year = {2022}, keywords = {Legal Protection; Franchise Agreement; Termination of Agreement}, abstract = {Introduction: A franchise agreement is a special agreement or also called an anonymous agreement, because it is not found in the Civil Code.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to examine and discuss legal protection for franchisees related to unilateral termination of agreements made by the franchisor. Methods of the Research: The method used is a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: The results obtained from the research, the impact of unilateral termination of the agreement causes franchisees to sue and resolve disputes by way of deliberation by giving a warning or subpoena and also through out-of-court channels in accordance with Law Number 30 of 1999 paragraph (1) concerning Arbitration and alternative dispute resolution. This is also inseparable from the franchisor's responsibility for unilaterally terminating the agreement to the franchisee and the franchisee has the right to claim losses in accordance with Article 1243-1252 of the Civil Code.}, issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {25--33} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i1.894}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/894} }
Agustina, Rosa. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
Amalia, Ifada Qurrata A’yun. “Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam Putusan Nomor 1572 K/PDT/2015 Berdasarkan Pasal 1320 Dan 1338 KUH Perdata.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 1, no. 1 (2018): 61–72.
Fuady, Munir. Konsep Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
Hendra, Amores. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Franchise Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Tentang Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual.” Universitas Sumatra Utara, 2008.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1989.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Bandung: Sumur, 1993.
Rusli, Tami. “Analisis Terhadap Perjanjian Waralaba (Franchise) Usaha Toko Alfa Mart (Studi Pada PT Sumber Alfairia Trijaya Tbk.” Keadilan Progresif 6, no. 1 (2015): 64–75.
Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Jakarta: Intermasa, 2003.
Sumardi, Juajir. Aspek-Aspek Hukum Franchise Dan Perusahaan Transnasional. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1995.
Usman, Nurainy, Merry Tjoanda, and Saartje Sarah Alfons. “Akibat Hukum Dari Pemutusan Kontrak Secara Sepihak.” Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 1 (2021): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.561.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Arifin Rappe, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty, Theresia Louize Pesulima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.