Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika

Matheos Bastian Wattimena(1email), Elsa Rina Maya Toule(2), Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Narcotics abuse is the use of narcotics not for medicinal purposes, which causes changes in physical and psychological functions and causes dependence without a prescription and without the supervision of a doctor. Meanwhile, narcotics illicit trafficking is any activity or series of activities carried out without rights or against the law which is determined as a narcotics crime.

Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to apply the teachings of participating in decisions in the Masohi District Court Decision.

 

Methods of the Research: The type of legal research carried out is normative juridical, with sources of legal material in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The problem approach is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials is done by first collecting primary legal materials and then linking them to secondary legal materials. The processing and analysis of legal materials is described qualitatively.

Results of the Research: Narcotics abuse is the use of Narcotics for no purpose, which causes changes in function and psychological treatment and causes physical dependence without a prescription and without a doctor's supervision. Meanwhile, illicit drug trafficking is any activity or desire carried out without rights or against the law which is determined as a narcotics crime. One example of a case based on the decision of the Masohi District Court Number 12/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Msh and Number 12/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Msh carried out by the two defendants named Trikarna Lewenussa Alias Cetril and Rosihan Anwar Sahulau Alias Andri.

Keywords


Narcotics; Application of The Teachings of Participation; Criminal Liability

How To Cite


APA: Wattimena, M.B., Toule, E.R., & Latupeirissa, J.E. (2022). Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(3), 262–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919.
IEEE: M.B. Wattimena, E.R. Toule, and J.E. Latupeirissa, "Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 262–271, Apr. 2022. Accessed on: Apr. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919
Harvard: Wattimena, M.B., Toule, E.R., and Latupeirissa, J.E., (2022). "Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(3), pp. 262–271. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919 (Accessed on: 19 April 2024)
Chicago: Wattimena, Matheos Bastian, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 3 (April 28, 2022): 262–271. Accessed April 19, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919
Vancouver: Wattimena MB, Toule ER, Latupeirissa JE. Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Apr 28 [cited 2024 Apr 19];2(3):262–271. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919
MLA 8th: Wattimena, Matheos Bastian, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 3, 28 Apr. 2022, pp. 262–271, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919. Accessed 19 Apr. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI919,
		author = {Matheos Wattimena and Elsa Toule and Julianus Latupeirissa},
		title = {Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {3},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Narcotics; Application of The Teachings of Participation; Criminal Liability},
		abstract = {Introduction: Narcotics abuse is the use of narcotics not for medicinal purposes, which causes changes in physical and psychological functions and causes dependence without a prescription and without the supervision of a doctor. Meanwhile, narcotics illicit trafficking is any activity or series of activities carried out without rights or against the law which is determined as a narcotics crime.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to apply the teachings of participating in decisions in the Masohi District Court Decision. Methods of the Research: The type of legal research carried out is normative juridical, with sources of legal material in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The problem approach is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The procedure for collecting legal materials is done by first collecting primary legal materials and then linking them to secondary legal materials. The processing and analysis of legal materials is described qualitatively.Results of the Research: Narcotics abuse is the use of Narcotics for no purpose, which causes changes in function and psychological treatment and causes physical dependence without a prescription and without a doctor's supervision. Meanwhile, illicit drug trafficking is any activity or desire carried out without rights or against the law which is determined as a narcotics crime. One example of a case based on the decision of the Masohi District Court Number 12/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Msh and Number 12/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Msh carried out by the two defendants named Trikarna Lewenussa Alias Cetril and Rosihan Anwar Sahulau Alias Andri.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {262--271}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/919}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Badan Narkotika Nasional. Pedoman Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Bagi Pemuda. Jakarta: BNN RI, 2011.

Harahap, M Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penetapan KUHAP Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan. Bandung: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Hartanti, Eva. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Huda, Chairul. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.

Latumaerissa, Denny. “Studi Tentang Pemberian Remisi Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Pada Lapas Klas II Ambon.” SASI 23, no. 1 (2017): 64–72.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Pajar, Widodo. Menjadi Hakim Progresif. Bandar Lampung: Indeph Publishing, 2013.

Rifai, Ahmad. Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Siswanto, H. Politik Hukum Dalam Undang Undang Narkotika (Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2012.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. Metode Penemuan Hukum (Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Pasti Dan Berkeadilan). Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2015.

Wahyono, Padmo. Bahan-Bahan Pedoman Penghaytan Dan Pengamalan Pancasila. Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1984.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1086 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 2070 times



DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v2i3.919

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Matheos Bastian Wattimena, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.