Perspektif Sanksi Pidana Kurator Menurut Hukum Kepailitan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v1i1.480Keywords:
Curator, Bankruptcy, Criminal SanctionsAbstract
Introduction: Some bankruptcy cases eventually evolve into criminal matters when a bankruptcy curator who is responsible in handling and administering bankruptcy case is positioned as defendant charged for conducting criminal acts.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of writing is to find out and analyze the perspective of curator criminal sanctions according to bankruptcy law.
Methods of the Research: Normative juridical research, namely an approach based on legal materials by examining concepts, legal principles and legislation related to this research.
Results of the Research: Criminal sanctions for non-independent curators aimed at preventing the curator from committing criminal acts in the course of the execution of the duty and maintenance tasks. Here, the role of criminal law is as a guardian of the norms that exist in the Law on Bankruptcy related to the duties and responsibilities of the curator. In order for a curator or committee before declaring his willingness to accept the duties and responsibilities of the consequences of the bankruptcy verdict or the postponement of the debt obligation obligation (PKPU) really ensure that he will not commit a disgraceful act of.
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Bertens, K. Etika. Revisi. Jakarta: Kanisius, 2015.
Efensi, Erdianto. Hukum Pidana Indonesia - Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Refika Aditama, 2011.
Loqman, Loebby. “Aspek Pidana Dalam Hukum Kepailitan.” Rangkaian Lokakarya Terbatas Masalah-Masalah Kepailitan Dan Wawasan Hukum Bisnis Lainnya, 2004.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007. https://doi.org/340.072.
Purwoleksono, Didik Endro. Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press dengan LP3 Universitas Airlangga, 2013.
Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan. “Interpretasi Tentang Makna Utang Jatuh Tempo Dalam Perkara Kepailitan.” Jakarta, 2013.
Saija, Ronald. “Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Dalam Prosedur Permohonan Pailit Di Pengadilan Niaga.” SASI 24, no. 1 (2018): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.114.
———. “Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga.” SASI 24, no. 2 (2018): 114–23. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126.
Sapardjaja, Komariah Emong. Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materiel Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia, (Studi Kasus Tentang Penerapan Dan Perkembangannya Dalam Yurisprudensi). Jakarta: Alumni, 2002.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Peraturan Perundang Undangan Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Grafiti Press, 2007.
Sunarmi. Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Softmedia, 2010.
Wahjoepramono, Eka Julianta. Konsekuensi Hukum Dalam Profesi Medik. Jakarta: Karya Putra Darwati, 2012.
Yuherawan, Deni Setya Bagus. Kritik Ideologis Terhadap Dasar Kefilsafatan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ronald Saija
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
