Kekuatan Hukum Terhadap Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Yang Tidak Menjalankan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara
), Saartje Sarah Alfons(2), Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter abbreviated to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia), Article 24 paragraph (1) states that "Judicial power is an independent power to administer justice to uphold law and justice" and paragraph (2) states that " Judicial power is exercised by a Supreme Court and judicial bodies under it in the general court environment, the religious court environment, the military court environment, the state administrative court environment, and by a Constitutional Court.
Purposes of the Research: To find out and analyze the legal force of State Administrative Officials who do not carry out the Decisions of the State Administrative Court.
Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research with analytical descriptive nature. This research is intended to obtain normative clarity by identifying and analyzing the application of sanctions against State Administrative Officials who do not implement the Decisions of the State Administrative Court with permanent legal force.
Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the weak implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions is due to the absence of an executorial institution and coercive power in implementing State Administrative Court Decisions, so that the implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions depends on the awareness and initiative of State Administrative Officials.Keywords
How To Cite
@article{saniri1317,
author = {Muhammad Hayoto and Saartje Alfons and Dezonda Pattipawae},
title = {Kekuatan Hukum Terhadap Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Yang Tidak Menjalankan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara},
journal = {Jurnal Saniri},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Application of Sanctions; State Administrative Officer; Permanent Legal Force},
abstract = {Introduction: The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter abbreviated to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia), Article 24 paragraph (1) states that "Judicial power is an independent power to administer justice to uphold law and justice" and paragraph (2) states that " Judicial power is exercised by a Supreme Court and judicial bodies under it in the general court environment, the religious court environment, the military court environment, the state administrative court environment, and by a Constitutional Court.Purposes of the Research: To find out and analyze the legal force of State Administrative Officials who do not carry out the Decisions of the State Administrative Court.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research with analytical descriptive nature. This research is intended to obtain normative clarity by identifying and analyzing the application of sanctions against State Administrative Officials who do not implement the Decisions of the State Administrative Court with permanent legal force.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the weak implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions is due to the absence of an executorial institution and coercive power in implementing State Administrative Court Decisions, so that the implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions depends on the awareness and initiative of State Administrative Officials.},
issn = {2774-1850}, pages = {1--12} url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/1317}
}
Jurnal
Agus Sujiono, dkk, Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jurnal Tatohi, Vol. 1 Nomor IV, Juni 2021.
Dezonda R. Pattipawae, Putusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Memiliki KekuatanEksekutorial Tidak Dipatuhi Oleh Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara, Jurnal Saniri, Vol. Nomor I, Ambon, November 2020, hal. 2-3.
Dezonda R. Pattipawae, Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Dalam Penerapan Eksekusi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom)Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Guna Mewujudkan Asas-Asas Umumpemerintahan Yang Baik, Disertasi, Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, 2020, hal 201-202.
Irfan Fachruddi, Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilantata Usaha Negara, Makalah. Disampaikan pada Rakerda Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Bidang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Wilayah Sumatera, pada tanggal 2 November 2009 di Medan, hal. 1.
Supandi, Kepatuhan Pejabat Dalam Mentaati Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Medan, Disertasi Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2005, hal . 235-240.
Buku
C.S.T. Kansil, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1996, hal. 78.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, hukum acara pengadilan tata usaha negara, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2022, hal. 165.
Paulus Effendi Lotulung, Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan, Salemba Humanika, Jakarta, 2013, hal. 7.
Paulus Effendi Lotulung,beberapa system tentang control segi hukum terhadap pemerintahan, Bhuana Ilmu Populer, Jakrta, 2000, hal. 5.
Soemaryo, Tuntutan Praktek Beracara Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Primamedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 1999, hal. 92.
Supandi, Ganti Rugi Akibat Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintah Dalam Ruu Administrasi Pemerintahan Dan Prospek Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, PT. Sofemdia, Medan, 2004, hal. 2-3.
Wicipto Setiadi, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004, hal.98.
Yuslim, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2015, hal. 165.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 336 times
Download : 357 times
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Rifandi Hayoto, Saartje Sarah Alfons, Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
