Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati

Glen Jantje Waelaruno(1email), Julista Mustamu(2), Marlien Irene Matitaputty(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The presence of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration which consists of 89 articles is intended to create an orderly administration of Government Administration, create legal certainty, prevent abuse of authority, ensure the accountability of Government Agencies and/or Officials, provide legal protection to citizens and the apparatus. the government implements the provisions of laws and regulations and applies the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), and provides the best possible service to the citizens. the concept of the rule of law, the concept of state institutions and government institutions, the concept of authority and the concept of good government.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to describe APIP's authority in the PDAM corruption case in Saumlaki and to find out the legal consequences of the abuse of authority by APIP in the PDAM corruption case in Saumlaki.

Methods of the Research : This method used is a normative juridical, with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and uses the concept of the rule of law, the concept of state institutions and government institutions, the concept of authority and the concept of good government.

Results/Findings/Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that there are several criteria in determining state losses, if the case is simple, the determination of the value of state losses is carried out by the Prosecutor's Office itself. On the other hand, if the case needs an in-depth audit, the Attorney General's Office will coordinate with the Supreme Audit Agency. The statutory statement does not clearly state the name of the institution that is authorized to declare the value of state losses, so there is uncertainty when determining the institution as the auditor for state losses of BPK/BPKP.

Keywords


Authority; Government Supervision; State Loss


DOI


10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319

Published


2022-05-31

How To Cite


APA: Waelaruno, G.J., Mustamu, J., & Matitaputty, M.I. (2022). Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati. Jurnal Saniri, 2(2), 22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319.
IEEE: G.J. Waelaruno, J. Mustamu, and M.I. Matitaputty, "Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati", J. Saniri, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 22-31, May. 2022. Accessed on: May. 3, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319
Harvard: Waelaruno, G.J., Mustamu, J., and Matitaputty, M.I., (2022). "Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati". Jurnal Saniri, Volume 2(2), pp. 22-31. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319 (Accessed on: 3 May 2025)
Chicago: Waelaruno, Glen Jantje, Julista Mustamu, and Marlien Irene Matitaputty. "Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati." Jurnal Saniri 2, no. 2 (May 31, 2022): 22-31. Accessed May 3, 2025. doi:10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319
Vancouver: Waelaruno GJ, Mustamu J, Matitaputty MI. Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati. J. Saniri [Internet]. 2022 May 31 [cited 2025 May 3];2(2):22-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319
MLA 8th: Waelaruno, Glen Jantje, Julista Mustamu, and Marlien Irene Matitaputty. "Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati." Jurnal Saniri, vol. 2, no. 2, 31 May. 2022, pp. 22-31, doi:10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319. Accessed 3 May. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{saniri1319,
		author = {Glen Waelaruno and Julista Mustamu and Marlien Matitaputty},
		title = {Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa  Jual Beli Tanah Dati},
		journal = {Jurnal Saniri},
		volume = {2},
		number = {2},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Authority; Government Supervision; State Loss},
		abstract = {Introduction: The presence of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration which consists of 89 articles is intended to create an orderly administration of Government Administration, create legal certainty, prevent abuse of authority, ensure the accountability of Government Agencies and/or Officials, provide legal protection to citizens and the apparatus. the government implements the provisions of laws and regulations and applies the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), and provides the best possible service to the citizens. the concept of the rule of law, the concept of state institutions and government institutions, the concept of authority and the concept of good government. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to describe APIP's authority in the PDAM corruption case in Saumlaki and to find out the legal consequences of the abuse of authority by APIP in the PDAM corruption case in Saumlaki.Methods of the Research : This method used is a normative juridical, with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and uses the concept of the rule of law, the concept of state institutions and government institutions, the concept of authority and the concept of good government.Results/Findings/Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that there are several criteria in determining state losses, if the case is simple, the determination of the value of state losses is carried out by the Prosecutor's Office itself. On the other hand, if the case needs an in-depth audit, the Attorney General's Office will coordinate with the Supreme Audit Agency. The statutory statement does not clearly state the name of the institution that is authorized to declare the value of state losses, so there is uncertainty when determining the institution as the auditor for state losses of BPK/BPKP.},
				issn = {2774-1850},		pages = {22--31}			doi = {10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/1319}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Henny Julialni, Penyelesaian Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Negara/Daerah terhadap Pegawai Negeri Bukan Bendahara dan Pejabat Lain,

Hernold Ferry Makawimbang, Kerugian Keuangan Negara,2014,Thafa Media, Yogyakarta

Iman Haryono, 2011 Solusi, Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Perindustrian, Jakarta

Julista Mustamu, (2014) Pertanggungjawaban hukum pemerintah ( kajian tentang ruang lingkup dan hubungan dengan diskresi),,jurnal sasi Vol. 20 No. 2, juli-desember 2014 , hlm. 21

Liberty, 2000 Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesial, Yogyakarta

Marlien I.Matitaputty, (2015) Kebebasann beragama ditinjau dari perspektif hak asasi manusia, Sosiohumaniora, Jurnal Sasi Vol. 21 No. 1,Januari-juni 2015 , hlm. 77

Merry Inggrid Siwy, (2005) Pelalksalnalaln Fungsi Alpalralt Pengalwals Intern Pemerintah (Alpip) Untuk Menunjang Tingkat Kewajaran Laporan Keualngaln Pemerintah Kota Manado, Sosiohumaniora, Vol. 7 No. 3, November, hlm. 4

Misi S. Sallungal, (2015) “Penggunaan Aset Negara/Daerah Secara Pribadi di Luar Fungsi Jabatan Dan Kedinasan”. Jurnal Hukum Legal Opinion.Vol.3 No. 4., hallalmaln 4.

Muyaldi, Jakarta 2002. Auditing, Sallembal Empat,

Peraturan Menteri Negara Pedayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor: Per/05/m.pan/03/2006 Tentang Standar Audit Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 483 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 183 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Peranan Kepala Persekutuan Hukum Adat Sebagai Mediator Di Negeri Hutumuri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Dati
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Glen Jantje Waelaruno; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Julista Mustamu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Marlien Irene Matitaputty; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Authority; Government Supervision; State Loss
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: The presence of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration which consists of 89 articles is intended to create an orderly administration of Government Administration, create legal certainty, prevent abuse of authority, ensure the accountability of Government Agencies and/or Officials, provide legal protection to citizens and the apparatus. the government implements the provisions of laws and regulations and applies the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), and provides the best possible service to the citizens. the concept of the rule of law, the concept of state institutions and government institutions, the concept of authority and the concept of good government. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to describe APIP's authority in the PDAM corruption case in Saumlaki and to find out the legal consequences of the abuse of authority by APIP in the PDAM corruption case in Saumlaki.Methods of the Research : This method used is a normative juridical, with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and uses the concept of the rule of law, the concept of state institutions and government institutions, the concept of authority and the concept of good government.Results/Findings/Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that there are several criteria in determining state losses, if the case is simple, the determination of the value of state losses is carried out by the Prosecutor's Office itself. On the other hand, if the case needs an in-depth audit, the Attorney General's Office will coordinate with the Supreme Audit Agency. The statutory statement does not clearly state the name of the institution that is authorized to declare the value of state losses, so there is uncertainty when determining the institution as the auditor for state losses of BPK/BPKP.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-05-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/1319
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1319
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Jurnal Saniri; Vol 2, No 2 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 2, Mei 2022
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

 

Licence : Jurnal Saniri is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..



Copyright (c) 2023 Glen Jantje Waelaruno, Julista Mustamu, Marlien Irene Matitaputty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.