1. Home
  2. Vol 2, No 2 (2022)
  3. Iftitah

Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan

Wulan Ramadhani Iftitah(1email), Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua(2), Renny Heronia Nendissa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU- XIV/2016 which gives recognition to adherents of a belief, with this decision the state guarantees the fulfillment of its constitutional rights but in its implementation there are still discriminatory actions against adherents of a belief. And it is clearly contrary to Article 29 (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Purposes of the Research: The method used in this paper is met. The method used in this paper is the normative research method. The research method is normative.

Methods of the Research: The method used in this paper is a normative research method.

 

Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: From this writing, it is found that the implementation of constitutional rights to adherents of a belief has not been carried out so well, which still requires regulation, attention, and legal certainty from the government as the executor of state responsibility.


Keywords


Country; Rights; Beliefs


DOI


10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321

Published


2022-05-31

How To Cite


APA: Iftitah, W.R., Nirahua, S.E., & Nendissa, R.H. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan. Jurnal Saniri, 2(2), 47-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321.
IEEE: W.R. Iftitah, S.E. Nirahua, and R.H. Nendissa, "Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan", J. Saniri, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 47-95, May. 2022. Accessed on: May. 3, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321
Harvard: Iftitah, W.R., Nirahua, S.E., and Nendissa, R.H., (2022). "Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan". Jurnal Saniri, Volume 2(2), pp. 47-95. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321 (Accessed on: 3 May 2025)
Chicago: Iftitah, Wulan Ramadhani, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua, and Renny Heronia Nendissa. "Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan." Jurnal Saniri 2, no. 2 (May 31, 2022): 47-95. Accessed May 3, 2025. doi:10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321
Vancouver: Iftitah WR, Nirahua SE, Nendissa RH. Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan. J. Saniri [Internet]. 2022 May 31 [cited 2025 May 3];2(2):47-95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321
MLA 8th: Iftitah, Wulan Ramadhani, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua, and Renny Heronia Nendissa. "Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan." Jurnal Saniri, vol. 2, no. 2, 31 May. 2022, pp. 47-95, doi:10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321. Accessed 3 May. 2025.
BibTeX: 
@article{saniri1321,
		author = {Wulan Iftitah and Salmon Nirahua and Renny Nendissa},
		title = {Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan},
		journal = {Jurnal Saniri},
		volume = {2},
		number = {2},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Country; Rights; Beliefs},
		abstract = {Introduction: Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU- XIV/2016 which gives recognition to adherents of a belief, with this decision the state guarantees the fulfillment of its constitutional rights but in its implementation there are still discriminatory actions against adherents of a belief. And it is clearly contrary to Article 29 (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.Purposes of the Research: The method used in this paper is met. The method used in this paper is the normative research method. The research method is normative.Methods of the Research: The method used in this paper is a normative research method. Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: From this writing, it is found that the implementation of constitutional rights to adherents of a belief has not been carried out so well, which still requires regulation, attention, and legal certainty from the government as the executor of state responsibility.},
				issn = {2774-1850},		pages = {47--95}			doi = {10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/1321}
		}
RefWorks:

   

Jurnal

Hakiki, Kiki Muhammad. “Politik Identitas Agama Lokal, Studi Kasus Agama Lokal.” Jurnal Analisa, 2011.

Hikmah, Mutiara. “Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Penegakan Hukum dan HAM di Indonesia.”

Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 2005.

Jufri, Muwaffiq. “Akibat Hukum Pemisahan Hak Beragama dengan Hak Berkepercayaan dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi, 2019.

Jufri, Muwaffiq. “Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sampang Nomor 69/Pid.B/2012/PN.spg. Presspektif Hak dan Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah, 2016.

Jufri, Muwaffiq. “Nuansa Maqashid Al-Syari'ah dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Istinbath, 2017.

Jufri, Muwaffiq. “Pembatasan terhadap Hak dan Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah, 2016.

Liemanto, Dahlan M dan. “Perlindungan Hukum atas Hak Konstitusional para Penganur Agama-agama Lokal di Indonesia.” Arena Hukum, 2017.

Nendissa, Reny Heronia. “Legalitas Peremponang atau Muhabet sebagai Organisasi Kemasyarakatan.” SASI, 2019.

Simatauw, Vica Jillyan edsti Saija dan Andry. “Religious Education Service for Students of Indigenous Religion of Nualu.” Digital Object Identifier, 2019.

Buku

Anas Saidi, dkk. Menekuk Agama Membangun Tahta : Kebijakan Agama Era Orde Baru.

Jakarta: Desantara, 2004.

Asikin, Amirudin dan Zainal. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Radja Grafindo, 2018. Asshiddique, Jimly. Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta:

Buana Ilmu Populer, 2007.

Darmodiharjo, Darji. Pancasila dalam Beberapa Perspektif. Jakarta: Aries Lima, 1983.

Direktorat Jenderal Nilai Budaya, Seni dan Film. Ensiklopedi Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan yang Maha Esa. Jakarta: Direktorat Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan yang Maha Esa, 2006. Gede, Palguna dan Dewa. Mahkamah Konstitusi : Dasar Pemikiran Kewenangan, Dan

Perbandingan Dengan Negara Lain. Jakarta: Konpress, 2018.

Ibrahim, Johny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia, 2006. Imam, Suwarno. Konsep Tuhan dan Manusia, Mistik dalam Berbagai Kebatinan Jawa.

Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo, 2005.

Ismail, Hasani. Dinamika Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga : Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Mekanisme Nasional Baru Pemajuan dan Perlindungan HAM. Bendungan Hilir: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara, 2013.

Henkin, Louis. Human Rights, New York: Foundation Press, 1999

Kelsen, Hans. Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2009.

Lubis, Todung M. Hak-hak Asasi Manusia dalam Masyarakat Dunia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2005.

Maarif, Samsul. Pasang Surut Rekognisi Agama Leluhur Dalam Politik Agama di Indonesia.

Yogyakarta: CRCS (Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies), 2017.

Martosoewignjo, Sri Soemantri. Prosedur dan Sistem Perubahan Konstitusi. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2006.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum . Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2015.

MD, Moh. Mahfud. Hukum dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Gama Media, 1999. Mulkan, Abdul Munir. Dilema Manusia dengan Diri dan Tuhan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar,

Ranadireksa, Hendarmin. Arsitektur Konstitusi Demokratik. Bandung: Fokusmedia, 2007. Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2001.

Sunyoto, Agus. Atlas Wali Songo: Buku Pertama yang Mengungkap Wali Songo sebagai Fakta Sejarah. Jakarta: Pustaka Iman dan LESBUMI PBNU, 2017.

United Nation. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nation, 2015.

Wachid, Abdurahman. Mengurai Hubungan Agama dan Negara. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka, 1999.

Online/World Wide Web

https://www.kemenkumham.go.id/berita/pemerintah-jamin-perlindungan-kebebasan- beragama

https://www.kompas.id/baca/dikbud/2020/07/22/penghayat-kepercayaan-diakui-tapi-masih- didiskriminasi

https://koran-jakarta.com/kekerasan-atas-nama-agama-terjadi-lagi-rumah-penghayat- kepercayaan-dirusak-warga-di-sulut?page=all

https://news.detik.com/berita/3492198/rekam-jejak-penghayat-kepercayaan-dari-orde-lama- hingga-reformasi

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 923 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 1332 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Hak Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Wulan Ramadhani Iftitah; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Renny Heronia Nendissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Country; Rights; Beliefs
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU- XIV/2016 which gives recognition to adherents of a belief, with this decision the state guarantees the fulfillment of its constitutional rights but in its implementation there are still discriminatory actions against adherents of a belief. And it is clearly contrary to Article 29 (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.Purposes of the Research: The method used in this paper is met. The method used in this paper is the normative research method. The research method is normative.Methods of the Research: The method used in this paper is a normative research method. Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: From this writing, it is found that the implementation of constitutional rights to adherents of a belief has not been carried out so well, which still requires regulation, attention, and legal certainty from the government as the executor of state responsibility.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-05-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/1321
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/saniri.v2i2.1321
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Jurnal Saniri; Vol 2, No 2 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 2, Mei 2022
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

 

Licence : Jurnal Saniri is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..


Copyright (c) 2023 Wulan Ramadhani Iftitah, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua, Renny Heronia Nendissa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.