Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional

Gilbert Marc Baljanan(1email), Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw(2), Yohanes Pattinasarany(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Election administration violations, based on article 460 of the Election Law, Bawaslu has a maximum working time of 14 days to issue recommendations or decisions. Bawaslu's recommendations must be followed up by the KPU by issuing a decision letter no later than 3 days, as explained in Article 462. This problem occurs when the national vote results have been determined, then any dispute that occurs becomes the domain of the Constitutional Court. However, if a violation of election administration is found or reported, it must be followed up and decided by Bawaslu because it is based on article 454 paragraph 6 of the Election Law. The problem discussed by the author is Bawaslu's recommendation to be followed up by the KPU to change the determination of vote acquisition and the legal consequences that will be given if Bawaslu's recommendation is not followed up by the KPU.

This writing uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory regulation approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.

The research results show that regarding the legal force of Bawaslu's recommendation to change the vote tally, Bawaslu certainly has that legal force, because it is not legally prohibited. In connection with the follow-up to Bawaslu's recommendations to the KPU regarding violations of election administration, if the recommendations given by Bawaslu are not followed up by the KPU, they will be faced with various consequences, namely that the KPU can be reported by Bawaslu because it is related to the election organizer's code of ethics.


Keywords


Bawaslu; Administrative Violation; Eelection Results


DOI


10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165

Published


2025-06-09

How To Cite


APA: Baljanan, G.M., Lekipiouw, S.H., & Pattinasarany, Y. (2025). Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional. Jurnal Saniri, 5(2), 56 - 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165.
IEEE: G.M. Baljanan, S.H. Lekipiouw, and Y. Pattinasarany, "Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional", J. Saniri, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 56 - 67, Jun. 2025. Accessed on: Jul. 6, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165
Harvard: Baljanan, G.M., Lekipiouw, S.H., and Pattinasarany, Y., (2025). "Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional". Jurnal Saniri, Volume 5(2), pp. 56 - 67. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165 (Accessed on: 6 July 2025)
Chicago: Baljanan, Gilbert Marc, Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw, and Yohanes Pattinasarany. "Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional." Jurnal Saniri 5, no. 2 (June 9, 2025): 56 - 67. Accessed July 6, 2025. doi:10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165
Vancouver: Baljanan GM, Lekipiouw SH, Pattinasarany Y. Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional. J. Saniri [Internet]. 2025 Jun 9 [cited 2025 Jul 6];5(2):56 - 67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165
MLA 8th: Baljanan, Gilbert Marc, Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw, and Yohanes Pattinasarany. "Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional." Jurnal Saniri, vol. 5, no. 2, 9 Jun. 2025, pp. 56 - 67, doi:10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165. Accessed 6 Jul. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{saniri3165,
		author = {Gilbert Baljanan and Sherlock Lekipiouw and Yohanes Pattinasarany},
		title = {Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional},
		journal = {Jurnal Saniri},
		volume = {5},
		number = {2},
		year = {2025},
		keywords = {Bawaslu; Administrative Violation; Eelection Results},
		abstract = {Election administration violations, based on article 460 of the Election Law, Bawaslu has a maximum working time of 14 days to issue recommendations or decisions. Bawaslu's recommendations must be followed up by the KPU by issuing a decision letter no later than 3 days, as explained in Article 462. This problem occurs when the national vote results have been determined, then any dispute that occurs becomes the domain of the Constitutional Court. However, if a violation of election administration is found or reported, it must be followed up and decided by Bawaslu because it is based on article 454 paragraph 6 of the Election Law. The problem discussed by the author is Bawaslu's recommendation to be followed up by the KPU to change the determination of vote acquisition and the legal consequences that will be given if Bawaslu's recommendation is not followed up by the KPU.This writing uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory regulation approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.The research results show that regarding the legal force of Bawaslu's recommendation to change the vote tally, Bawaslu certainly has that legal force, because it is not legally prohibited. In connection with the follow-up to Bawaslu's recommendations to the KPU regarding violations of election administration, if the recommendations given by Bawaslu are not followed up by the KPU, they will be faced with various consequences, namely that the KPU can be reported by Bawaslu because it is related to the election organizer's code of ethics.},
				issn = {2774-1850},		pages = {56--67}			doi = {10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/3165}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Abdul Rasyid Thalib (2021). Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,

Asshiddiqie, J (2013). Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu. PT Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta,

Asshiddiqie, J (2016). Penguatan Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Ayoub, A., & Ellis, A (2010). Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook, Internasional IDEA, Swedia.

Bawaslu RI. Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu, Bawaslu RI, Jakarta, 2020.

Edgar Bodenheimer. Treatise on Justice, New York: Philosophical Library Inc.New York.

Khairul Fahmi. Ratna Dwi Pettalolo. Kajian Evaluatif Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilu, Bawaslu RI, Jakarta,2020.

Lekipiouw, SH. Konstruksi Penataan Daerah Dan Model Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Sasi Vol. 26 No. 4, Ambon, 2020.

Peter Mahfud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2017.

Sofyan, A., Fahruroji. Konsep Memperdalam Demokrasi, Instrans Publishing, Malang, 2016.

Surbakti, Ramlan. Efektivitas Pemerintahan Demokrasi Presidensial. Prisma35, Jakarta, 2016.

Teguh Prasetyo.S, Penetapan Hasil, Pemilu Lanjutan, Pemantauan, dan Pendanaan Pemilu. Nusamedia, Jakarta, 2021.

Y Pattinasarany, Keabsahan Surat Edaran Yang Muatan Materinya Bersifat Pengaturan dan Sanksi. Jurnal Saniri Vol. 3 No. 1, Ambon, 2022.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 66 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 68 times



 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Gilbert Marc Baljanan; Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw; Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Yohanes Pattinasarany; Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Bawaslu; Administrative Violation; Eelection Results
 
4. Description Abstract Election administration violations, based on article 460 of the Election Law, Bawaslu has a maximum working time of 14 days to issue recommendations or decisions. Bawaslu's recommendations must be followed up by the KPU by issuing a decision letter no later than 3 days, as explained in Article 462. This problem occurs when the national vote results have been determined, then any dispute that occurs becomes the domain of the Constitutional Court. However, if a violation of election administration is found or reported, it must be followed up and decided by Bawaslu because it is based on article 454 paragraph 6 of the Election Law. The problem discussed by the author is Bawaslu's recommendation to be followed up by the KPU to change the determination of vote acquisition and the legal consequences that will be given if Bawaslu's recommendation is not followed up by the KPU.This writing uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory regulation approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.The research results show that regarding the legal force of Bawaslu's recommendation to change the vote tally, Bawaslu certainly has that legal force, because it is not legally prohibited. In connection with the follow-up to Bawaslu's recommendations to the KPU regarding violations of election administration, if the recommendations given by Bawaslu are not followed up by the KPU, they will be faced with various consequences, namely that the KPU can be reported by Bawaslu because it is related to the election organizer's code of ethics.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s) Universitas Pattimura
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-06-09
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/3165
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3165
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Jurnal Saniri; Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 2, Mei 2025
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

 

Licence : Jurnal Saniri is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..



Copyright (c) 2025 Gilbert Marc Baljanan, Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw, Yohanes Pattinasarany

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.