Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang

Grisko Vinno Pattipeilohy(1email), Revency Vania Rugebregt(2), Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Based on its authority, General Election Supervisory Body's (BAWASLU) has issued recommendations for implementing re-voting at several polling stations in the February 14 2024 elections in Ambon City. In reality, the General Election Commission (KPU) as the organizer of the General Election did not implement these recommendations. The legal problem is the legal strength of the BAWASLU recommendations so that they are not executed by KPU.

The method used in this research is normative juridical, with a model approach, legislation and conceptual approach, which is supported by several empirical approaches as supporting legal materials needed.

Based on its authority BAWASLU is obliged to issue recommendations regarding the Re-Voting; that the legal consequence of not implementing the BAWASLU Recommendation is that the Recommendation is disqualified, and the KPU is referred to the Honorary Council, or to obtain justice the matter is followed up with legal action in court

Keywords


Legal Strength; Recommendations; Re-Voting


DOI


10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167

Published


2025-06-09

How To Cite


APA: Pattipeilohy, G.V., Rugebregt, R.V., & Tita, H.M. (2025). Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang. Jurnal Saniri, 5(2), 78 - 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167.
IEEE: G.V. Pattipeilohy, R.V. Rugebregt, and H.M. Tita, "Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang", J. Saniri, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 78 - 85, Jun. 2025. Accessed on: Jun. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167
Harvard: Pattipeilohy, G.V., Rugebregt, R.V., and Tita, H.M., (2025). "Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang". Jurnal Saniri, Volume 5(2), pp. 78 - 85. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167 (Accessed on: 15 June 2025)
Chicago: Pattipeilohy, Grisko Vinno, Revency Vania Rugebregt, and Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita. "Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang." Jurnal Saniri 5, no. 2 (June 9, 2025): 78 - 85. Accessed June 15, 2025. doi:10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167
Vancouver: Pattipeilohy GV, Rugebregt RV, Tita HM. Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang. J. Saniri [Internet]. 2025 Jun 9 [cited 2025 Jun 15];5(2):78 - 85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167
MLA 8th: Pattipeilohy, Grisko Vinno, Revency Vania Rugebregt, and Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita. "Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang." Jurnal Saniri, vol. 5, no. 2, 9 Jun. 2025, pp. 78 - 85, doi:10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167. Accessed 15 Jun. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{saniri3167,
		author = {Grisko Pattipeilohy and Revency Rugebregt and Heillen Tita},
		title = {Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang},
		journal = {Jurnal Saniri},
		volume = {5},
		number = {2},
		year = {2025},
		keywords = {Legal Strength; Recommendations; Re-Voting},
		abstract = {Based on its authority, General Election Supervisory Body's (BAWASLU) has issued recommendations for implementing re-voting at several polling stations in the February 14 2024 elections in Ambon City. In reality, the General Election Commission (KPU) as the organizer of the General Election did not implement these recommendations. The legal problem is the legal strength of the BAWASLU recommendations so that they are not executed by KPU.The method used in this research is normative juridical, with a model approach, legislation and conceptual approach, which is supported by several empirical approaches as supporting legal materials needed.Based on its authority BAWASLU is obliged to issue recommendations regarding the Re-Voting; that the legal consequence of not implementing the BAWASLU Recommendation is that the Recommendation is disqualified, and the KPU is referred to the Honorary Council, or to obtain justice the matter is followed up with legal action in court},
				issn = {2774-1850},		pages = {78--85}			doi = {10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/3167}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Anindyajati, T., (2023), Polemik Tindak Lanjut Rekomendasi BAWASLU Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, Volume 6 Nomor 1;

Endah, K. (2018). Etika Pemerintahan dalam Pelayanan Publik, Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, Volume 4 Nomor 1;

Feri Amsari dkk., (2024), Laporan Hasil Riset 2021, Konstitusionalitas dan Kerangka Hukum Penyelenggaraan PEMILU dan Pemilihan Serentak Tahun 2024, Kerjasama Pusat Pelatihan, Penelitian, dan pengembangan Sekretariat Jenderal KPU-RI Pusat Studi Konstitusi (PUSaKO), Medan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas;

Gifari Juniatama (Penulis dan Peneliti Independen), (2023), Menyegarkan Istilah Pesta Demokrasi, Balai Bahasa Provinsi Riau, Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, 04-09-2023;

Hamdan Kurniawan, (Anggota KPU DIY Periode 2018-2023), (2023), Pemungutan Suara Ulang : Menyoal Batas Waktu dan Faktor Penyebab; Yogyakarta;

John Pemberton (1986), Pemberton adalah seorang sarjana Amerika yang dengan bersungguh-sungguh meneliti PEMILU 1982 secara harafiah sebagai pentas atau sebuah 'pesta;

Organization of American States (2019). Observing Electoral Justice Systems: A Manual for OAS Electoral Observation Missions. Washington, D.C.: OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 25 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 15 times



 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Kekuatan Hukum Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Tentang Pemungutan Suara Ulang
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Grisko Vinno Pattipeilohy; Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Revency Vania Rugebregt; Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita; Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Legal Strength; Recommendations; Re-Voting
 
4. Description Abstract Based on its authority, General Election Supervisory Body's (BAWASLU) has issued recommendations for implementing re-voting at several polling stations in the February 14 2024 elections in Ambon City. In reality, the General Election Commission (KPU) as the organizer of the General Election did not implement these recommendations. The legal problem is the legal strength of the BAWASLU recommendations so that they are not executed by KPU.The method used in this research is normative juridical, with a model approach, legislation and conceptual approach, which is supported by several empirical approaches as supporting legal materials needed.Based on its authority BAWASLU is obliged to issue recommendations regarding the Re-Voting; that the legal consequence of not implementing the BAWASLU Recommendation is that the Recommendation is disqualified, and the KPU is referred to the Honorary Council, or to obtain justice the matter is followed up with legal action in court
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s) Universitas Pattimura
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-06-09
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/3167
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/saniri.v5i2.3167
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Jurnal Saniri; Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 2, Mei 2025
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

 

Licence : Jurnal Saniri is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..



Copyright (c) 2025 Grisko Vinno Pattipeilohy, Revency Vania Rugebregt, Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.