PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH  PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA

Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae

PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA

Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae⁽¹⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

The weak implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions is due to the absence of an executive institution and force to force in the implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions, so that the implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions depends on the awareness and initiative of the State Administration Officer. Article 116 paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court, namely the imposition of sanctions for State Administration Officers who do not implement a decision that has the power permanent law in the form of forced payment of money (dwangsom) and/or administrative sanctions and publication in print media. Article 116 paragraph (6) concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court, besides the efforts stipulated in the previous law, also regulates reporting of disobedience of the State Administration Officer to implement the decision of the Administrative Court The country said to the President as the holder of the highest governmental authority and to the people's representative institutions to carry out the oversight function.

Keywords

Decision on state administration; Executive Power

How To Cite

APA: Pattipawae, D.R. (2020). PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA. Jurnal Saniri, 1(1), 1-17. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/432/0

IEEE: D.R. Pattipawae, "PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA", J. Saniri, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-17, Nov. 2020. Accessed on: Dec. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available at: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/432/0

Harvard: Pattipawae, D.R., (2020). "PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA". Jurnal Saniri, Volume 1(1), pp. 1-17. [Online]. Available at: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/432/0 (Accessed on: 22 December 2024)

Chicago: Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana. "PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA." Jurnal Saniri 1, no. 1 (November 22, 2020): 1-17. Accessed December 22, 2024. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/432/0

Vancouver: Pattipawae DR. PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA. J. Saniri [Internet]. 2020 Nov 22 [cited 2024 Dec 22];1(1):1-17. Available from: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/432/0

MLA 8th: Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana. "PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA." Jurnal Saniri, vol. 1, no. 1, 22 Nov. 2020, pp. 1-17, https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/432/0. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{saniri432,
		author = {Dezonda Pattipawae},
		title = {PUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MEMILIKI KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL TIDAK DIPATUHI OLEH  PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA},
		journal = {Jurnal Saniri},
		volume = {1},
		number = {1},
		year = {2020},
		keywords = {Decision on state administration; Executive Power},
		abstract = {The weak implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions is due to the absence of an executive institution and force to force in the implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions, so that the implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions depends on the awareness and initiative of the State Administration Officer. Article 116 paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court, namely the imposition of sanctions for State Administration Officers who do not implement a decision that has the power permanent law in the form of forced payment of money (dwangsom) and/or administrative sanctions and publication in print media. Article 116 paragraph (6) concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court, besides the efforts stipulated in the previous law, also regulates reporting of disobedience of the State Administration Officer to implement the decision of the Administrative Court The country said to the President as the holder of the highest governmental authority and to the people's representative institutions to carry out the oversight function.},
				issn = {2774-1850},		pages = {1--17}				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/saniri/article/view/432}
		}

RefWorks: