Problems of Justice in Legal Protection Efforts against Banks as Separatist Creditors related to Execution of Collateral Tied with Mortgage Rights on Bankrupt Debtor's Assets
), Joni Emirzon(2), Annalisa Yahanan(3)
(1) Faculty of Law Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The rights of banks as separatist creditors in the UU-KPKPU cannot be implemented. Banks also often get a share that is not under the amount of debtor debt, causing injustice.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the forms of justice problems in legal protection efforts against banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of bankrupt debtors and their solutions.
Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research. Research materials were used, namely secondary data and primary data as a support. This research material was collected by document study and interviews. The material that has been collected is then processed and analyzed using a qualitative approach, which is then drawn to conclusions using the deductive method.
Results of the Research: There are two forms of the problem of justice in the legal protection of banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of the bankrupt debtor. First, the neglect of bank rights as separatist creditors by UU-KPKPU can be seen in the provisions of Article 56 paragraph (1) and 59 paragraph (1) which contradicts Article 55 paragraph (1). Second, banks as separatist creditors often get a share that is not under the amount of debt of the bankrupt debtor. The author suggests that the UU-KPKPU be changed based on distributive justice which requires proportional distribution.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1028
Published
2022-10-13
How To Cite
@article{SASI1028,
author = {Ilham Soetansah and Joni Emirzon and Annalisa Yahanan},
title = {Problems of Justice in Legal Protection Efforts against Banks as Separatist Creditors related to Execution of Collateral Tied with Mortgage Rights on Bankrupt Debtor's Assets},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {28},
number = {3},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Justice Problems; Legal Protection; Banks; Collateral Execution; Bankrupt Debtors},
abstract = {Introduction: The rights of banks as separatist creditors in the UU-KPKPU cannot be implemented. Banks also often get a share that is not under the amount of debtor debt, causing injustice.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the forms of justice problems in legal protection efforts against banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of bankrupt debtors and their solutions.Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research. Research materials were used, namely secondary data and primary data as a support. This research material was collected by document study and interviews. The material that has been collected is then processed and analyzed using a qualitative approach, which is then drawn to conclusions using the deductive method.Results of the Research: There are two forms of the problem of justice in the legal protection of banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of the bankrupt debtor. First, the neglect of bank rights as separatist creditors by UU-KPKPU can be seen in the provisions of Article 56 paragraph (1) and 59 paragraph (1) which contradicts Article 55 paragraph (1). Second, banks as separatist creditors often get a share that is not under the amount of debt of the bankrupt debtor. The author suggests that the UU-KPKPU be changed based on distributive justice which requires proportional distribution.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {470--481} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1028},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1028}
}
Journal Article
Aprita, Serlika dan Rio Aditya. “Penerapan ‘Asas Keadilan’ Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitor.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti 3, no. 1 (2019): 46–56.
Ari Murti Susanto, Erwin Malonda, Imron Rosadi, Muhammad Rizki. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Bank Atas Upaya PKPU (Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang) Dari Pihak Ke 3 (Tiga).” Justitia Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2019).
Claudi, Udin Silalahi dan. “Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Atas Hak Jaminan Dalam Proses Kepailitan.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 1 (2020): Halaman 35-47.
Dwisnar, Inge. “Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 3 (2018).
Ikhwansyah Isis dan Lambok Marisi Jakobus Sidabutar. “The Implementation of Insolvency Tes on Debtr’ Bankrupcty in Performing the Principle of Justice.” Media Hukum 26, no. 2 (2019).
Nasution, Bahder Johan. “Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern.” Yustisia 3, no. 2 (2014).
Natalia, Titie Syahnaz. “Akibat Hukum Kepailitan Terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan.” Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Sriwijaya 16, no. 3 (2018).
Nola, Luthvi Febryka. “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Secara Terpadu Bagi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (TKI).” Negara Hukum 7, no. 1 (2016).
Nurjanah, St. “Eksistensi Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Lembaga Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah (Tinjauan Filosofis).” Jurisprudentie 5, no. 1 (2018).
Prasojo, Emil Cahyo dan Gransham Anand. “Akibat Hukum Kreditor Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Terhadap Obyek Hak Tanggungan Yang Dinyatakan Gugur Demi Hukum Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan.” Jurnal Selat 5, no. 2 (2013).
Widyanti, Akira. “Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Oleh Kreditor Terhadap Jaminan Sebagai Sarana Pelunasan Hutang Debitor Berdasarkan Pasal 6 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan.” Rechtsregel Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2020).
Book
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2003.
Anton, Suyatno. Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Tanpa Proses Gugatan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2016.
Apeldoorn, L.J. Van. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 2001.
Janisriwati, Sylvia. Kepailtan Bank: Aspek Hukum Kewenangan Bank Indonesia Dalam Kepailitan Suatu Bank. Bandung: LoGoz Publishing, 2011.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nuansa Media, 2015.
Raws, John. Teori Keadilan (Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Politik Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial Dalam Negara), Diterjemahkan Oleh Uzair Fauzan Dan Heru Prasetyo. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.
Sjahdeni, Sutan Remy. Hukum Kepailitan : Memahami Faillisements Verordening Jo. Undang- Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998. Jakarta: Pustaka Grafiti, 2002.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif:Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Subagyo, Dwi Tatak. Hukum Jaminan Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Pengantar). Surabaya: UWKS Press, 2018.
Tridianto, Yoachim Agus. Keadilan Restoratif. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2019.
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Hukumonline.com. “Hakim Perintahkan Kreditor Separatis Berbagi Hak Dengan Buruh,” n.d. http://www.hukumonline.com/baca/lt4bal1d3b8804/hakim-perintahkan-kreditor-separatis-berbagi-hak-dengan-buruh.
Laoly, Yasonna H. “Kesadaran Hukum Dan Terwujudnya Keadilan Bagi Seluruh Rakyat Indonesia, Meteri Kuliah Umum Menkumhan,” n.d. https://www.unuja.ac.id/unduh/10/Materi Kuliah Umum Menkumham.pdf
Ramiyanto. “Reformulasi Aturan Tentang Pengajuan Permintaan Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perakra Pidana Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Suatu Aturan Yang Berbasis Pada Nilai Keadilan Pancasila.” Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2020.
: 1040 times
Download : 1024 times
Copyright (c) 2022 Ilham Soetansah, Joni Emirzon, Annalisa Yahanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
