Compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s Form of Government Against Article 18B Section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
)
(1) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Law, Illinois, United States
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: With the promulgation of Law Number 3 of 2022 on State Capital, the government realized its plan to relocate the nation’s capital from the Specific Capital Region of Jakarta to the Capital of Nusantara on the Kalimantan Island. However, the law's passage has sparked a debate directed at the Indonesian new capital's form of government which is deemed to violate the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, specifically Articles 18, 18A, and 18B.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government against Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Methods of the Research: This is a normative juridical study using primary and secondary legal materials that are relevant to the topic of this study.
Results of the Research: The results showed that the specific arrangements of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government are normatively compatible with Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia for two reasons, namely: the position between Article 18B section (1) and Article 18 as equals and that both of them apply independently; and the specificity that can be regulated for the Capital of Nusantara is flexible which means that the extent of the specificities can be so broad, including in terms of the form of government.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1029
Published
2022-10-13
How To Cite
@article{SASI1029,
author = {Bimo Hantoro},
title = {Compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s Form of Government Against Article 18B Section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {28},
number = {3},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Capital of Nusantara; Form of Government; Article 18B Section (1); 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia},
abstract = {Introduction: With the promulgation of Law Number 3 of 2022 on State Capital, the government realized its plan to relocate the nation’s capital from the Specific Capital Region of Jakarta to the Capital of Nusantara on the Kalimantan Island. However, the law's passage has sparked a debate directed at the Indonesian new capital's form of government which is deemed to violate the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, specifically Articles 18, 18A, and 18B.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government against Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.Methods of the Research: This is a normative juridical study using primary and secondary legal materials that are relevant to the topic of this study.Results of the Research: The results showed that the specific arrangements of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government are normatively compatible with Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia for two reasons, namely: the position between Article 18B section (1) and Article 18 as equals and that both of them apply independently; and the specificity that can be regulated for the Capital of Nusantara is flexible which means that the extent of the specificities can be so broad, including in terms of the form of government.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {411--431} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1029},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1029}
}
Journal Article
Alivia, Dianora. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Pemerintahan Daerah Yang Bersifat Khusus Atau Bersifat Istimewa Di Indonesia.” RechtIdee 14, no. 2 (2019): 150–66.
Gaffar, Janedjri M. “Peran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Terkait Penyelenggaraan Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 1 (2013): 1–31.
Hadi, Fikri, and Rosa Ristawati. “Pemindahan Ibu Kota Indonesia Dan Kekuasaan Presiden Dalam Perspektif Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 3 (2020): 530–57.
Herdiana, Dian. “Menemukenali Syarat Keberhasilan Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara.” Politica 11, no. 1 (2020): 1–18.
———. “Pemindahan Ibukota Negara: Upaya Pemerataan Pembangunan Ataukah Mewujudkan Tata Pemerintahan Yang Baik.” Jurnal Transformative 8, no. 1 (2022): 1–30.
utasoit, Wesley Liano. “Analisa Pemindahan Ibukota Negara.” Dedikasi 19, no. 2 (2018): 108–28.
Mauleny, Ariesy Tri. “Aglomerasi, Perubahan Sosial Ekonomi, Dan Kebijakan Pembangunan Jakarta.” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik 6, no. 2 (2015): 147–62.
Mukhlis. “Keistimewaan Dan Kekhususan Aceh Dalam Perspektif Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2013): 76–99.
Rohim, Nur. “Optimalisasi Otonomi Khusus Papua Dalam Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Guna Meredam Konflik Dan Kekerasan.” Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2014): 80–100.
Sa’adah, Nabiatus. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review.” Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (2019): 235–47.
Suharyo. “Otonomi Khusus Di Aceh Dan Papua Di Tengah Fenomena Korupsi, Suatu Strategi Penindakan Hukum.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 3 (2018): 305–18.
Triningsih, Anna, and Oly Viana Agustine. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Memuat Keadilan Sosial Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 4 (2019): 834–60.
Book
Huda, Ni’matul. Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam NKRI. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2017.
Raharusun, Yohanis Anton. Daerah Khusus Dalam Perspektif NKRI. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2009.
Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2008.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press, 2006.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Umum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.
Tim Penyusun Naskah Komprehensif Proses dan Hasil Perubahan UUD 1945. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, Dan Hasil Pembahasan, 1999-2002 Buku IV Kekuasaan Pemerintahan Negara Jilid 2. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Bisariyadi, Intan Permata Putri, Ananthia Ayu Devitasari, Titis Anindyajati, Alia Harumdani Widjaja, Mohammad Mahrus Ali, and Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito. Penafsiran Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2016.
Hidayat, Rofik. “Pengaturan Sistem Otorita Dalam UU IKN Dinilai Langgar Konstitusi.” HukumOnline.com, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pengaturan-sistem-otorita-dalam-uu-ikn-dinilai-langgar-konstitusi-lt61e92c59b51e0/
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Ibu Kota Negara. Jakarta: Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, 2020.
Saputro, Febrianto Adi. “Ibu Kota Baru Diharapkan Jadi Motor Kemajuan Indonesia.” Republika, 2021. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/r0741d328/ibu-kota-baru-diharapkan-jadi-motor-kemajuan-indonesia.
Sucipto. “Bentuk Badan Otorita IKN Nusantara Dinilai Rancu.” Kompas, 2022. https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2022/02/15/bentuk-badan-otorita-ikn-nusantara-dinilai-rancu.
: 1162 times
Download : 485 times
Copyright (c) 2022 Bimo Fajar Hantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
