The Ultimate Remedium Principle in the Strategy of Returning and Recovering Corruption Crimes
(1) Faculty of Social and Law Quality University, Medan, Indonesia
(2) Kejaksaan Negeri Tanjung Balai, Tanjung Balai, Indonesia
(3) Kejaksaan Negeri Belawan, Belawan, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The problem of corruption is not new in a country. So that the application of the ultimum remedium principle in corruption crimes provides a deterrent effect for the perpetrators to recover assets from state losses. The ultimum remedium principle places criminal law as a last resort in realizing legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine the principle of criminal law as a last resort (Ultimate Remedium) as an Effort in the Eradication of Corruption and how effective the ultimum remedium principle is in eradicating corruption.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative research. Normative or doctrinal legal research is a legal research that puts the law as a building system of norms. The technique of data collection is done by literature study.
Results of the Research: The study results show that the ultimum remedium principle is very effective if the punishment given to the perpetrators of corruption is in the form of hefty penalties to provide a deterrent effect and provide an example for the community not to do so. This study concludes that the ultimum remedium principle is the last step in achieving legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits. So that an integral criminal justice system is carried out with a systemic approach with related policy arrangements in the field of structuring legal substance, legal structures or institutions, and legal culture.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1039
Published
2022-12-30
How To Cite
@article{SASI1039, author = {Aras Firdaus and Renhard Harve and Bona Simbolon}, title = {The Ultimate Remedium Principle in the Strategy of Returning and Recovering Corruption Crimes}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {28}, number = {4}, year = {2022}, keywords = {Criminal law; Ultimate Remedium; Corruption}, abstract = {Introduction: The problem of corruption is not new in a country. So that the application of the ultimum remedium principle in corruption crimes provides a deterrent effect for the perpetrators to recover assets from state losses. The ultimum remedium principle places criminal law as a last resort in realizing legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine the principle of criminal law as a last resort (Ultimate Remedium) as an Effort in the Eradication of Corruption and how effective the ultimum remedium principle is in eradicating corruption.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative research. Normative or doctrinal legal research is a legal research that puts the law as a building system of norms. The technique of data collection is done by literature study.Results of the Research: The study results show that the ultimum remedium principle is very effective if the punishment given to the perpetrators of corruption is in the form of hefty penalties to provide a deterrent effect and provide an example for the community not to do so. This study concludes that the ultimum remedium principle is the last step in achieving legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits. So that an integral criminal justice system is carried out with a systemic approach with related policy arrangements in the field of structuring legal substance, legal structures or institutions, and legal culture.}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {544--552} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1039}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1039} }
Journal Article
Anindyajati, Titis, Irfan Nur Rachman, and Anak Agung Dian Onita. 2016. “Konstitusionalitas Norma Sanksi Pidana Sebagai Ultimum Remedium Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12 (4): 872. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12410.
Bunga, Marten. 2020. “Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Encephale 15 (1): 1–30.
Firdaus, A, Suhaidi, Sunarmi, and Jelly Leviza. 2020. “Environmental Criminal Responsibility for Mining Corporation Through the Ultimum Remedium Principle” 413 (Icolgis 2019): 48–50. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.179.
Firdaus, Rudy Hendra Prapahan & Aras. 2019. “Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum” 12 (3): 369–78.
Fitri, Sheila Maulida. 2020. “Eksistensi Penerapan Ultimum Remedium Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” De Jure 2 (3): 16–27.
Halimang. 2020. PENDIDIKAN ANTI-KORUPSI PENDEKATAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Edited by Asnawan. Yogyakarta: BILDUNG.
Irmawanti, Noveria Devy, and Barda Nawawi Arief. 2021. “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3 (2): 220.
Maerani, Ira Alia. 2015. “Implementasi Ide Keseimbangan Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Pancasila.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 11 (2): 329–38.
Nugroho, Nunung. 2017. “URGENSI PEMBARUAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA DALAM DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT INDONESIA.” Jurnal Spektrum Hukum 14 (1): 44–70.
Pratama, Mochamad Ramdhan, and Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah. 2020. “Penerapan Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Tindak Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 4 (2): 240. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v4i2.350.
Puspita, Shintiy. 2014. “Tanggungjawabhukum Dalam Konteks Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Arena Hukum 7 (3): 431–57. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00703.7.
Saputra, Roni. 2018. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Spektrum Hukum 15 (1): 44. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v15i1.1109.
Sibuea, Haris Yonatan Parmahan. 2014. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Legislatif Negara.” Info Singkat Hukum 6 (18): 2.
Simanjuntak, Supriardoyo, and Kornelius Benuf. 2020. “Relevansi Nilai Ketuhanan Dan Nilai Kemanusiaan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum 6 (1): 22. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v6i1.890.
Book
Amiruddin, and Zainal Asikin. 2016. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cet. IX. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. 2015. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Cet. III. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Halimang. 2020. Pendidikan Anti-Korupsi Pendekatan Hukum Di Indonesia. Edited by Asnawan. Yogyakarta: BILDUNG.
Pangabean, Mompang L. 2005. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 2003. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Bandung: Eresco.
Sedarmayanti. 2012. Good Governance (Kepemerintahan Yang Baik) : Membangun Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Guna Meningkatkan Produktivitas Menuju Good Governance (Kepemerintahan Yang Baik). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Sudjana, Eggi. 2008. Republik Tanpa KPK Koruptor Harus Mati. Jakarta: JP Books.
Syari, Fakultas. 2019. “Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia” 6 (2): 33–54.
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Javier, Faisal. 2021. “ICW: Angka Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Semester 1 2021 Naik Jika Dibandingkan Tahun Sebelumnya.” Tempo, September 2021.
Copyright (c) 2022 Aras Firdaus, Renhard Harve, Bona Fernandez Martogitua Simbolon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.