The Ultimate Remedium Principle in the Strategy of Returning and Recovering Corruption Crimes
), Renhard Harve(2), Bona Fernandez Martogitua Simbolon(3)
(1) Faculty of Social and Law Quality University, Medan, Indonesia
(2) Kejaksaan Negeri Tanjung Balai, Tanjung Balai, Indonesia
(3) Kejaksaan Negeri Belawan, Belawan, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The problem of corruption is not new in a country. So that the application of the ultimum remedium principle in corruption crimes provides a deterrent effect for the perpetrators to recover assets from state losses. The ultimum remedium principle places criminal law as a last resort in realizing legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine the principle of criminal law as a last resort (Ultimate Remedium) as an Effort in the Eradication of Corruption and how effective the ultimum remedium principle is in eradicating corruption.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative research. Normative or doctrinal legal research is a legal research that puts the law as a building system of norms. The technique of data collection is done by literature study.
Results of the Research: The study results show that the ultimum remedium principle is very effective if the punishment given to the perpetrators of corruption is in the form of hefty penalties to provide a deterrent effect and provide an example for the community not to do so. This study concludes that the ultimum remedium principle is the last step in achieving legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits. So that an integral criminal justice system is carried out with a systemic approach with related policy arrangements in the field of structuring legal substance, legal structures or institutions, and legal culture.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1039
Published
2022-12-30
How To Cite
@article{SASI1039,
author = {Aras Firdaus and Renhard Harve and Bona Simbolon},
title = {The Ultimate Remedium Principle in the Strategy of Returning and Recovering Corruption Crimes},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {28},
number = {4},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Criminal law; Ultimate Remedium; Corruption},
abstract = {Introduction: The problem of corruption is not new in a country. So that the application of the ultimum remedium principle in corruption crimes provides a deterrent effect for the perpetrators to recover assets from state losses. The ultimum remedium principle places criminal law as a last resort in realizing legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine the principle of criminal law as a last resort (Ultimate Remedium) as an Effort in the Eradication of Corruption and how effective the ultimum remedium principle is in eradicating corruption.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative research. Normative or doctrinal legal research is a legal research that puts the law as a building system of norms. The technique of data collection is done by literature study.Results of the Research: The study results show that the ultimum remedium principle is very effective if the punishment given to the perpetrators of corruption is in the form of hefty penalties to provide a deterrent effect and provide an example for the community not to do so. This study concludes that the ultimum remedium principle is the last step in achieving legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits. So that an integral criminal justice system is carried out with a systemic approach with related policy arrangements in the field of structuring legal substance, legal structures or institutions, and legal culture.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {544--552} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1039},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1039}
}
Journal Article
Anindyajati, Titis, Irfan Nur Rachman, and Anak Agung Dian Onita. 2016. “Konstitusionalitas Norma Sanksi Pidana Sebagai Ultimum Remedium Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12 (4): 872. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12410.
Bunga, Marten. 2020. “Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Encephale 15 (1): 1–30.
Firdaus, A, Suhaidi, Sunarmi, and Jelly Leviza. 2020. “Environmental Criminal Responsibility for Mining Corporation Through the Ultimum Remedium Principle” 413 (Icolgis 2019): 48–50. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.179.
Firdaus, Rudy Hendra Prapahan & Aras. 2019. “Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum” 12 (3): 369–78.
Fitri, Sheila Maulida. 2020. “Eksistensi Penerapan Ultimum Remedium Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” De Jure 2 (3): 16–27.
Halimang. 2020. PENDIDIKAN ANTI-KORUPSI PENDEKATAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Edited by Asnawan. Yogyakarta: BILDUNG.
Irmawanti, Noveria Devy, and Barda Nawawi Arief. 2021. “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3 (2): 220.
Maerani, Ira Alia. 2015. “Implementasi Ide Keseimbangan Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Pancasila.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 11 (2): 329–38.
Nugroho, Nunung. 2017. “URGENSI PEMBARUAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA DALAM DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT INDONESIA.” Jurnal Spektrum Hukum 14 (1): 44–70.
Pratama, Mochamad Ramdhan, and Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah. 2020. “Penerapan Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Tindak Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 4 (2): 240. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v4i2.350.
Puspita, Shintiy. 2014. “Tanggungjawabhukum Dalam Konteks Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Arena Hukum 7 (3): 431–57. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00703.7.
Saputra, Roni. 2018. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Spektrum Hukum 15 (1): 44. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v15i1.1109.
Sibuea, Haris Yonatan Parmahan. 2014. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Legislatif Negara.” Info Singkat Hukum 6 (18): 2.
Simanjuntak, Supriardoyo, and Kornelius Benuf. 2020. “Relevansi Nilai Ketuhanan Dan Nilai Kemanusiaan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum 6 (1): 22. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v6i1.890.
Book
Amiruddin, and Zainal Asikin. 2016. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cet. IX. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. 2015. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Cet. III. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Halimang. 2020. Pendidikan Anti-Korupsi Pendekatan Hukum Di Indonesia. Edited by Asnawan. Yogyakarta: BILDUNG.
Pangabean, Mompang L. 2005. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 2003. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Bandung: Eresco.
Sedarmayanti. 2012. Good Governance (Kepemerintahan Yang Baik) : Membangun Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Guna Meningkatkan Produktivitas Menuju Good Governance (Kepemerintahan Yang Baik). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Sudjana, Eggi. 2008. Republik Tanpa KPK Koruptor Harus Mati. Jakarta: JP Books.
Syari, Fakultas. 2019. “Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia” 6 (2): 33–54.
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Javier, Faisal. 2021. “ICW: Angka Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Semester 1 2021 Naik Jika Dibandingkan Tahun Sebelumnya.” Tempo, September 2021.
: 1090 times
Download : 546 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | The Ultimate Remedium Principle in the Strategy of Returning and Recovering Corruption Crimes |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Aras Firdaus; Faculty of Social and Law Quality University, Medan; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Renhard Harve; Kejaksaan Negeri Tanjung Balai, Tanjung Balai; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Bona Fernandez Martogitua Simbolon; Kejaksaan Negeri Belawan, Belawan; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Criminal law; Ultimate Remedium; Corruption |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The problem of corruption is not new in a country. So that the application of the ultimum remedium principle in corruption crimes provides a deterrent effect for the perpetrators to recover assets from state losses. The ultimum remedium principle places criminal law as a last resort in realizing legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine the principle of criminal law as a last resort (Ultimate Remedium) as an Effort in the Eradication of Corruption and how effective the ultimum remedium principle is in eradicating corruption.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative research. Normative or doctrinal legal research is a legal research that puts the law as a building system of norms. The technique of data collection is done by literature study.Results of the Research: The study results show that the ultimum remedium principle is very effective if the punishment given to the perpetrators of corruption is in the form of hefty penalties to provide a deterrent effect and provide an example for the community not to do so. This study concludes that the ultimum remedium principle is the last step in achieving legal justice, legal certainty, and legal benefits. So that an integral criminal justice system is carried out with a systemic approach with related policy arrangements in the field of structuring legal substance, legal structures or institutions, and legal culture. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | Faculty of Social and Law Quality University, Medan; Kejaksaan Negeri Tanjung Balai, Tanjung Balai; Kejaksaan Negeri Belawan, Belawan |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2022-12-30 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1039 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1039 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Volume 28 Issue 4, December 2022 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2022 Aras Firdaus, Renhard Harve, Bona Fernandez Martogitua Simbolon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
