Loss of Advocate Immunity Due To Obstruction Of Justice Based On Criminal Provisions
)
(1) Faculty of Law Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The enforceability of Article 16 and the Constitutional Court decision number 26/PUU-XI/2013 does not necessarily exempt advocates from alleged intervention in the enforcement process in carrying out their profession to defend clients, but that right can be lost said the lawyer committed a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to explain the right of attorney immunity can be lost when committing a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research with a statute legal approach and a conceptual approach.
Results of the Research: Advocates in terms of exercising their profession require immunity rights, but the use of immunity rights has definitive conditions that must be considered as stipulated in Article 16 of law no. 18 of 2003. The act of an advocate should be suspected of committing a criminal act of obstruction of justice if the act is not related to his professional duties and is not based on good faith. The action taken by The Advocate in relation to his professional duties has the meaning that the action is carried out for the benefit of the client's defense. Good faith referred to in Article 16 is to carry out professional duties for the sake of establishing justice based on the law to defend the interests of its clients.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1071
Published
2022-12-30
How To Cite
@article{SASI1071,
author = {Sabela Gayo},
title = {Loss of Advocate Immunity Due To Obstruction Of Justice Based On Criminal Provisions},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {28},
number = {4},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Obstruction; Imunity; Justice},
abstract = {Introduction: The enforceability of Article 16 and the Constitutional Court decision number 26/PUU-XI/2013 does not necessarily exempt advocates from alleged intervention in the enforcement process in carrying out their profession to defend clients, but that right can be lost said the lawyer committed a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to explain the right of attorney immunity can be lost when committing a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research with a statute legal approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: Advocates in terms of exercising their profession require immunity rights, but the use of immunity rights has definitive conditions that must be considered as stipulated in Article 16 of law no. 18 of 2003. The act of an advocate should be suspected of committing a criminal act of obstruction of justice if the act is not related to his professional duties and is not based on good faith. The action taken by The Advocate in relation to his professional duties has the meaning that the action is carried out for the benefit of the client's defense. Good faith referred to in Article 16 is to carry out professional duties for the sake of establishing justice based on the law to defend the interests of its clients.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {599--607} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1071},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1071}
}
Journal Article
Arif, K. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Imunitas Advokat Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Iqtisad, Vol.5, (No.1), 2018 .p.31. http://dx.doi.org/10.31942/iq.v5i1. 2206
Atmaja, Ida Wayan Dharma Punia., & Suardana, I Wayan., & Wirasila, AA Ngurah. Hak Imunitas Advokat dalam Persidangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kertha Wicara:Journal Ilmu Hukum,Vol.7,(No.5),2018. pp.1-13https://ojs.unud.ac. id/index. php/kerthawicara/article/view/43617
Benuf, Cornelius & Azhar, Mohammed. Legal research methods as instruments reduce contemporary legal problems. Journal Of Justice, Vol.7, (No.1), 2020, p.22.https://doi.org/10.14710/ gk.7.1.20- 33
Bijayanti., & Darmadi. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Advokat pada Obstruction of Justice dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Vol.9, (No.4),2020, pp.46-55 https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/a rticle/view/58244
Gareda. Perbuatan Menghalangi Proses Peradilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi berdasarkan Pasal 21 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 Juncto UU No. 20 Tahun 2001. Lex Crimen, Vol. IV, (No. 1),2015, p.136. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/ index.php/lexcrimen/article/viewFile/7009/6514
Harnita. Analisis Tindakan Obstruction of Justice Advokat dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. JOM Fakultas Hukum, Vol. V, (Edisi2),2018, p.8. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index. php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/21877/21171
Imron. The role and position of the Four Pillars in law enforcement judges police prosecutors and advocates are linked to law enforcement in corruption cases. Surya Kencana Dua Journal: dynamics of Law and justice issues, Vol.6, (No.1,),2016, p.92. http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk. v6i1. 340
Junianto. Obstrcution of Justice dalam Pasal, 21 Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentangPemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Media Juris, Vol. 2, (No. 3, ),2019, p.340. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mi.v2i3.15208
Khambali. Hak Imunitas Advokat Tidak Terbatas, Jurnal Universitas Proklamasi 45 Yogyakarta,Vol.13,(No.1),2017,p.22. https://ejournal. up45.ac.id/index.php/cakrawala-hukum/ article/ view/328
Loi. Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Hak Imunitas Seorang Advokat yang Melakukan Tindakan Obstruction of Justice dalam Perkara Korupsi (Contoh Putusan Nomor 90/Pid.Sus- TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Vol.3, (No.1),2020, p.704. https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/adigama/ar ticle/viewFile/8953/5737
Rakinaung, Vicky Y. Kajian Hukum Terhdap Pengacara yang dengan Sengaja menghalangi, Mempersulit Jalannya Penyidikan, Penuntutan serta Proses Peradilan terhadap Terdakwa dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, Vol.VIII, (No.4),2019, p.192. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index. php/lexcrimen/article/view/25669/25321
Rompis. Kewenangan Advokat Didalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Guna Menunjang Sistem Peradilan Terpadu. Lex et Societatis, Vol.I,(No.2),2013, p.126. https://doi.org/10.357 96/les.v1i2.1756
Nyoman & Purwoto. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Advokat Pelaku Tindak Pidana Suap terhadap Hakim (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1319k/pid. sus/2016). Diponegoro Law Review Vol.6,(No.2),2017, pp.1-15. http://www.ejournals1. undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr
Solehuddin. Manakar Hak Imunitas Profesi Advokat. Rechtldee Jurnal Hukum, Vol.10, (No.1),2015, p.92.https://doi.org/10.21107/ri. v10i1.1141
Tarek. Tindak Pidana Menghalangi Proses Hukum Penyelidikan, Penyidikan, Penuntutan Sampai Peradilan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, Vol. VIII, (No. 3),2019, pp. 146- 147 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/ lexcrimen/article/view/25642/25295
Tulandi. Menghalangi Penyidikan dan Penuntutan untuk Kepentingan Orang Lain Menurut Pasal 221 ayat (1) KUHPIDANA. Lex Crimen,Vol.IV,(No.6),2015,p.130. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrime n/article/view/9800
Vandervort, L. Mistake of Law and Obstruction of Justice : A Bad Excuse Even for a Lawyer. University of New Brunswick Law Journal,Vol.50,2001, p.174 https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/unblj/articl e/view/29482
Winata., & Dewanto. Batasan terhadap Imunitas Advokat yang Diperluas Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.16, (No.1.Februari-Juli),2020, pp.45-46. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v16i1.2974
Yuherawan. Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Cases : How Does the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Commission Investigate the Case. Journal of Indonesia Legal Studies. Vol. 5,(No.1),2020, pp.245-248. https://doi.org/10. 15294/jils.v5i1.38575.
Book
Ali, Mahrus, Asas, Teori dan Praktek Hukum Pidana Korupsi, (Yogyakarta: UII Press,2013)
Agustina, Shinta., Isra, Saldri., & Daulay, Zaenul. Obstruction of Justice, (Jakarta: Themis Book, 2015)
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Jakarta : Kencana, 2008)
Sianturi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia dan Penerapan, (Jakarta : Storia Grafika, 2022)
Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. (Bogor: Politeia, 1994)
Soekanto, Soerjono & Mamudji, Sri, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. (Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003)
Harijatip, Sri, Hukum Acara Pidana.( Badan Jakarta : Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kejaksaan, 2016)
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Fadli, Khairul. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana oleh Anggota Polisi Republik Indonesia yang Merintangi proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Universitas Riau,2013, p,6. http://repository.unri.ac.id:80/handle/12345678 9/4612
: 783 times
Download : 404 times
Cited-By:
1. The Implementation of Advocate Immunity Rights in the Criminal Offense of Obstruction f Justice
Fauziah Lubis, M. Iqbal Nasution
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental vol: 18 issue: 8 first page: e06679 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Loss of Advocate Immunity Due To Obstruction Of Justice Based On Criminal Provisions |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Sabela Gayo; Faculty of Law Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Jakarta; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Obstruction; Imunity; Justice |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The enforceability of Article 16 and the Constitutional Court decision number 26/PUU-XI/2013 does not necessarily exempt advocates from alleged intervention in the enforcement process in carrying out their profession to defend clients, but that right can be lost said the lawyer committed a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to explain the right of attorney immunity can be lost when committing a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research with a statute legal approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: Advocates in terms of exercising their profession require immunity rights, but the use of immunity rights has definitive conditions that must be considered as stipulated in Article 16 of law no. 18 of 2003. The act of an advocate should be suspected of committing a criminal act of obstruction of justice if the act is not related to his professional duties and is not based on good faith. The action taken by The Advocate in relation to his professional duties has the meaning that the action is carried out for the benefit of the client's defense. Good faith referred to in Article 16 is to carry out professional duties for the sake of establishing justice based on the law to defend the interests of its clients. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | Faculty of Law Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Jakarta |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2022-12-30 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1071 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1071 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Volume 28 Issue 4, December 2022 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files |
Untitled (103KB) |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2022 Sabela Gayo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. The Implementation of Advocate Immunity Rights in the Criminal Offense of Obstruction f Justice
Fauziah Lubis, M. Iqbal Nasution
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental vol: 18 issue: 8 first page: e06679 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
Email this article 
