Criminal Sentence Disparity of Village Funds Abuse In Maluku
), John Dirk Pasalbessy(2), Jacob Hattu(3), Yonna Beatrix Salamor(4)
(1) Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Difference or disparity in sentencing is one of the important topics in criminal law. The disparity in sentencing means that there are differences in the amount of punishment handed down by the court in cases that have the same characteristics.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to find out why there is a disparity in criminal penalties in court verdicts in cases of corruption in the misuse of village funds in Maluku.
Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method.
Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, essentially the disparity in imposing criminal penalties in court verdicts on corruption cases of misuse of village funds is due to strafmaat (criminal threats) for different perpetrators.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1155
Published
2023-03-11
How To Cite
@article{SASI1155,
author = {Patrick Corputty and John Pasalbessy and Jacob Hattu and Yonna Salamor},
title = {Criminal Sentence Disparity of Village Funds Abuse In Maluku},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {29},
number = {1},
year = {2023},
keywords = {Disparity; Corruption; Village Fund},
abstract = {Introduction: Difference or disparity in sentencing is one of the important topics in criminal law. The disparity in sentencing means that there are differences in the amount of punishment handed down by the court in cases that have the same characteristics.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to find out why there is a disparity in criminal penalties in court verdicts in cases of corruption in the misuse of village funds in Maluku.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, essentially the disparity in imposing criminal penalties in court verdicts on corruption cases of misuse of village funds is due to strafmaat (criminal threats) for different perpetrators.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {184--191} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1155},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1155}
}
Journal Article
Abidin, Muhammad Zainul. “Tinjauan Atas Pelaksanaan Keuangan Desa Dalam Mendukung Kebijakan Dana Desa.” Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik 6, no. 1 (2015): 61–76.
Adwitya, Ida Bagus Agung Dwi, Ida Bagus Surya Sarmajaya, and I Gusti Ngurah Parwata. “Disparitas Putusan Sanksi Pidana Tindak Pidana (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gianyar Dan Denpasar).” Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 2015.
Anjani, Ajeng Kartika. “Pertanggungjawaban Pengelolaan Dana Desa.” Jurist-Diction 2, no. 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v2i3.14288.
Ardiansyah, Irfan. “Pengaruh Disparitas Pemidanaan Terhadap Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Respublica 7, no. 1 (2017).
“Data Badan Pusat Statistik Tahun 2020,” n.d.
Jannah, Selfie Miftahul. “Dana Desa Meningkat, Tiap Desa Rata-Rata Dapat Rp960 Juta Tahun Ini.” tirto.id, 2020. https://tirto.id/dana-desa-meningkat-tiap-desa-rata-rata-dapat-rp960-juta-tahun-ini-esQu.
Kadir, Yusrianto, and Roy Marthen Moonti. “Pencegahan Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 6, no. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i 3.583 https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i 3.583.
Karnasudirja, H Eddy Djunaidi. “Beberapa Pedoman Pemidanaan Dan Pengamatan Narapidana,Pengadilan Kudus.” Jakarta, 1983.
Kleden, Kristoforus Laga. “Pendekatan Viktimologi Meminimalisir Disparitas Pidana Related Papers.” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus 2, no. 2 (2019).
Litbang Mahkamah Agung. “Kedudukan Dan Yurisprudensu Untuk Mengurangi Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan,.” Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI, 2010.
Nafidah, Lina Nasihatun, and Mawar Suryaningtyas. “Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Pembangunan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat.” BISNIS : Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen Islam 3, no. 1 (2015): 213–39. https://doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v3i1.1480.
Pinarta, I Putu Bayu, and I Ketut Mertha. “Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Analisis Disparitas Penanggulangan Penjatuhan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnla Kertja Semaya 8, no. 10 (2020).
Putra, M Robby Perdana, and Dey Ravena. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Menanggulangi Disparitas Pidana Oleh Hakim Dalam Kasus Korupsi Dihubungkan Dengan Kebebasan Hakim.” In Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, 2016.
Putri, Angraini, Fauzan Muzakki, Muhammad Qadar Ramadhan, and Siti Rachma. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 10/Pid.Sus- TPK/2021/PT DKI.” Jurnal IKAMAKUM 1, no. 2 (2021).
Safii, Imron. “Urgensi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Yang Bersih Dan Berwibawa.” Jurnal Pandecta 9, no. 1 (2014).
“Studi Atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” n.d.
Zakariya, Rizki. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pencegahan Korupsi Dana Desa : Mengenali Modus Operandi.” Jurnal INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Anti Korupsi 6, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.670.
Book
Amiruddin, and Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.
Manson, Allan. The Law of Sentencing. Irwin Law, 2001.
Soekarto, Soeryono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 1984
: 409 times
Download : 309 times
Copyright (c) 2023 Patrick Corputty, John Dirk Pasalbessy, Jacob Hattu, Yonna Beatrix Salamor
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Email this article 
