Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi


*Muhammad Iwan Satriawan - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Lampung, Indonesia
Mukhlis Mukhlis - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia
CrossMark

Abstract

This study will focus discuss to changes in the authority of the constitutional court in indonesia. That since given authority decide a dispute the outcome of an election both at the central and local the constitutional court as if stuck to the award political reasons and there are several judge involved a corruption scandal decisions dispute the outcome of an election . So the establishment of judicial special election into a the substance of things not cleared by the formation of function constitutional court (M.K) as a squire the constitution where whose main duty is interpret the act. This research uses the method juridical normative by comparing function m.k in some countries and how the application of ideal in Indonesia.

Keywords

Constitutional Court; Judicial special election

How To Cite


APA: Satriawan, M.I., & Mukhlis, M. (2018). Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi. SASI, 24(1), 47-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118.
IEEE: M.I. Satriawan, and M. Mukhlis, "Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi", SASI, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47-58, Jul. 2018. Accessed on: Apr. 21, 2021. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118
Harvard: Satriawan, M.I., and Mukhlis, M., (2018). "Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi". SASI, Volume 24(1), pp. 47-58. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118 (Accessed on: 21 April 2021)
Chicago: Satriawan, Muhammad Iwan, and Mukhlis Mukhlis. "Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi." SASI 24, no. 1 (July 8, 2018): 47-58. Accessed April 21, 2021. doi:10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118
Vancouver: Satriawan MI, Mukhlis M. Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi. SASI [Internet]. 2018 Jul 8 [cited 2021 Apr 21];24(1):47-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118
MLA 8th: Satriawan, Muhammad Iwan, and Mukhlis Mukhlis. "Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi." SASI, vol. 24, no. 1, 8 Jul. 2018, pp. 47-58, doi:10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118. Accessed 21 Apr. 2021.
BibTeX:
@article{SASI118,
			author = {Muhammad Satriawan and Mukhlis Mukhlis},
			title = {Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi},
			journal = {SASI},
			volume = {24},
			number = {1},
			year = {2018},
			keywords = {Constitutional Court; Judicial special election},
			abstract = {This study will focus discuss to changes in the authority of the constitutional court in indonesia. That since given authority decide a dispute the outcome of an election both at the central and local the constitutional court as if stuck to the award political reasons and there are several judge involved a corruption scandal decisions dispute the outcome of an election . So the establishment of judicial special election into a the substance of things not cleared by the formation of function constitutional court (M.K) as a squire the constitution where whose main duty is interpret the act. This research uses the method juridical normative by comparing function m.k in some countries and how the application of ideal in Indonesia.},
					issn = {2614-2961},			pages = {47--58}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118},
					url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/118}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 

Abdurrahman, Satrio. (2015), Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu Sebagai Bentuk Judicialization of Politics, Jurnal Konstitusi,Volume 12 Nomor 1 Maret ,Jakarta:Mahkamah konstitusi.

Harman, Benny K. (2013), Mempertimbangkan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta:Gramedia.

Amsari, Feri. (2013), Perubahan UUD 1945,Jakarta:Rajawali Press.

Zoelva, Hamdan. (2013), Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, dalam Jurnal Mahkamah Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 3, September,Jakarta:Mahkamah Konstitusi

Asshidiqie, Jimly. (2005), Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara, Jakarta:KONpress.

Taib, Mukhlis. (2017), Dinamika Perundang-Undnagan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Reflika Aditama.

Huda, Ni’matul dan Nazriyah, R. , (2011), Teori dan Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Bandung: Nusa Media.

Wibowo, Pramono Anung, (2013). Mahalnya Demokrasi Memudarnya Ideologi, Jakarta: Kompas.

Isra, Saldi, (2017). Pemilu dan Pemulihan Daulat Rakyat, Jakarta: Themis Publishing.

Soimin dan Mashuriyanto, (2013). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Sudirman, (2016). Memurnikan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Lembaga Pengawal Konstitusi, Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Tahun 1 Nomor 1 Juni 2016,Malang:Universitas Malang

Pane, Thorkis, (2011). Kemungkinan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Bawah Undang-Undang sebagai Objek Pengujian Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Tahun ke-41 No.3 Juli 2011, Jakarta:Universitas Indonesia.

Junaidi, Veri, (2013). Mahkamah Konstitusi Bukan Mahkamah Kalkulator, Jakarta: Themis

Book

Ekatjahjana, Widodo, (2007). Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Menurut UUD 1945, Sebuah disertasi Progam Pasca Sarjana UNPAD,Tahun 2007.

Zainal, Arifin Hoesein dan Yasin, Rahman, (2015). Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung (Penguatan Konsep dan Penerapannya), Jakarta: LP2AB.

http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4d54dda21b2c0/hakim-arsyad-terbukti-langgar-kode-etik, http://orintononline.blogspot.co.id/2013/02/teori-hukum-murni.html,

http://www.Kbbi.kata.web.id/memurnikan/

http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/09/12/10124921/patrialis-akbar-tidak-ajukan-banding-atas-vonis-8-tahun-penjara

UUD 1945

Undang-Undang No.7 Tahun 1953

Undang-Undang No.3 Tahun 1999

Undang-Undang No.12 Tahun 2003

Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 2003

Undang-Undang No.32 Tahun 2004

Undang-Undang No.12 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah

Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti

Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati dan Walikota menjadi Undang-Undang

Undang-Undang No.10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati dan Walikota

99 times.
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Views: 222 times.

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Mahkamah Agung ( Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 65 P/HUM/2018)
Suparto Suparto
SASI  vol: 27  issue: 1  first page: 61  year: 2021  
Type: Journal [View Source]






Copyright (c) 2018 Muhammad Iwan Satriawan, Mukhlis Mukhlis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.