Integration Between Customary Law and National Law: An Effort to Build a Pancasila Prismatic Law State
), Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo(2)
(1) Faculty of Law Semarang University, Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University under the Royal Patronage of Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat, Bangkok, Thailand
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: This article to examine and analyze aspects of integration between national law and customary law in the context of the prismatic Pancasila state law, especially after the enactment of the draft criminal code (RKUHP) as a law.
Purpose of The Research: This research seeks to answer two problem formulations, namely: integration of customary law and national law in the Pancasila law state and how are efforts to organize harmonious relations between customary law and national law in the perspective of the prismatic Pancasila state law, especially after the ratification of the RKUHP.
Methods of Research: This study uses normative legal research methods based on authoritative legal products in the form of laws and regulations. The analysis was carried out by prioritizing the concept approach, historical approach, and statutory approach.
Result of The Research: Even though customary law and national law are different in substance and character, but customary law and national law must be integrated because have important relations in relation to practice in society. Efforts to organize a harmonious relationship between customary law and national law in the perspective of the Pancasila prismatic state law, especially after the ratification of the RKUHP by optimizing the three year transitional provisions in the RKUHP to socialize as well as determining steps and efforts that can guarantee harmonious relations between customary law and national law.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v29i2.1304
Published
2023-04-19
How To Cite
@article{SASI1304,
author = {Amri Sihotang and Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo},
title = {Integration Between Customary Law and National Law: An Effort to Build a Pancasila Prismatic Law State},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {29},
number = {2},
year = {2023},
keywords = {Customary Law; National Law; Pancasila Law State},
abstract = {Introduction: This article to examine and analyze aspects of integration between national law and customary law in the context of the prismatic Pancasila state law, especially after the enactment of the draft criminal code (RKUHP) as a law. Purpose of The Research: This research seeks to answer two problem formulations, namely: integration of customary law and national law in the Pancasila law state and how are efforts to organize harmonious relations between customary law and national law in the perspective of the prismatic Pancasila state law, especially after the ratification of the RKUHP.Methods of Research: This study uses normative legal research methods based on authoritative legal products in the form of laws and regulations. The analysis was carried out by prioritizing the concept approach, historical approach, and statutory approach. Result of The Research: Even though customary law and national law are different in substance and character, but customary law and national law must be integrated because have important relations in relation to practice in society. Efforts to organize a harmonious relationship between customary law and national law in the perspective of the Pancasila prismatic state law, especially after the ratification of the RKUHP by optimizing the three year transitional provisions in the RKUHP to socialize as well as determining steps and efforts that can guarantee harmonious relations between customary law and national law.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {248--258} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v29i2.1304},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1304}
}
Journal Article
Abiyoso, Yunani, Ali Abdillah, Ryan Muthiara Wasti, Ghurnarsa Sujatnika, and Mustafa Fakhri. “Adat Institutions In Aceh Government: A Constitutional Perspective Constitutional Perspective.” Journal of Islamic Law Studies 4, no. 1 (2020): 1–15.
Antasari, Rr Rina. “Telaah Terhadap Perkembangan Tipe Tatanan Hukum Di Indonesia Perspektif Pemikiran Nonet-Selznick Menuju Hukum Yang Berkeadilan.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 19, no. 1 (2019): 103–18. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v19i1.3344.
Ash-shidiqqi, Ellectrananda Anugerah. “Rule of Law Dalam Perspektif Critical Legal Studies.” Amnesti Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2021): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v3i1.895.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Friedrich Carl von Savigny Tentang Hukum: Hukum Sebagai Manifestasi Jiwa Bangsa.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (July 7, 2020): 201–36. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236.
Bateman, G.G. “The Ough To Be a Law: Gustav Radbruch, Lon L. Fuller, and H.L.A. Hart on The Choice Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism.” The Journal Jurisprudence 271, no. 1 (2019): 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi042.
Čehulić, Mateja. “Perspectives of Legal Culture.” Revija Za Sociologiju 51, no. 2 (August 31, 2021): 257–82. https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.51.2.4.
Disantara, Fradhana Putra. “Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia Sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum.” Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 6, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.35673/ajmpi.v6i1.1129.
Disantara, Fradhana Putra, Bayu Dwi Anggono, and A’An Efendi. “Mendudukkan Norma Etika: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat Terhadap Relasi Etika Dan Hukum.” Rechtsidee 10, no. 2 (2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773.
Disantara, Fradhana Putra, Septina Andriani Naftali, R. Yuri Andina Putra, Dwi Irmayati, and Galih Rahmawati. “Enigma Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 5, no. 1 (2022): 61–79. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4135.
Hario Mahar, Mitendra. “Fenomena Dalam Kekosongan Hukum.” RechtsVinding Online, 2018, 2.
Hazar Kusmayanti, Dede Kania, Galuh Puspaningrum. “Praktik Beracara Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat Sumatera Barat Berdasarkan Asas Bajanjang Naiak Batanggo Turun.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 187.
Herabudin. “Implementation of Norms And Ethics In Public Services In Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi) 6, no. 2 (2022): 1901.
Hidayat, Arif, and Zaenal Arifin. “Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (October 15, 2019): 133. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654.
Hikmah, Nurul. “Fikih Waris.” In Ilmu Fikih, 1st ed., 181. Banyumas: Wawasan Ilmu, 2022.
Kristiani, Verlia. “Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Bagi Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Kajian Dan Implementasi).” Adil 11, no. 1 (2020): 144–63.
Murken, Lisa, and Christoph Gornott. “The Importance of Different Land Tenure Systems for Farmers’ Response to Climate Change: A Systematic Review.” Climate Risk Management 35, no. February (2022): 100419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100419.
Mustamam, Marzuki. “The Position Of Pancasila In The Arrangement Of The Types And Hierarchy Of Laws.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 23, no. 1 (2020): 453–54.
Pohwain, Natalia Lidya, Jemmy Jefry Pietersz, and Revency Vania Rugebregt. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Yang Lingkungan Hidupnya Tercemar.” TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 5 (2021): 508–16.
Prasetio, Dicky Eko, Fradhana Putra Disantara, Nadia Husna Azzahra, and Dita Perwitasari. “The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law.” Rechtsidee 8 (March 9, 2021): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702.
Ramdan, Ajie. “Kontroversi Delik Penghinaan Presiden/Wakil Presiden Dalam RKUHP.” Yudisial 13, no. 2 (2020): 246.
Rato, Dominikus. “Perlindungan Ham Masyarakat Hukum Adat Yang Bhinneka Tunggal Ika Di Era Digital.” Majalah Hukum Nasional 51, no. 2 (2021): 157.
———. “Realisme Hukum: Peradilan Adat Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Sosial.” Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum 1, no. 2 (July 31, 2021): 285. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v1i2.24998.
Setianingrum, Reni Budi, and M. Hawin. “Harmonization of Competition Law: Research on The Transplantability of Eu’s Law into ASEAN.” Yuridika 35, no. 3 (2020): 613. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v35i3.21179.
Simarmata, Rikardo. “Kedudukan Dan Peran Peradilan Adat Pasca-Unifikasi Sistem Peradilan Formal.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 2 (2021): 282.
Book
Hidayat, Ferry. Pancasila: Perspektif Pendiri RI Dan Problematikannya. 1st ed. STBA Pertiwi Bekasi, 2017.
MahfudMD, Moh. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Desentralisasi Dalam Tata Pemerintahan Kolonial Hindia-Belanda (Kebijakan Dan Upaya Sepanjang Babak Akhir Kekuasaan Kolonial Di Indonesia (1900-1940). 1st ed. Surabaya: Bayumedia, 2004.
Yunaldi, Wendra. Nagari Dan Negara: Perspektif Otentik Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Jual Buku Sastra, 2021.
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Amirullah. “YLBHI: 51 Anggota Masyarakat Adat Dikriminalisasi Sepanjang 2019.” tempo.co, 2019. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1281756/ylbhi-51-anggota-masyarakat-adat-dikriminalisasi-sepanjang-2019/full&view=ok.
Nurita, Dewi. “Terusir Dari Kampung Sendiri: Perampasan Tanah Ulayat Dan Satu Dekade RUU Masyarakat Adat Mangkrak.” interaktif.tempo.co, 2022.
: 516 times
Download : 317 times
Copyright (c) 2023 Amri Panahatan Sihotang, Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
