Aspek Legal Spirit Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Lampung, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Families are places where everyone in the family feels safe and comfortable from acts o violence, but in reality violence also accurs whitin the family. The enactment of Law No. 23 of 2004 on the abolition of domestic violence (hereinafter referred to as the Law of Domestic Violence) aims to prevent all forms of domestic violence, protect domestic violence victims, prosecute domestic violence perpetrators, and maintain wholeness harmonious and prosperous households. In handling it is sometimes resolved peacefully. This raises the question of whether the Law on Elimination of Domestic Violence has guaranteed the settlement of Domestic Violence according to its objectives? All forms of violence against women and children constitute a violation of human rights, so it is necessary to be protected by their dignity and dignity and guaranteed their right to life in accordance with their nature and nature without discrimination. The Criminal Act contained in Article 5 of the Act states that prohibited violence is physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, or neglect of the household. Many cases of domestic violence are reported but not a few are repealed by the victim for various reasons, such as still loving the perpetrator, and the perpetrator is the breadwinner in the household. The resolution of cases of domestic violence is also up to the court's decision, but this certainly brings the consequences of the objective of the Law on Elimination of Domestic Violence. Despite all forms of prevention of domestic violence, protecting the victim, prosecuting the perpetrator is reached but if the case is passed on to the court decision whether the goal of maintaining a harmonious and prosperous household unity can be achieved. The resolution of domestic violence requires the wisdom of the Law Enforcers (Police, Prosecutors, Judges).
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v24i2.131
Published
2019-02-28
How To Cite
@article{SASI131, author = {Elias Leasa}, title = {Aspek Legal Spirit Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {24}, number = {2}, year = {2019}, keywords = {Legal Spirit; Violence; Household}, abstract = {Families are places where everyone in the family feels safe and comfortable from acts o violence, but in reality violence also accurs whitin the family. The enactment of Law No. 23 of 2004 on the abolition of domestic violence (hereinafter referred to as the Law of Domestic Violence) aims to prevent all forms of domestic violence, protect domestic violence victims, prosecute domestic violence perpetrators, and maintain wholeness harmonious and prosperous households. In handling it is sometimes resolved peacefully. This raises the question of whether the Law on Elimination of Domestic Violence has guaranteed the settlement of Domestic Violence according to its objectives? All forms of violence against women and children constitute a violation of human rights, so it is necessary to be protected by their dignity and dignity and guaranteed their right to life in accordance with their nature and nature without discrimination. The Criminal Act contained in Article 5 of the Act states that prohibited violence is physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, or neglect of the household. Many cases of domestic violence are reported but not a few are repealed by the victim for various reasons, such as still loving the perpetrator, and the perpetrator is the breadwinner in the household. The resolution of cases of domestic violence is also up to the court's decision, but this certainly brings the consequences of the objective of the Law on Elimination of Domestic Violence. Despite all forms of prevention of domestic violence, protecting the victim, prosecuting the perpetrator is reached but if the case is passed on to the court decision whether the goal of maintaining a harmonious and prosperous household unity can be achieved. The resolution of domestic violence requires the wisdom of the Law Enforcers (Police, Prosecutors, Judges).}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {168--178} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v24i2.131}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/131} }
Apelldoorn, Van. (1975). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Cet. XIII, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. (1998). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2007). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Jakarta: Kencana.
Arif, Barda Nawawi. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Bentham, Jeremy. (2006). Teori Perundang-Undangan Prinsip-Prinsip Legislasi, Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Penerbit Nusamedia & Penerbit Nuansa.
Gosita, Arif. (1993). Masalah Korban Kejahatan, Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Hamzah, Andi. (1986). Perlindungan Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung: Binacipta.
Moeljatno. (1955). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Gajah Mada.
Mansur, Dikdik. M. Arief. (2007). Urgensi Perlidungan Korban Kejahatan Antara Norma dan Realita, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Packer, Herbert L. (1968). The Limits of Criminal Sanction.
Raharjo, Satjipto. (2005). Masalah Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Bandung,: Sinar Baru.
Schafer, Stephen. (1968). The Victim and Criminal, Random House, New York. Situmorang, Victor. (1988). Kedudukan Wanita Di Mata Hukum, Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
S R, Sianturi. dan E Y, Kanter. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Jakarta: Strori Grafika.
Soeroso, Moerti Hadiati. (2010). Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tanggga (Dalam Perspektif Yuridis-Kriminologi), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Tresna. (1959). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Tiara Limited.
Toule, E. R. M. (2016). Analisis Tentang Penjatuhan Pidana Bersyarat Terhadap Perkara Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, Jurnal Belo Bagian Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Unpatti dan MAHUPIKI, Vol.I No.1.
Cited-By:
1. Peran Detasemen Khusus 88 Anti Teror Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dalam menanggulangi Paham Radikalisme Di Kota Ambon
Dody Alfayed Siauta, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Elias Zadrach Leasa
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum vol: 4 issue: 6 first page: 489 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Di Media Sosial
Jihan Risya Cahyani Prameswari, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, Yonna Beatrix Salamor
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review vol: 1 issue: 1 first page: 55 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
3. The Philosophical of the Role of the Constitutional Court Related to the Certainty of Gender Equality Rights in Indonesia
Dessy Artina, Geofani Milthree Saragih, Tanto Lailam
SASI vol: 30 issue: 1 first page: 40 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
Copyright (c) 2019 Elias Zadrach Leasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Peran Detasemen Khusus 88 Anti Teror Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dalam menanggulangi Paham Radikalisme Di Kota Ambon
Dody Alfayed Siauta, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Elias Zadrach Leasa
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum vol: 4 issue: 6 first page: 489 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Di Media Sosial
Jihan Risya Cahyani Prameswari, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, Yonna Beatrix Salamor
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review vol: 1 issue: 1 first page: 55 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
3. The Philosophical of the Role of the Constitutional Court Related to the Certainty of Gender Equality Rights in Indonesia
Dessy Artina, Geofani Milthree Saragih, Tanto Lailam
SASI vol: 30 issue: 1 first page: 40 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]