Penetapan Waktu Pelaksanaan Banding Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pada Daerah Karakteristik Wilayah Kepulauan
)
(1) Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
The party that makes a legal appeal against the case that has been decided by the State Administrative Court is limited by the time to file an appeal to the High Administrative Court. This as stipulated in the provisions of Article 123 of Act Number 5 of 1986 which stipulates the time for legal appeal against the decision of the State Administrative Court is 14 days after the court decision is notified to him legally Determination of 14 (fourteen) times to submit an appeal for parties who are dissatisfied or accept the decision of the State Administrative Court as stipulated in the Provisions of Article 123 of Act Number 5 of 1986 which at the time the decision of the State Administrative Court was read out was not present at the hearing stipulated in the provisions of Article 108 paragraph (2) of Law Number 5 of 1986 and residing in an archipelago such as Maluku Province which has a large area and consists of islands, greatly affects the fulfillment of the timeliness determined to file an appeal . It has an impact on the effectiveness of setting 14 (fourteen) days as the deadline for filing an appeal law. Accordingly, based on these conditions, the stipulation of 14 (fourteen) days to file an appeal law is not effectively applied to regions that are characterized by islands. Only effective in areas with continental characteristics.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v24i2.133
Published
2019-02-28
How To Cite
@article{SASI133,
author = {Dezonda Pattipawae},
title = {Penetapan Waktu Pelaksanaan Banding Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pada Daerah Karakteristik Wilayah Kepulauan},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {24},
number = {2},
year = {2019},
keywords = {Implementation of Appeal; Decision of PTUN; Islands Region},
abstract = {The party that makes a legal appeal against the case that has been decided by the State Administrative Court is limited by the time to file an appeal to the High Administrative Court. This as stipulated in the provisions of Article 123 of Act Number 5 of 1986 which stipulates the time for legal appeal against the decision of the State Administrative Court is 14 days after the court decision is notified to him legally Determination of 14 (fourteen) times to submit an appeal for parties who are dissatisfied or accept the decision of the State Administrative Court as stipulated in the Provisions of Article 123 of Act Number 5 of 1986 which at the time the decision of the State Administrative Court was read out was not present at the hearing stipulated in the provisions of Article 108 paragraph (2) of Law Number 5 of 1986 and residing in an archipelago such as Maluku Province which has a large area and consists of islands, greatly affects the fulfillment of the timeliness determined to file an appeal . It has an impact on the effectiveness of setting 14 (fourteen) days as the deadline for filing an appeal law. Accordingly, based on these conditions, the stipulation of 14 (fourteen) days to file an appeal law is not effectively applied to regions that are characterized by islands. Only effective in areas with continental characteristics.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {192--204} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v24i2.133},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/133}
}
Indroharto. (2001). Teori dan Praktek Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Grafindo.
Kansil, C.S.T. (1996) Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Nirahua, Salmon E.M. (2013). Hukum Perizinan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Wilayah Laut Daerah, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Saiyung, (2000). Mencegah Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Tergugat Dalam PTUN (Analisis Hukum dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan), Jakarta: Depdagri dan Yayasan Kajian Informasi Perundang-Undangan.
Tjandra, Riawan. (2009). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mendorong Terwujudnya Pemerintah Yang Bersih Dan Berwibawa, Yogyakarta: Universitas Adma Jaya.
Wiyono, R. (2008). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
: 851 times
Download : 25435 times
Cited-By:
1. Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Milik No.325/Desawongsorejo dalam Perkara Putusan Nomor. 578/K/TUN/2020 Jo Putusan Nomor. 112/B/2020/PT.TUN SBY Jo Putusan Nomor. 128/G/2019/PTUN.SBY
Billa Amara Bittaqwa, Lutfian Ubaidillah
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice vol: 1 issue: 4 first page: 10 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Strategies to Realize Prosperity for Provinces With Islands in Indonesia
Oksep Adhayanto, Nazaki, Nanik Rahmawati, Bismar Arianto, Nurhasanah Suwardi, Rudy Subiakto, Suryadi, Eki Darmawan, Ryan Anggria Pratama
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science vol: 1095 issue: 1 first page: 012010 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
Copyright (c) 2019 Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Milik No.325/Desawongsorejo dalam Perkara Putusan Nomor. 578/K/TUN/2020 Jo Putusan Nomor. 112/B/2020/PT.TUN SBY Jo Putusan Nomor. 128/G/2019/PTUN.SBY
Billa Amara Bittaqwa, Lutfian Ubaidillah
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice vol: 1 issue: 4 first page: 10 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Strategies to Realize Prosperity for Provinces With Islands in Indonesia
Oksep Adhayanto, Nazaki, Nanik Rahmawati, Bismar Arianto, Nurhasanah Suwardi, Rudy Subiakto, Suryadi, Eki Darmawan, Ryan Anggria Pratama
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science vol: 1095 issue: 1 first page: 012010 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
Email this article 
