The Crime of Blasphemy in Indonesia: A Comparative Study
(1) Faculty of Sharia State Islamic Religious Institute Lhokseumawe, Lhokseumawe, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Religion Blasphemy has occasionally been committed in numerous media. Blasphemy instances that started out in print media have since proliferated in the virtual world thanks to numerous features and platforms. Because freedom of religion is guaranteed and protected by the Indonesian Constitution, anyone who blasphemes against a particular faith may face severe legal consequences.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims at analyzing the offense of blasphemy against religion in the perspective of Islamic law and Indonesian law.
Methods of the Research: This type of research is legalistic, doctrinal or normative. The approach used in normative or legalistic research include a concept approach, a statute approach, historical approach, case approach, and comparative approach. However, this study only uses comparative approach since it analyzes of regarding blasphemous crimes in perspective Indonesian and Islamic criminal laws.
Results of the Research: The government enacted various laws and rules to maintain religious harmony. However, in terms of law enforcement, are the provisions most frequently used to charge those who commit religious blasphemy. Whereas from the standpoint of Islamic law, blasphemy can take the form of defiling (tadnis), insulting (istihza), ridiculing (syatama), insulting (saba), cursing (taq), and challenging Islamic principles as well as engaging in actions that diverge from Islamic teachings (bid'ah). The Qur'an and the Hadith contain prohibitions against blasphemous acts, but the means of punishment are found in the nomenclature of Ijtihad of the Ulama, which was later incorporated into the laws of many Islamic nations. As a result, the formulation of punishments for blasphemers varies greatly.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v29i2.1374
Published
2023-04-19
How To Cite
@article{SASI1374, author = {Abdullah Abdullah}, title = {The Crime of Blasphemy in Indonesia: A Comparative Study}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {29}, number = {2}, year = {2023}, keywords = {Criminal Policy; Corruption; Fisheries}, abstract = {Introduction: Religion Blasphemy has occasionally been committed in numerous media. Blasphemy instances that started out in print media have since proliferated in the virtual world thanks to numerous features and platforms. Because freedom of religion is guaranteed and protected by the Indonesian Constitution, anyone who blasphemes against a particular faith may face severe legal consequences.Purposes of the Research: This study aims at analyzing the offense of blasphemy against religion in the perspective of Islamic law and Indonesian law.Methods of the Research: This type of research is legalistic, doctrinal or normative. The approach used in normative or legalistic research include a concept approach, a statute approach, historical approach, case approach, and comparative approach. However, this study only uses comparative approach since it analyzes of regarding blasphemous crimes in perspective Indonesian and Islamic criminal laws.Results of the Research: The government enacted various laws and rules to maintain religious harmony. However, in terms of law enforcement, are the provisions most frequently used to charge those who commit religious blasphemy. Whereas from the standpoint of Islamic law, blasphemy can take the form of defiling (tadnis), insulting (istihza), ridiculing (syatama), insulting (saba), cursing (taq), and challenging Islamic principles as well as engaging in actions that diverge from Islamic teachings (bid'ah). The Qur'an and the Hadith contain prohibitions against blasphemous acts, but the means of punishment are found in the nomenclature of Ijtihad of the Ulama, which was later incorporated into the laws of many Islamic nations. As a result, the formulation of punishments for blasphemers varies greatly.}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {354--367} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v29i2.1374}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1374} }
Journal Article
Akbar, Irwan. “Dinamika Kasus Penistaan Agama Di Indonesia (Polemik Pemaknaan Ayat-Ayat Penistaan Dan Undang-UNdang Penodaan Agama), ” QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur`an Dan Tafsir 3, no. 1 (2019): 89–105.
Bielefeldt, Heiner. “Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Human Right under Pressure.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 1, no. 1 (2012): 15–35.
Bohlander, Michael. “There Is No Compulsion in Religion: Freedom of Religion, Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Crimes Against Humanity at the Example of the Islamic Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan.” J. Islamic St. Prac. Int’enational Law 8 (2012): 36–40.
Crouch, Melissa A. “Law and Religion in Indonesia: The Constitutional Court and the Blasphemy Law.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 7, no. 1 (2012): 1–45.
Dahri, Muhammad. “Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama Di Indonesia: Tinjauan Pengaturan Perundang-Undangan Dan Konsep Hukum Islam.” At-Tafahum: Journal of Islamic Law 1, no. 2 (2017): 57–71.
Hatta, Muhammad. “Kejahatan Penistaan Agama Dan Konsekuensi Hukumnya.” Al’ Adl : Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 2 (2021): 342–68.
Hilman, Didi. “Tindak Pidana Agama Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam, Hukum Positif Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” MIZAN: Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 1 (2020): 31–46.
Idami, Zahratul. “Law Protection By A State For Religion Believers In Indonesia And Its Comparison With Islamic Laws.” Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 1 (2016): 69–92.
Ismuhadi. Analisa Pidana Hukum Dan Kriminologi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia. Medan: www.repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/12134/1/09E02103.pdf, 2019.
Makin, Al. “Not A Religious State; A Study of Three Indonesian Religious Leaders on The Relation of State And Religion.” Journal Indonesia and the Malay Word 45 (2017): 1–22.
Maula, Bani Syarif. “Religious Freedom In Indonesia Between Upholding Constitutional Provisions and Complying with Social Considerations.” Journal Of Indonesian Islam 7, no. 2 (2013): 383–403.
MD, Moh. Mahfud. “Politik Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Varia Peradilan XXV (2010): 2.
MS, Afriandi. “Criminal Law Analysis of Religious Blasphemy Violation in Aceh.” Dejure: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 17, no. 1 (2017): 1–12.
Medistiara, Yulida. “YLBHI Catat 38 Kasus Penodaan Agama Hingga Mei, Ada Yang Jerat ABG.” www.detik.com, 2020. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5141781/ylbhi-catat-38-kasus-penodaan-agama-hingga-mei-ada-yangjerat-abg.
Muktiomo. “Mengkaji Politik Hukum Kebebasan Beragama Dan Berkeyakinan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 2 (2012): 344–57.
Prasetyo, Kresna Adi. “Analisis Hukum Pidana Mengenai Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Di Indonesia.” Gorontalo Law Review 2, no. 1 (2019): 3.
Rahmawati, Mei. “Membedah Kasus Penistaan Agama Oleh Sang Murtad Kace, Vol 9, No 1 (2022), 24-36.” Ar-Raniry: International Journal of Islamic Studies 9, no. 1 (2022): 24–36.
Redaksi BBC News Indonesia. “Vlog Masak Babi Kurma: Mencari Batas Antara Lelucon Dan Penistaan Agama.” www.bbc.com, 2018. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/trensosial-46040537.
Redaksi. “Ustaz Abdul Somad Dilaporkan Ke Polda NTT.” www.cnnindonesia.com, 2019.
Ronald. “Ahok: Pidato Saya Baru Jadi Masalah Setelah Diposting Buni Yani.” www.detik.com, 2023. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3482873/ahok-pidato-saya-baru-jadi-masalah-setelah-diposting-buni-yani.
Septiani, Rina. “Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Syariah: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Pemikiran 17, no. 1 (2017): 28.
Shakir, Naeem. “Islamic Shariah and Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan.” Journal Of Islamic Law 4, no. 1 (2015): 307–17.
Tamale, Sylvia. “Exploring The Contours Of African Sexualities: Religion, Law And Power.” African Human Rights Law Journal 14, no. 1 (2012): 150–77.
Usman, Abir. “Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws as a Totem.” Journal of Islamic Law 5, no. 68 (2022): 72–73.
Winkle, Andrew B. Van. “Separation Of Religion And State In Japan: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Articles 20 And 89 of The Japanese Constitution.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association 21, no. 2 (2012): 363–70.
Yaqin, A. “Legal Research and Writting.” Malayan Law Journal SDN BHD 1 (2007): 10.
Book
Al-Baghawi, Imam Abu Muhammad al-Husain ibn Mas’ud. Tafsir Ma’alim at-Tanzil. 4th ed. Multan: Idarah Talifat Ashrafiyyah, n.d.
Al-Bugha, Mustafa Dib. Fikih Islam Lengkap. Jakarta: Media Dzikir, 2006.
Al-Qurthubi, Abu Abdullah bin Ahmad. Imam Al-Jam’i Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Islamabad: International Islamic University, 2004.
Al-Razi, Fakhr. Mafatih Al-Ghaib. Edited by Dar Al-Fikr. 7th ed. Beirut, 1994.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Delik Agama Dan Penghinaan Tuhan (Blasphemy) Di Indonesia Dan Perbandingan Berbagai Negara. Semarang: Penerbit UNDIP, 2007.
Artharini, Isyana. “Pelaporan Ahok Atas Tuduhan Menghina Agama Dan Pemilih.” www.bbc.com, 2016.
As-Shalih, Subhi. Membahas Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur‟an. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1999.
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenanda Media Group, 2017.
Jalaluddin. Phiscology Agama. Jakarta: Siantar Press, 2000.
Katir, Isma’il bin ‘Umar. Tafsir Qur’an Al-‘Azim. 4th ed. Madinah: Dar at-Taybah, 1999.
Muin, Abdul. Benturan NU-PKI 1948-1965. Jakarta: PB.NU Press, 2014.
Noer, Deliar. Gerakan Modern Islam Di Indonesia 1900-1942. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1980.
Pultoni. Panduan Pemantauan Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama Dan Ujaran Kebencian Atas Nama Agama. Jakarta: The Indonesian Legal Resounce Center, 2012.
Qureshy, Muhammad Ismail. Muhammad-The Messenger of God and the Law of Blasphemy in Islam and the West. Lahore: Nuqoosh, 2008.
Syarifuddin, Amir. Ushul Fiqh. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.
Taimiyah, Ibn. As-Sharim Al-Maslul ‘ala Syatimi Ar-Rasul. Juz I. Kaherah: Daar Ibn al-Jawaziy, 2016.
Taimiyyah, Imam Taqi al-Din Ahmad Ibn. Al-Sarim Al-Maslul ‘ala Syatim Al-Rasul. Lahore: Nuriyah Rizwiyah Publications, 2010.
Tim. Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Upaya Menjamin Kerukunan Umat Beragama. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2011.
Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Tafsir Al-Munir Li Al-Zuhaili. 7th ed. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’asir, 1418.
Copyright (c) 2023 Abdullah Abdullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.