Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi

Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae(1email)


(1) Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


The execution of the State Administrative Court Decision which has permanent legal force (inkracht van Gewijsde) in the era of autonomy is as wide as possible, and begins with the breakdown of the paradigm of regional autonomy in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 18, Article 18A and Article 18B, the implementation of regional government is based on the principles that become the normative basis. State Administrative Court decisions that cannot be executed have caused pessimism and apathy in society. The problem is that there is no executive power in the Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the Regulation of State Administration. This condition is an alarming fact that the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision has not been able to bring justice to the public in the administrative sphere of government. The principle of the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision, to place judicial control in the implementation of good governance becomes biased in the Indonesian constitutional system.


Keywords


Execution; State Administrative Court; Autonomy


DOI


10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151

Published


2019-08-24

How To Cite


APA: Pattipawae, D.R. (2019). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi. SASI, 25(1), 92-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151.
IEEE: D.R. Pattipawae, "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi", SASI, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 92-106, Aug. 2019. Accessed on: Apr. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151
Harvard: Pattipawae, D.R., (2019). "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi". SASI, Volume 25(1), pp. 92-106. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151 (Accessed on: 27 April 2024)
Chicago: Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana. "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi." SASI 25, no. 1 (August 24, 2019): 92-106. Accessed April 27, 2024. doi:10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151
Vancouver: Pattipawae DR. Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi. SASI [Internet]. 2019 Aug 24 [cited 2024 Apr 27];25(1):92-106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151
MLA 8th: Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana. "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi." SASI, vol. 25, no. 1, 24 Aug. 2019, pp. 92-106, doi:10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151. Accessed 27 Apr. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{SASI151,
		author = {Dezonda Pattipawae},
		title = {Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {25},
		number = {1},
		year = {2019},
		keywords = {Execution; State Administrative Court; Autonomy},
		abstract = {The execution of the State Administrative Court Decision which has permanent legal force (inkracht van Gewijsde) in the era of autonomy is as wide as possible, and begins with the breakdown of the paradigm of regional autonomy in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 18, Article 18A and Article 18B, the implementation of regional government is based on the principles that become the normative basis. State Administrative Court decisions that cannot be executed have caused pessimism and apathy in society. The problem is that there is no executive power in the Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the Regulation of State Administration. This condition is an alarming fact that the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision has not been able to bring justice to the public in the administrative sphere of government. The principle of the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision, to place judicial control in the implementation of good governance becomes biased in the Indonesian constitutional system.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {92--106}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/151}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Basah, Sjachran. (2001). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Sikap Tindak Administrasi Negara, Bandung: Alumni.

Friedrich, Carl C. (1999). Constitutional Government and Democracy: Theory and Practice in Europe and America, 5th ed. Weltham Mass, Blaidsdell Publishing Company.

Gadjong, Agussalim Andi. (2007). Pemerintahan Daerah, Kajian Politik dan Hukum, Ciawi-Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hatta, Mohammad, (2000). Kumpulan Karangan (I), Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Harahap, Zairin. (2001). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Indroharto. (1999). Usaha Memahami Undang-undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara buku I beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Marbun, S F. (2003). Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Martiman, Prodjohamidjojo. (2005) Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Raja Ghalia Indonesia.

Manan, Bagir. (2005). Otonomi Daerah-Filosofi, Sejarah Perkembangan dan Problematika, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Muljadi, Arief, (2005). Landasan dan Prinsip Hukum Otonomi Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, Cet. I, Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Marzuki, M. Laica. (2006). Berjalan-jalan di Ranah Hukum, Pikiran-pikiran Lepas, Jakarta: Konpress.

Nazroen, M. (1999). Masalah-Masalah Sekitar Otonomi Daerah, Jakarta: Wolters.

Pot, Van der, (1990). Handboek van het Nederlands Staatsrecht, WEJ Tjeenk Willink Zwolle.

Prinst, Darwin. (2005). Strategi Menangani Perkara Tata Usaha Negara, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rasyid, Roihan A. (2001). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Salim, Amarullah. (2000). Peranan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara sebagai Pengawasan Yusticial Terhadap Pemerintah Berdasarkan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dari Suatu Negara Hukum, Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara, Departemen Kehakiman.

Syafrudin, Ateng (2000). Pengaturan Koordinasi Pemerintahan di Daerah, Bandung: Tarsito.

Soehino. (2000). Perkembangan Pemerintahan Daerah, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Saleh, Syarif. (2003). Otonomi dan Daerah Otonom, Jakarta: Endang.

Wade, H. W. R. (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mawardi, Oentarto S. (2002). Setahun Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia, Makalah Seminar Nasional Setahun Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah, Program Pascasarjana UGM, Yogyakarta.

Ndraha, Taliziduhu. (2000). Otonomi Daerah, Desentralisasi dan Pembangunan, Makalah.

Hajhon, Philipus M. (1990). Fungsi Normatif Hukum Administrasi Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintah Yang Bersih, Pidato Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar Pada Fakultas Hukum UNAIR, Surabaya.

Hadjon, Philipus M. (2004). Penerapan Eksekusi Putusan PTUN Terhadap Pejabat TUN di Daerah, Disampaikan pada Workshop tentang Penerapan Eksekusi Putusan TUN dalam kaitannya dengan pelaksanaan otonomi daerah, Jakarta, 28 Agustus 2004.

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 6072 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) icon PDF Download : 60856 times

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Pembuktian Potensi Kerugian dalam Gugatan terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara
Rizky Ramadhan Baried
SASI  vol: 27  issue: 3  first page: 346  year: 2021  
Type: Journal [View Source]



Copyright (c) 2019 Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Pembuktian Potensi Kerugian dalam Gugatan terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara
Rizky Ramadhan Baried
SASI  vol: 27  issue: 3  first page: 346  year: 2021  
Type: Journal [View Source]