EFEKTIFITAS EKSEKUSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 51 TAHUN 2009
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i1.153Keywords:
Implementation of Decision, State Administrative CourtAbstract
The enforcement of justice and the limitation of the use of violence are two of the many conditions and values or the upholding of democracy. One of the institutions for the implementation of democratic values is the existence of a free judicial system to guarantee human rights and to maintain justice. The urgency of the existence of administrative justice in realizing the rule of law encourages the government to establish a legal system in the administrative court. Namely through the establishment of Act No. 5 of 1986 on the State Administrative Court, which is the foundation for the establishment of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia. In the explanation of Law Number 5 Year 1986 mentioned that the State Administrative Court was held in order to provide protection to the people of the court of justice, who felt themselves harmed by a Decision of State Administration. In principle, a country is expected to provide protection to the human rights of its citizens. What is done through the separation or distribution of state power, because the centralization of state power absolutely in one hand alone makes authoritarian government. While the government based on the law is expected to guarantee the protection of the human rights of its citizens.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Amrullah Salim, The System of Administration Juridichions In France, Alumni, Jakarta, 1987
Baharudin Lopa, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1988
Ichtijanto, Pembangunan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Moral, Alumni, Bandung, 1998
Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, cetakan IX, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 2004
________, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 1993
Irfan Fachruddin, Konsekuensi Pengadilan Administrasi Terhadap
Tindakan Pemerintah, Alumni, Bandung, 2003
Philipus M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada Universitas Prees, Yogyakarta, 1994
Paulus Efendi Lotulung, SH., Kapita Selekta Hukum, Galia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1995
Ridwan Tjandra.w., Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Revisi II, 2002
Rozali Abdullah, Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Rajawali, Jakarta, 1992
S.F. Marbun, Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administrasi, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2003
Sri Pudyatmoko, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Salah Satu Fungsi Kontrol Pemerintah, Universitas Atma Jaya, Yogyakarta, 1996
Sumaryati Hartono, Politik Hukum Menuju Satu Sistem Hukum Nasional, Alumni, Bandung, 1991
Sumaryono dan Anna Eliyana, Tuntutan Praktek Beracara di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Prima Media Gramedia, Jakarta, 1999
T. Boestomi, Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Alumni, Bandung, 1984
Zairin Hararap, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Cetak III (Revisi), Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1997
M. Solly Lubis, â€PTUN dalam Perspektif HAMâ€, Artikel Radar No. 30, edisi Maret-April. 1988.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Soeleman Baranyanan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
